Hill's Pet Nutrition Adult Perfect Weight Small Bites Chicken & Brown Rice Recipe
Dry Extruded · complete
Our verdict
Is Hill's Pet Nutrition Adult Perfect Weight Small Bites Chicken & Brown Rice Recipe a good dog food?
We score it 45/100 (Average). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
Only part of the analytical constituents are declared, so the nutritional picture is incomplete.
100% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
- Doesn't list beef, turkey, lamb, fish, venison, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids chicken: the label lists chicken
- Your dog avoids pork: it is listed as an ingredient
- Your dog avoids grain: the label lists pearled barley
- You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Nutrition and feedingProtein 28.80% · Fat 11.20%
Typical analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed | Dry matter | Directory average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 28.80% | 28.80% | 37.69% (137 eligible foods) |
| Fat | 11.20% | 11.20% | 23.89% (134 eligible foods) |
| Fibre | 10.30% | 10.30% | 3.81% (135 eligible foods) |
| Carbohydrates | 42.90% | 42.90% | 30.63% (76 eligible foods) |
| Omega-3 fatty acids | 0.75% | - | - |
| Omega-6 fatty acids | 2.18% | - | - |
| Calcium | 0.93% | - | - |
| Phosphorus | 0.75% | - | - |
| Sodium | 0.40% | - | - |
Energy: 319 kcal/100g
Additives & feeding info
Feeding and storage
Feeding guide
Adjust feeding amounts as necessary to maintain optimal weight. New food: mix increasing amounts over 7-day period. Keep fresh water available. Daily amounts range from 3/8 cup (35g) for 5lb dogs up to 4 1/2 cups (445g) for 120lb dogs depending on weight loss vs weight management goals.
Additives declared on the label
Nutritional additives
Vitamin E 691 IU/kg; Vitamin C 192 ppm; L-Carnitine 432.6 ppm; Glucosamine 583 ppm; Chondroitin Sulfate 1390 ppm
Ingredients (20)100% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- meat 22.1%
- fibre 22.0%
- carb 18.5%
- supplement 15.7%
- veg 8.9%
- additive 8.0%
- oil 4.8%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Chicken | Chicken | meat · medium | - | 6.6 |
| 2 | Cracked Pearled Barley | Pearled Barley | carb · medium | - | 6.4 |
| 3 | Brown Rice | Rice - brown / whole grain | carb · medium | - | 6.2 |
| 4 | Pea Fiber | Pea Fibre | fibre · medium | - | 6.1 |
| 5 | Corn Protein Meal | Maize gluten | carb · poor | - | 5.9 |
| 6 | Chicken Meal | Dried chicken protein | meat · good | - | 5.7 |
| 7 | Dried Tomato Pomace | Tomato Pomace | fibre · medium | - | 5.6 |
| 8 | Oat Fiber | Crude Fibre | fibre · medium | - | 5.4 |
| 9 | Chicken Liver Flavor | Liver | meat · good | - | 5.2 |
| 10 | Flaxseed | Linseed | veg · good | - | 5.1 |
| 11 | Dried Beet Pulp | Beet Pulp | fibre · medium | - | 4.9 |
| 12 | Coconut Oil | Coconut Oil | oil · medium | - | 4.8 |
| 13 | Pork Liver Flavor | Liver | meat · good | - | 4.6 |
| 14 | Lactic Acid | Lactic Acid | additive · medium | - | 4.4 |
| 15 | Potassium Chloride | Potassium Chloride | supplement · medium | - | 4.3 |
| 16 | L-Lysine | Lysine | supplement · medium | - | 4.1 |
| 17 | DL-Methionine | Methionine | supplement · good | - | 3.9 |
| 18 | Carrots | Carrots | veg · good | - | 3.8 |
| 19 | Iodized Salt | Salt | additive · poor | - | 3.6 |
| 20 | Lipoic Acid | Lipoic Acid | supplement · good | - | 3.4 |
- 1. Chicken6.6% estimated
- 2. Cracked Pearled Barley6.4% estimated
- 3. Brown Rice6.2% estimated
- 4. Pea Fiber6.1% estimated
- 5. Corn Protein Meal5.9% estimated
- 6. Chicken Meal5.7% estimated
- 7. Dried Tomato Pomace5.6% estimated
- 8. Oat Fiber5.4% estimated
- 9. Chicken Liver Flavor5.2% estimated
- 10. Flaxseed5.1% estimated
- 11. Dried Beet Pulp4.9% estimated
- 12. Coconut Oil4.8% estimated
- 13. Pork Liver Flavor4.6% estimated
- 14. Lactic Acid4.4% estimated
- 15. Potassium Chloride4.3% estimated
- 16. L-Lysine4.1% estimated
- 17. DL-Methionine3.9% estimated
- 18. Carrots3.8% estimated
- 19. Iodized Salt3.6% estimated
- 20. Lipoic Acid3.4% estimated
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-18
Brand and contact: Hill's Pet Nutrition
- Website
- https://www.hillspet.com/
- Contact page
- www.hillspet.com
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-18
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- www.hillspet.com
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Brand and retailer reviews
External platform ratings are not scores for this individual recipe.
