HEY HOLY Ravishing Retrievers Trockenfutter mit Lamm
Dry Extruded · complete
Our verdict
Is HEY HOLY Ravishing Retrievers Trockenfutter mit Lamm a good dog food?
We score it 58/100 (Average). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
Only part of the analytical constituents are declared, so the nutritional picture is incomplete.
60% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
- Grain-free: no grain ingredients listed
- Doesn't list chicken, beef, turkey, venison, pork, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids lamb: the label lists lamb
- Your dog avoids fish: the label lists green-lipped mussel
- You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Nutrition and feedingProtein 24% · Fat 14%
Typical analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed |
|---|---|
| Protein | 24% |
| Fat | 14% |
| Fibre | 3% |
| Ash | 6.90% |
| Omega-3 fatty acids | 0.50% |
| Omega-6 fatty acids | 2.50% |
| Calcium | 0.90% |
| Phosphorus | 0.70% |
Additives & feeding info
Feeding and storage
Feeding guide
Fütterungsempfehlung basierend auf einem Energiegehalt von 15,70 MJ ME/kg: 12-16 kg Idealgewicht → 170-215 g/Tag; 20-25 kg → 250-300 g/Tag; 30-35 kg → 340-385 g/Tag; 40-50 kg → 425-500 g/Tag
Additives declared on the label
Nutritional additives
Vitamin A 16 000 IE/kg; Vitamin D3 1 050 IE/kg; Vitamin E 140 mg/kg; Zink (als Zinksulfat, Monohydrat) 75 mg/kg; Kupfer (als Kupfer(II)-sulfat-Pentahydrat) 16,5 mg/kg; Eisen (als Eisen(II)-Karbonat) 33 mg/kg; Mangan (als Mangan(II)-oxid) 66 mg/kg; Jod (als Kaliumiodid) 2,5 mg/kg; Selen (als Natriumselenit) 0,17 mg/kg; L-Carnitin 200 mg/kg
Technological additives
Natürliche Konservierungsmittel und Antioxidationsmittel
Ingredients (15)60% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- meat 40.0%
- veg 26.1%
- supplement 10.8%
- oil 9.0%
- carb 5.6%
- other 4.8%
- unknown 3.8%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lamb (40%) | Lamb | meat · medium | 40 | 40.0 |
| 2 | Sweet Potatoes | Sweet Potatoes | carb · good | - | 5.6 |
| 3 | Peas | Peas | veg · good | - | 5.4 |
| 4 | Chickpeas | Chickpeas | veg · good | - | 5.2 |
| 5 | Linseed | Linseed | veg · good | - | 5.0 |
| 6 | Protein Hydrolysate | Protein Hydrolysate | other · poor | - | 4.8 |
| 7 | Salmon Oil | Salmon Oil | oil · good | - | 4.6 |
| 8 | Rapeseed Oil | Rapeseed oil | oil · good | - | 4.4 |
| 9 | Mineral Salts | Salt | additive · poor | - | 4.2 |
| 10 | Apple | Apples | veg · good | - | 4.0 |
| 11 | Pomegranate Peel | Pomegranate | veg · good | - | 3.8 |
| 12 | Carrots | Carrots | veg · good | - | 3.6 |
| 13 | Yeast | Yeast | supplement · good | - | 3.4 |
| 14 | Green-Lipped Mussel | Green-Lipped Mussel | supplement · good | - | 3.2 |
| 15 | Peppermint | Peppermint | veg · good | - | 3.0 |
- 1. Lamb (40%)40% declared40.0% estimated
- 2. Sweet Potatoes5.6% estimated
- 3. Peas5.4% estimated
- 4. Chickpeas5.2% estimated
- 5. Linseed5.0% estimated
- 6. Protein Hydrolysate4.8% estimated
- 7. Salmon Oil4.6% estimated
- 8. Rapeseed Oil4.4% estimated
- 9. Mineral Salts4.2% estimated
- 10. Apple4.0% estimated
- 11. Pomegranate Peel3.8% estimated
- 12. Carrots3.6% estimated
- 13. Yeast3.4% estimated
- 14. Green-Lipped Mussel3.2% estimated
- 15. Peppermint3.0% estimated
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-27
Brand and contact: HEY HOLY
- Website
- https://heyholy.com/
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-27
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- heyholy.com
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Brand and retailer reviews
External platform ratings are not scores for this individual recipe.
