veterinary diet
This is a medical nutrition decision. Speak to your vet.
This is a veterinary diet product: a "dietetic" feed designed for a particular nutritional purpose and intended for use under veterinary direction. The score and figures below are readings of the label, the same as for any other food: they can't tell you whether this product is right for your dog.
Hill's Pet Nutrition k/d Beef & Vegetable Stew Dog Food
Wet Chunks · completeveterinary diet
Our verdict
Is Hill's Pet Nutrition k/d Beef & Vegetable Stew Dog Food a good dog food?
We score it 43/100 (Poor). The main reasons are set out in "Why you might not" below, and every step of the calculation is shown under "How we calculated this score".
100% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
- Doesn't list turkey, lamb, venison, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids chicken: the label lists chicken
- Your dog avoids beef: the label lists beef
- Your dog avoids fish: the label lists fish oil
- Your dog avoids pork: the label lists pork liver
- Your dog avoids grain: the label lists rice - white
- You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Nutrition and feeding
Typical analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed | Dry matter | Directory average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | - | 15.90% | 37.69% (137 eligible foods) |
| Fat | - | 23.80% | 23.89% (134 eligible foods) |
| Fibre | - | 3.50% | 3.81% (135 eligible foods) |
| Ash | - | 0% | 8.99% (130 eligible foods) |
| Carbohydrates | - | 52.50% | 30.63% (76 eligible foods) |
| Calcium | - | 0.77% | - |
| Phosphorus | - | 0.30% | - |
| Sodium | - | 0.17% | - |
Energy: 101 kcal/100g
Additives & feeding info
Feeding and storage
Feeding guide
Daily Feeding Recommendations (12.5 oz / 354 g cans): 5 lb dog = 5/8 can; 10 lb = 1; 15 lb = 1 1/3; 20 lb = 1 2/3; 30 lb = 2 1/4; 40 lb = 2 3/4; 50 lb = 3 1/4; 60 lb = 3 3/4; 70 lb = 4 1/4; 80 lb = 4 2/3; 100 lb = 5 1/2; 120 lb = 6 1/4. Gradually transition over 7 days or more. Exclusively feed recommended Prescription Diet dry and wet foods. Keep fresh water available at all times.
No additives recorded yet.
Ingredients (28)100% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- meat 16.4%
- additive 16.3%
- carb 15.1%
- supplement 14.5%
- veg 12.1%
- oil 10.5%
- fibre 7.4%
- other 4.7%
- mineral 2.9%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Water | Water | other | - | 4.7 |
| 2 | Beef | Beef | meat · medium | - | 4.6 |
| 3 | Carrots | Carrots | veg · good | - | 4.5 |
| 4 | Pork Liver | Pork Liver | meat · good | - | 4.5 |
| 5 | Rice | Rice - white | carb · medium | - | 4.4 |
| 6 | Chicken Fat | Chicken Oil and Fat | oil · good | - | 4.3 |
| 7 | Rice Starch | Rice - white | carb · medium | - | 4.2 |
| 8 | Dextrose | Dextrose | carb · poor | - | 4.1 |
| 9 | Green Peas | Peas | veg · good | - | 4.0 |
| 10 | Sugar | Sugars | additive · poor | - | 3.9 |
| 11 | Hydrolyzed Chicken Flavor | Chicken | meat · medium | - | 3.9 |
| 12 | Powdered Cellulose | Powdered Cellulose | fibre · poor | - | 3.8 |
| 13 | Fish Oil | Fish Oil | oil · good | - | 3.7 |
| 14 | Dried Beet Pulp | Beet Pulp | fibre · medium | - | 3.6 |
| 15 | Flaxseed | Linseed | veg · good | - | 3.5 |
| 16 | Egg Whites | Egg | meat · good | - | 3.4 |
| 17 | Potassium Alginate | Alginate | additive · medium | - | 3.4 |
| 18 | Caramel color | Caramel Colour | additive · poor | - | 3.3 |
| 19 | Calcium Lactate | Calcium Carbonate | supplement · medium | - | 3.2 |
| 20 | Calcium Gluconate | Calcium Carbonate | supplement · medium | - | 3.1 |
| 21 | Natural Flavor | Flavor | additive · poor | - | 3.0 |
| 22 | Potassium Citrate | Potassium Citrate | mineral · good | - | 2.9 |
| 23 | Brewers Dried Yeast | Yeast | supplement · good | - | 2.9 |
| 24 | Choline Chloride | Choline | supplement · good | - | 2.8 |
| 25 | Guar Gum | Guar gum | additive · medium | - | 2.7 |
| 26 | Betaine | Betaine Anhydrous | supplement · good | - | 2.6 |
| 27 | Soybean Oil | Soybean oil | oil · medium | - | 2.5 |
| 28 | Whole Grain Oats | Oats | carb · medium | - | 2.4 |
- 1. Water4.7% estimated
- 2. Beef4.6% estimated
- 3. Carrots4.5% estimated
- 4. Pork Liver4.5% estimated
- 5. Rice4.4% estimated
- 6. Chicken Fat4.3% estimated
- 7. Rice Starch4.2% estimated
- 8. Dextrose4.1% estimated
- 9. Green Peas4.0% estimated
- 10. Sugar3.9% estimated
- 11. Hydrolyzed Chicken Flavor3.9% estimated
- 12. Powdered Cellulose3.8% estimated
- 13. Fish Oil3.7% estimated
- 14. Dried Beet Pulp3.6% estimated
- 15. Flaxseed3.5% estimated
- 16. Egg Whites3.4% estimated
- 17. Potassium Alginate3.4% estimated
- 18. Caramel color3.3% estimated
- 19. Calcium Lactate3.2% estimated
- 20. Calcium Gluconate3.1% estimated
- 21. Natural Flavor3.0% estimated
- 22. Potassium Citrate2.9% estimated
- 23. Brewers Dried Yeast2.9% estimated
- 24. Choline Chloride2.8% estimated
- 25. Guar Gum2.7% estimated