Trustpilot: 3.0/5 · 3 reviews
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
This recipe achieves a final score of 45 out of 100 based on several key factors. The overall quality of the ingredient list added +4.1 points. However, ingredients without printed percentages reduced the score by -10.6. Additionally, the processing format deducted -6.7 and the carbohydrate content contributed -2.4.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.4 | 9.191 | +4.06 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 21.2% | -0.115 | -2.43 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 6.1% | -0.092 | -0.56 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 6.6% | -0.005 | -0.03 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 9.3% | 0.163 | +1.52 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 18.7% | -0.012 | -0.23 |
| Recipe graded poor | 9.5% | -0.065 | -0.62 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 2 | -0.876 | -1.75 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 5.9% | 0.060 | +0.35 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| Additive penalty | -9.71 | 0.222 | -2.16 |
| Processing multiplier | 0.98 | 33.786 | +33.11 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.4 | 9.191 | +4.06 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.096 | +0.00 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 21.2% | -0.115 | -2.43 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 6.1% | -0.092 | -0.56 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 6.6% | -0.005 | -0.03 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 9.3% | 0.163 | +1.52 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 18.7% | -0.012 | -0.23 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.375 | +0.00 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.027 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 9.5% | -0.065 | -0.62 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 2 | -0.876 | -1.75 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 5.9% | 0.060 | +0.35 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | no | 0.707 | +0.00 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | -9.71 | 0.222 | -2.16 |
| Processing multiplier | 0.98 | 33.786 | +33.11 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- +0.02
- Additives declared on label
- +1 transparency bonus
- Subtotal
- 45.1
- Final score
- 45/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
Guaranteed-analysis FEDIAF score: crude minimums and maximums are bounds, not typical values; moisture (a maximum) uses the processing median where available; experimental US score.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 28.8 | 31.8 (band 18 to 40%) | 100 |
| Fat | 11.2 | 12.4 (band 5.5 to 20%) | 98.5 |
| Fibre | 10.3 | 11.4 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 100 |
| Calcium | 0.93 | 1 (band 0.5 to 2.5%) | 85.8 |
| Phosphorus | 0.75 | 0.8 (band 0.4 to 1.6%) | 91.4 |
| Sodium | 0.4 | 0.4 (band 0.1+%) | 100 |
| Calcium:phosphorus ratio | 1.2 | 1.2 (band 1 to 2%) | 84.4 |
| Omega fatty acids (omega-6 and omega-3) | - | - | 100 |
| Energy (kcal/100g) | 319 | 352.5 | 100 |
Fibre: Declared as a maximum; the high-fibre taper is not applied.
Omega fatty acids (omega-6 and omega-3): scored as the mean of its declared components (omega-6 100). The FEDIAF minimum for omega-6 is linoleic acid specifically.
Scored over 9 declared nutrients (combined weight 105); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score. Moisture was not declared and was estimated at 9.5% from the food type.
Declared fortification: 5 nutritional additives on the label
- Vitamin E 691 IU/kg
- Vitamin C 192 ppm
- L-Carnitine 432.6 ppm
- Glucosamine 583 ppm
- Chondroitin Sulfate 1390 ppm
Low confidence: partial analysis or moisture estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (voluntary) - not on file | 0/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) | 5/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared, Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
See all current recalls we track.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
Claims on file; none we can check against the label
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Over 70% of dogs lost weight within 10 weeks when fed this nutrition (USA Study) (on pack) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| breakthrough weight management nutrition with clinically proven technology (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Safe and effective weight loss with visible results within 10 weeks (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| High protein, high fiber formula enriched with L-carnitine & coconut oil helps support pets' metabolisms for a healthy body weight (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| U.S. Veterinarians' #1 Recommended Brand (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| provides complete and balanced nutrition for maintenance of adult dogs (on pack) | Nutrient | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Delicious food in a small bite size (on pack) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Alternatives to Adult Perfect Weight Small Bites Chicken & Brown Rice Recipe
Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.