Trustpilot: 4.7/5 · 1,401 reviews
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
This recipe achieves a total score of 58 out of 100 based on several key factors. The meat content contributed +2.5 points, while the overall quality of the ingredient list added +6.2 points. Conversely, the processing format subtracted -6.7 points, and ingredients without printed percentages reduced the score by -6.3 points.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.7 | 9.191 | +6.18 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 25.9% | 0.096 | +2.48 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 3.2% | -0.115 | -0.37 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 20.5% | -0.092 | -1.89 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 17.7% | -0.005 | -0.09 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 22.9% | -0.012 | -0.28 |
| Other share of dry matter | 5.5% | -0.375 | -2.07 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 4.4% | -0.027 | -0.12 |
| Recipe graded poor | 4.8% | -0.065 | -0.31 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 1 | -0.876 | -0.88 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 4.8% | 0.060 | +0.29 |
| Undeclared quantities | 60.0% | -0.106 | -6.33 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Processing multiplier | 0.98 | 33.786 | +33.11 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.7 | 9.191 | +6.18 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 25.9% | 0.096 | +2.48 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 3.2% | -0.115 | -0.37 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 20.5% | -0.092 | -1.89 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 17.7% | -0.005 | -0.09 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.163 | +0.00 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 22.9% | -0.012 | -0.28 |
| Other share of dry matter | 5.5% | -0.375 | -2.07 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 4.4% | -0.027 | -0.12 |
| Recipe graded poor | 4.8% | -0.065 | -0.31 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 1 | -0.876 | -0.88 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 4.8% | 0.060 | +0.29 |
| Undeclared quantities | 60.0% | -0.106 | -6.33 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | no | 0.707 | +0.00 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | no | -3.158 | +0.00 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | 0.00 | 0.222 | +0.00 |
| Processing multiplier | 0.98 | 33.786 | +33.11 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- +0.02
- Additives declared on label
- +2 transparency bonus
- Subtotal
- 58.2
- Final score
- 58/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 24 | 26.5 (band 18 to 40%) | 93.2 |
| Fat | 14 | 15.5 (band 5.5 to 20%) | 100 |
| Fibre | 3 | 3.3 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 100 |
| Calcium | 0.9 | 1 (band 0.5 to 2.5%) | 84.8 |
| Phosphorus | 0.7 | 0.8 (band 0.4 to 1.6%) | 88.7 |
| Calcium:phosphorus ratio | 1.3 | 1.3 (band 1 to 2%) | 87.1 |
| Omega fatty acids (omega-6 and omega-3) | - | - | 100 |
Omega fatty acids (omega-6 and omega-3): scored as the mean of its declared components (omega-6 100). The FEDIAF minimum for omega-6 is linoleic acid specifically.
Scored over 7 declared nutrients (combined weight 90); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score. Moisture was not declared and was estimated at 9.5% from the food type.
Declared fortification: 10 nutritional additives on the label
- Vitamin A 16 000 IE/kg
- Vitamin D3 1 050 IE/kg
- Vitamin E 140 mg/kg
- Zink (als Zinksulfat, Monohydrat) 75 mg/kg
- Kupfer (als Kupfer(II)-sulfat-Pentahydrat) 16,5 mg/kg
- Eisen (als Eisen(II)-Karbonat) 33 mg/kg
- Mangan (als Mangan(II)-oxid) 66 mg/kg
- Jod (als Kaliumiodid) 2,5 mg/kg
- Selen (als Natriumselenit) 0,17 mg/kg
- L-Carnitin 200 mg/kg
Low confidence: partial analysis or moisture estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (40% of the recipe mass) (voluntary) | 8/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) - not on file | 0/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared, Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
See all current recalls we track.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
50/100 · limited — 4 checkable claims: 2 consistent, 2 contradicted.
Contradicted by the label
- "Nur ein Protein" — the declared label says otherwise on single protein.
- "Frisches Lammfleisch als einzige Proteinquelle" — the declared label says otherwise on single protein.
Consistent with the label
- "100% Getreidefrei" — supported by the declared grain-free data.
- "Adult-Futter für alle ausgewachsenen Hunde" — supported by the declared complete and balanced data.
6 further claims on file that we cannot check against the label.
Limited: at least one claim contradicts the declared label, or a recent upheld ASA ruling applies.
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nur ein Protein (on page) | Content | contradicted | Manufacturer assertion |
| Hochverträglich (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| 100% Getreidefrei (on page) | Free-from | consistent | Manufacturer assertion |
| Rassenspezifisch (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Adult-Futter für alle ausgewachsenen Hunde (on page) | Content | consistent | Manufacturer assertion |
| Frisches Lammfleisch als einzige Proteinquelle (on page) | Content | contradicted | Manufacturer assertion |
| Grünlippmuschel liefert wertvolle Knorpelbausteine, um Gelenk- und Knochenerkrankungen vorzubeugen (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| L-Carnitin unterstützt eine starke Muskulatur und den Energiestoffwechsel (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Zink unterstützt eine starke Hautbarriere, Lachsöl mit Omega-3-Fettsäuren pflegt Haut und Fell (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Präbiotika und B-Vitamine fördern das Wachstum gesunder Darmbakterien (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Alternatives to Ravishing Retrievers Trockenfutter mit Lamm
Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.