Hill's Pet Nutrition Adult Perfect Digestion Chicken, Vegetable & Rice Stew
Wet Chunks · complete
Our verdict
Is Hill's Pet Nutrition Adult Perfect Digestion Chicken, Vegetable & Rice Stew a good dog food?
We score it 54/100 (Average). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
Only part of the analytical constituents are declared, so the nutritional picture is incomplete.
100% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
- Doesn't list beef, turkey, lamb, venison, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids chicken: the label lists chicken broth
- Your dog avoids fish: the label lists fish oil
- Your dog avoids pork: the label lists pork liver
- Your dog avoids grain: the label lists rice - white
- You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Nutrition and feedingProtein 25.70% · Fat 16.70%
Typical analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed | Dry matter | Directory average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 25.70% | 25.70% | 37.69% (137 eligible foods) |
| Fat | 16.70% | 16.70% | 23.89% (134 eligible foods) |
| Fibre | 2.40% | 2.40% | 3.81% (135 eligible foods) |
| Carbohydrates | 49.10% | 49.10% | 30.63% (76 eligible foods) |
| Calcium | 0.94% | - | - |
| Phosphorus | 0.65% | - | - |
| Sodium | 0.39% | - | - |
Energy: 76.7 kcal/100g
Additives & feeding info
Feeding and storage
Storage
Cover and refrigerate unused portion.
Feeding guide
Adult maintenance: 5 lb (2.3 kg) – 3/4 can; 10 lb (4.5 kg) – 1 1/4 cans; 20 lb (9.1 kg) – 2 cans; 30 lb (14 kg) – 2 3/4 cans; 40 lb (18 kg) – 3 1/2 cans; 50 lb (23 kg) – 4 1/4 cans; 60 lb (27 kg) – 4 3/4 cans; 80 lb (36 kg) – 6 cans; 100 lb (45 kg) – 7 cans; 120 lb (54 kg) – 8 cans (12.8 oz / 363 g cans). Adjust to maintain optimal weight; mix increasing amounts of new food with decreasing amounts of old food over a 7-day period.
Additives declared on the label
Nutritional additives
Vitamin E Supplement; Thiamine Mononitrate; L-Ascorbyl-2-Polyphosphate (source of Vitamin C); Niacin Supplement; Calcium Pantothenate; Vitamin B12 Supplement; Pyridoxine Hydrochloride; Biotin; Riboflavin Supplement; Vitamin D3 Supplement; Folic Acid; Zinc Oxide; Ferrous Sulfate; Manganese Sulfate; Copper Sulfate; Calcium Iodate
Technological additives
Potassium Alginate; Guar Gum
Ingredients (26)100% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- meat 23.6%
- veg 18.8%
- supplement 15.9%
- fibre 14.6%
- additive 10.5%
- carb 9.3%
- oil 7.4%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Chicken Broth | Chicken Broth | meat · medium | - | 5.1 |
| 2 | Chicken | Chicken | meat · medium | - | 5.0 |
| 3 | Pork Liver | Pork Liver | meat · good | - | 4.9 |
| 4 | Carrots | Carrots | veg · good | - | 4.8 |
| 5 | Rice | Rice - white | carb · medium | - | 4.7 |
| 6 | Rice Starch | Rice - white | carb · medium | - | 4.6 |
| 7 | Green Peas | Peas | veg · good | - | 4.5 |
| 8 | Chicken Liver Flavor | Liver | meat · good | - | 4.4 |
| 9 | Hydrolyzed Chicken Flavor | Chicken | meat · medium | - | 4.3 |
| 10 | Potassium Alginate | Alginate | additive · medium | - | 4.2 |
| 11 | Ground Pecan Shells | Ground Pecan Shell | fibre · poor | - | 4.1 |
| 12 | Chicken Fat | Chicken Oil and Fat | oil · good | - | 4.0 |
| 13 | Calcium Chloride | Calcium Carbonate | supplement · medium | - | 3.9 |
| 14 | Flaxseed | Linseed | veg · good | - | 3.8 |
| 15 | Dried Beet Pulp | Beet Pulp | fibre · medium | - | 3.7 |
| 16 | Dried Citrus Pulp | Citrus Pulp | fibre · medium | - | 3.6 |
| 17 | Guar Gum | Guar gum | additive · medium | - | 3.5 |
| 18 | Fish Oil | Fish Oil | oil · good | - | 3.4 |
| 19 | Dicalcium Phosphate | Dicalcium phosphate | supplement · medium | - | 3.3 |
| 20 | Oat Fiber | Crude Fibre | fibre · medium | - | 3.2 |
| 21 | Pumpkin | Pumpkin | veg · good | - | 3.1 |
| 22 | Calcium Lactate | Calcium Carbonate | supplement · medium | - | 3.0 |
| 23 | Calcium Gluconate | Calcium Carbonate | supplement · medium | - | 2.9 |
| 24 | Sodium Tripolyphosphate | Sodium Tripolyphosphate | additive · poor | - | 2.8 |
| 25 | Choline Chloride | Choline | supplement · good | - | 2.7 |
| 26 | Pressed Cranberries | Cranberries | veg · good | - | 2.6 |
- 1. Chicken Broth5.1% estimated
- 2. Chicken5.0% estimated
- 3. Pork Liver4.9% estimated
- 4. Carrots4.8% estimated
- 5. Rice4.7% estimated
- 6. Rice Starch4.6% estimated
- 7. Green Peas4.5% estimated
- 8. Chicken Liver Flavor4.4% estimated
- 9. Hydrolyzed Chicken Flavor4.3% estimated
- 10. Potassium Alginate4.2% estimated
- 11. Ground Pecan Shells4.1% estimated
- 12. Chicken Fat4.0% estimated
- 13. Calcium Chloride3.9% estimated
- 14. Flaxseed3.8% estimated
- 15. Dried Beet Pulp3.7% estimated
- 16. Dried Citrus Pulp3.6% estimated
- 17. Guar Gum3.5% estimated
- 18. Fish Oil3.4% estimated
- 19. Dicalcium Phosphate3.3% estimated
- 20. Oat Fiber3.2% estimated
- 21. Pumpkin3.1% estimated
- 22. Calcium Lactate3.0% estimated
- 23. Calcium Gluconate2.9% estimated
- 24. Sodium Tripolyphosphate2.8% estimated
- 25. Choline Chloride2.7% estimated
- 26. Pressed Cranberries2.6% estimated
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-18
Brand and contact: Hill's Pet Nutrition
- Website
- https://www.hillspet.com/
- Contact page
- www.hillspet.com
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-18
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- www.hillspet.com
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Brand and retailer reviews
External platform ratings are not scores for this individual recipe.