- 26. Betaine2.6% estimated
- 27. Soybean Oil2.5% estimated
- 28. Whole Grain Oats2.4% estimated
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-18
Brand and contact: Hill's Pet Nutrition
- Website
- https://www.hillspet.com/
- Contact page
- www.hillspet.com
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-18
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- www.hillspet.com
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Brand and retailer reviews
External platform ratings are not scores for this individual recipe.
Trustpilot: 3.0/5 · 3 reviews
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
The overall score is 43 out of 100. Ingredients without printed percentages cost -10.6 points, and the additive load took off another -4.4 points. On the positive side, the additives in the recipe added +3.3, while the overall quality of the ingredient list contributed +2.9. This is a general explanation of how the score works, not veterinary advice. For any health condition, food choice is a decision for your vet.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.3 | 9.191 | +2.87 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 18.3% | -0.115 | -2.11 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 14.3% | -0.092 | -1.32 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 6.1% | -0.005 | -0.03 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 20.2% | 0.163 | +3.29 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 18.4% | -0.012 | -0.22 |
| Recipe graded poor | 18.2% | -0.065 | -1.18 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 5 | -0.876 | -4.38 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 4.1% | 0.060 | +0.25 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| Additive penalty | -19.72 | 0.222 | -4.38 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 33.786 | +33.79 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | yes | -0.672 | -0.67 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.3 | 9.191 | +2.87 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.096 | +0.00 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 18.3% | -0.115 | -2.11 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 14.3% | -0.092 | -1.32 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 6.1% | -0.005 | -0.03 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 20.2% | 0.163 | +3.29 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 18.4% | -0.012 | -0.22 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.375 | +0.00 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.027 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 18.2% | -0.065 | -1.18 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 5 | -0.876 | -4.38 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 4.1% | 0.060 | +0.25 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | no | 2.294 | +0.00 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | no | 0.707 | +0.00 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | -19.72 | 0.222 | -4.38 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 33.786 | +33.79 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | yes | -0.672 | -0.67 |
- Processing-type offset
- -0.08
- Subtotal
- 43.0
- Final score
- 43/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
Analytical constituents not declared
No nutritional additives section declared on the label.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (voluntary) - not on file | 0/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) | 5/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared, Additives declared, Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
See all current recalls we track.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
Claims on file; none we can check against the label
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Made in the USA with global ingredients you can trust (on page) | provenance | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| ActivBiome+ Kidney Defense, a proprietary blend of prebiotics shown to nourish the gut microbiome to help support kidney function (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Formulated to promote a urinary environment that reduces the risk of developing struvite & calcium oxalate crystals (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Clinically proven nutrition to improve & lengthen quality of life (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Made with beef & vegetables (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| U.S. Veterinarians' #1 Recommended Brand (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Reduced phosphorus & sodium, enriched with omega-3 fatty acids (on page) | Nutrient | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| With optimized levels of essential amino acids and high quality protein to help keep them strong (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.