Hill's Pet Nutrition Adult No Corn, Wheat, Soy Chicken & Brown Rice Recipe Dog Food
Dry Extruded · complete
Our verdict
Is Hill's Pet Nutrition Adult No Corn, Wheat, Soy Chicken & Brown Rice Recipe Dog Food a good dog food?
We score it 45/100 (Average). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
100% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
- Single named protein: chicken
- Doesn't list beef, turkey, lamb, fish, venison, pork, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids grain: the label lists rice - brown / whole grain
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Nutrition and feeding
Typical analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed | Dry matter | Directory average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | - | 23.80% | 37.69% (137 eligible foods) |
| Fat | - | 16.30% | 23.89% (134 eligible foods) |
| Fibre | - | 1.60% | 3.81% (135 eligible foods) |
| Carbohydrates | - | 52% | 30.63% (76 eligible foods) |
Energy: 372 kcal/100g
Additives & feeding info
Feeding and storage
Feeding guide
Weight of Dog - lbs (kgs) Amount per Day - cups (grams) 5 (2,3) 1/2 (55) 10 (4,5) 7/8 (90) 20 (9,1) 1 1/2 (160) 30 (14) 2 (210) 40 (18) 2 1/2 (265) 50 (23) 3 (315) 60 (27) 3 1/2 (370) 80 (36) 4 1/4 (445) 100 (45) 5 (525) 120 (54) 5 3/4 (605)
Additives declared on the label
Nutritional additives
Vitamin E 733 IU/kg; Vitamin C 197 ppm
Technological additives
Mixed Tocopherols (natural preservative)
Ingredients (15)100% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- carb 38.3%
- meat 22.0%
- additive 10.4%
- supplement 9.9%
- oil 7.0%
- veg 6.4%
- fibre 6.1%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Chicken | Chicken | meat · medium | - | 8.7 |
| 2 | Brown Rice | Rice - brown / whole grain | carb · medium | - | 8.4 |
| 3 | Brewers Rice | Rice - white | carb · medium | - | 8.1 |
| 4 | Cracked Pearled Barley | Pearled Barley | carb · medium | - | 7.8 |
| 5 | Chicken Meal | Dried chicken protein | meat · good | - | 7.5 |
| 6 | Whole Grain Oats | Oats | carb · medium | - | 7.2 |
| 7 | Chicken Fat | Chicken Oil and Fat | oil · good | - | 7.0 |
| 8 | Pea Protein | Pea protein | carb · medium | - | 6.7 |
| 9 | Flaxseed | Linseed | veg · good | - | 6.4 |
| 10 | Dried Beet Pulp | Beet Pulp | fibre · medium | - | 6.1 |
| 11 | Chicken Liver Flavor | Liver | meat · good | - | 5.8 |
| 12 | Lactic Acid | Lactic Acid | additive · medium | - | 5.5 |
| 13 | Potassium Chloride | Potassium Chloride | supplement · medium | - | 5.2 |
| 14 | Iodized Salt | Salt | additive · poor | - | 4.9 |
| 15 | Choline Chloride | Choline | supplement · good | - | 4.6 |
- 1. Chicken8.7% estimated
- 2. Brown Rice8.4% estimated
- 3. Brewers Rice8.1% estimated
- 4. Cracked Pearled Barley7.8% estimated
- 5. Chicken Meal7.5% estimated
- 6. Whole Grain Oats7.2% estimated
- 7. Chicken Fat7.0% estimated
- 8. Pea Protein6.7% estimated
- 9. Flaxseed6.4% estimated
- 10. Dried Beet Pulp6.1% estimated
- 11. Chicken Liver Flavor5.8% estimated
- 12. Lactic Acid5.5% estimated
- 13. Potassium Chloride5.2% estimated
- 14. Iodized Salt4.9% estimated
- 15. Choline Chloride4.6% estimated
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-18
Brand and contact: Hill's Pet Nutrition
- Website
- https://www.hillspet.com/
- Contact page
- www.hillspet.com
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-18
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- www.hillspet.com
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Brand and retailer reviews
External platform ratings are not scores for this individual recipe.
Trustpilot: 3.0/5 · 3 reviews
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
This recipe achieves a final score of 45 out of 100 based on several key factors. The overall quality of the ingredient list added +4.9 points. However, ingredients without printed percentages reduced the score by -10.6. Additionally, the processing format deducted -6.7 and the carbohydrate content contributed -4.8.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.5 | 9.191 | +4.89 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 41.5% | -0.115 | -4.77 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 8.5% | -0.092 | -0.78 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 7.1% | -0.005 | -0.04 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 11.6% | 0.163 | +1.88 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 11.2% | -0.012 | -0.14 |
| Recipe graded poor | 4.9% | -0.065 | -0.32 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 1 | -0.876 | -0.88 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 4.9% | 0.060 | +0.30 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| Additive penalty | -12.62 | 0.222 | -2.80 |
| Processing multiplier | 0.98 | 33.786 | +33.11 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.5 | 9.191 | +4.89 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.096 | +0.00 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 41.5% | -0.115 | -4.77 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 8.5% | -0.092 | -0.78 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 7.1% | -0.005 | -0.04 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 11.6% | 0.163 | +1.88 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 11.2% | -0.012 | -0.14 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.375 | +0.00 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.027 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 4.9% | -0.065 | -0.32 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 1 | -0.876 | -0.88 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 4.9% | 0.060 | +0.30 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | no | 0.707 | +0.00 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | -12.62 | 0.222 | -2.80 |
| Processing multiplier | 0.98 | 33.786 | +33.11 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- +0.02
- Additives declared on label
- +2 transparency bonus
- Subtotal
- 45.3
- Final score
- 45/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
Analytical constituents not declared
Declared fortification: 2 nutritional additives on the label
- Vitamin E 733 IU/kg
- Vitamin C 197 ppm
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (voluntary) - not on file | 0/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) | 5/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared, Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
See all current recalls we track.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
Claims on file; none we can check against the label
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| No Corn, Wheat, Soy (on page) | provenance | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Supports lean muscle and beautiful coat (on pack) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Healthy skin & coat with Omega-6 & Vitamin E (on pack) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Lean muscles supported with high-quality protein (on pack) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Healthy digestion supported by natural fibers (on pack) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| U.S. Veterinarians' #1 Recommended Brand (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Made in the USA with global ingredients you can trust (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Great tasting natural* nutrition (on pack) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Alternatives to Adult No Corn, Wheat, Soy Chicken & Brown Rice Recipe Dog Food
Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.