Trustpilot: 3.0/5 · 3 reviews
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
This recipe achieves a total score of 54 out of 100 based on several key factors. The presence of ingredients without printed percentages contributed -10.6 to the overall rating, while the overall quality of the ingredient list added +4.5. Furthermore, the additive load contributed -2.8, and the additives in the recipe adjusted the score by +2.3.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.5 | 9.191 | +4.52 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 12.2% | -0.115 | -1.40 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 11.0% | -0.092 | -1.01 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 8.5% | -0.005 | -0.04 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 14.2% | 0.163 | +2.31 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 21.9% | -0.012 | -0.27 |
| Recipe graded poor | 6.9% | -0.065 | -0.45 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 2 | -0.876 | -1.75 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 4.1% | 0.060 | +0.25 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| Additive penalty | -12.62 | 0.222 | -2.80 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 33.786 | +33.79 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | yes | -0.672 | -0.67 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.5 | 9.191 | +4.52 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.096 | +0.00 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 12.2% | -0.115 | -1.40 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 11.0% | -0.092 | -1.01 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 8.5% | -0.005 | -0.04 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 14.2% | 0.163 | +2.31 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 21.9% | -0.012 | -0.27 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.375 | +0.00 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.027 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 6.9% | -0.065 | -0.45 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 2 | -0.876 | -1.75 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 4.1% | 0.060 | +0.25 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | no | 0.707 | +0.00 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | -12.62 | 0.222 | -2.80 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 33.786 | +33.79 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | yes | -0.672 | -0.67 |
- Processing-type offset
- -0.08
- Additives declared on label
- +2 transparency bonus
- Subtotal
- 53.9
- Final score
- 54/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
Guaranteed-analysis FEDIAF score: crude minimums and maximums are bounds, not typical values; moisture (a maximum) uses the processing median where available; experimental US score.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 25.7 | 122.4 (band 18 to 40%) | 100 |
| Fat | 16.7 | 79.5 (band 5.5 to 20%) | 100 |
| Fibre | 2.4 | 11.4 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 100 |
| Calcium | 0.94 | 4.5 (band 0.5 to 2.5%) | 21 |
| Phosphorus | 0.65 | 3.1 (band 0.4 to 1.6%) | 6.5 |
| Sodium | 0.39 | 1.9 (band 0.1+%) | 100 |
| Calcium:phosphorus ratio | 1.4 | 1.4 (band 1 to 2%) | 96.8 |
| Energy (kcal/100g) | 76.7 | 365.2 | 100 |
Fibre: Declared as a maximum; the high-fibre taper is not applied.
Scored over 8 declared nutrients (combined weight 95); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score. Moisture was not declared and was estimated at 79% from the food type.
Declared fortification: 16 nutritional additives on the label
- Vitamin E Supplement
- Thiamine Mononitrate
- L-Ascorbyl-2-Polyphosphate (source of Vitamin C)
- Niacin Supplement
- Calcium Pantothenate
- Vitamin B12 Supplement
- Pyridoxine Hydrochloride
- Biotin
- Riboflavin Supplement
- Vitamin D3 Supplement
- Folic Acid
- Zinc Oxide
- Ferrous Sulfate
- Manganese Sulfate
- Copper Sulfate
- Calcium Iodate
Low confidence: partial analysis or moisture estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (voluntary) - not on file | 0/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) | 5/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared, Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
See all current recalls we track.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
Claims on file; none we can check against the label
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Made in the USA with global ingredients you can trust (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| U.S. Veterinarians' #1 Recommended Brand (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Contains ActivBiome+ Digestion, prebiotic blend activates the gut to support optimal digestion (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Promotes regularity and healthy stools with our special blend of prebiotics (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Helps your pet's body absorb & use vital nutrients (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Clinically proven antioxidants, Vitamin C+E, for a healthy immune system (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Great taste and texture for picky eaters (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Complete and balanced nutrition and minerals for vital organ health (on page) | Nutrient | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| High-quality protein to help maintain muscle mass (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Alternatives to Adult Perfect Digestion Chicken, Vegetable & Rice Stew
Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.