HEY HOLY Ravishing Retrievers Nassfutter mit Lamm

Wet Pate · complete

60out of 100

Average

our rating

Our verdict

Is HEY HOLY Ravishing Retrievers Nassfutter mit Lamm a good dog food?

We score it 60/100 (Average). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.

How we score

40% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.

Why you might choose it

Doesn't list grain ingredients.
High in protein: 43% protein on a dry-matter basis.
Declares energy content, which most labels omit.

Why you might not

Around 65% of the recipe is generic or unspecified ingredients.
High in fat: 26% fat on a dry-matter basis.
Meat makes up an estimated 10% of the dry matter (16% as fed); carbohydrates dominate.

Who is this food for?

Suits

Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
Grain-free: no grain ingredients listed
Doesn't list chicken, beef, turkey, venison, pork, duck as ingredients

Consider something else if:

Your dog avoids lamb: the label lists lamb
Your dog avoids fish: the label lists green-lipped mussel
You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein
You are limiting fat: 25.7% on a dry-matter basis is in the high band

These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.

Nutrition and feedingProtein 9.90% · Fat 5.90%

Typical analysis (as fed)

Nutrient	As fed
Protein	9.90%
Fat	5.90%
Fibre	0.60%
Ash	2.50%
Moisture	77%
Omega-3 fatty acids	0.10%
Omega-6 fatty acids	0.60%
Calcium	0.40%
Phosphorus	0.30%

Energy: 105 kcal/100g

Additives & feeding info

Feeding and storage

Feeding guide

Energy content 4.4 MJ ME/kg; 15-20kg dog: 803-996 g/day; 25-30kg: 1178-1350 g/day; 35-40kg: 1516-1675 g/day; 45-50kg: 1830-1981 g/day

Additives declared on the label

Nutritional additives

Vitamin D3 200 IE/kg; Zink (als Zinksulfat, Monohydrat) 25 mg/kg; Mangan (als Mangan(II)-sulfat, Monohydrat) 1.4 mg/kg; L-Carnitin 200 mg/kg

Ingredients (16)40% of the recipe is estimated

Estimated composition

unknown 61.9%
meat 16.2%
supplement 6.7%
veg 5.2%
oil 4.3%
other 2.9%
carb 2.8%

#	As declared	Matched	Label reading	Declared %	Est. %
1	Lamb	Lamb	meat · medium	-	8.2
2	lamb livers	Liver	meat · good	-	7.9
3	lamb lungs	Lung	meat · medium	-	7.7
4	lamb meat	Lamb	meat · medium	-	7.4
5	lamb hearts	Lamb Hearts	meat · good	-	7.1
6	lamb tripe	Lamb Tripe	meat · medium	-	6.9
7	Broth	Cooking broth	other · medium	-	6.6
8	Sweet Potatoes	Sweet Potatoes	carb · good	-	6.4
9	Peas	Peas	veg · good	-	6.1
10	Chickpeas	Chickpeas	veg · good	-	5.9
11	Minerals	Vitamins and minerals	supplement · medium	-	5.6
12	Sunflower Oil	Sunflower oil	oil · good	-	5.4
13	Brewer's Yeast	Brewer's Yeast	supplement · good	-	5.1
14	MOS	Mannanoligosaccharides	supplement · good	-	4.8
15	Salmon Oil	Salmon Oil	oil · good	-	4.6
16	Green Lipped Mussels	Green-Lipped Mussel	supplement · good	-	4.3

1. Lamb8.2% estimated
Lamb · meat · medium
2. lamb livers7.9% estimated
Liver · meat · good
3. lamb lungs7.7% estimated
Lung · meat · medium
4. lamb meat7.4% estimated
Lamb · meat · medium
5. lamb hearts7.1% estimated
Lamb Hearts · meat · good
6. lamb tripe6.9% estimated
Lamb Tripe · meat · medium
7. Broth6.6% estimated
Cooking broth · other · medium
8. Sweet Potatoes6.4% estimated
Sweet Potatoes · carb · good
9. Peas6.1% estimated
Peas · veg · good
10. Chickpeas5.9% estimated
Chickpeas · veg · good
11. Minerals5.6% estimated
Vitamins and minerals · supplement · medium
12. Sunflower Oil5.4% estimated
Sunflower oil · oil · good
13. Brewer's Yeast5.1% estimated
Brewer's Yeast · supplement · good
14. MOS4.8% estimated
Mannanoligosaccharides · supplement · good
15. Salmon Oil4.6% estimated
Salmon Oil · oil · good
16. Green Lipped Mussels4.3% estimated
Green-Lipped Mussel · supplement · good

Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-27

Brand and contact: HEY HOLY

Website: https://heyholy.com/

Trust and provenance

Recall history: No recalls recorded in our database
Label data last checked: 2026-09-27
Scored with: Model v3 (methodology)
Product page: heyholy.com

Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.

Brand and retailer reviews

External platform ratings are not scores for this individual recipe.

Trustpilot: 4.7/5 · 1,401 reviews

Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.

Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence

Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated

Why this score?

The product received a score of 60 out of 100. Ingredients without printed percentages reduced the score by -4.2, while the overall quality of the ingredient list added +2.6 points. Being labelled nutritionally complete contributed +2.3, and ingredients we could not classify deducted -1.7.

Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.

Component	Input	Coefficient	Contribution
Base score	-	30.909	+30.91
Average ingredient quality	0.3	9.191	+2.65
Carb share of dry matter	1.5%	-0.115	-0.17
Oil share of dry matter	8.9%	-0.092	-0.82
Vegetable share of dry matter	1.6%	-0.005	-0.01
Supplement share of dry matter	13.0%	-0.012	-0.16
Other share of dry matter	0.3%	-0.375	-0.11
Unrecognised share of dry matter	65.1%	-0.027	-1.73
Undeclared quantities	40.0%	-0.106	-4.22
Complete diet	yes	2.294	+2.29
Low meat (under 10% of dry matter)	yes	-3.158	-3.16
Processing multiplier	1.00	33.786	+33.79
Processing: Wet Pate	yes	-0.672	-0.67

Show all 40 components

Component	Input	Coefficient	Contribution
Base score	-	30.909	+30.91
Average ingredient quality	0.3	9.191	+2.65
Meat share of dry matter	0.0%	0.096	+0.00
Carb share of dry matter	1.5%	-0.115	-0.17
Oil share of dry matter	8.9%	-0.092	-0.82
Vegetable share of dry matter	1.6%	-0.005	-0.01
Additive share of dry matter	0.0%	0.163	+0.00
Supplement share of dry matter	13.0%	-0.012	-0.16
Other share of dry matter	0.3%	-0.375	-0.11
Unrecognised share of dry matter	65.1%	-0.027	-1.73
Recipe graded poor	0.0%	-0.065	+0.00
Poor-quality meat in recipe	0.0%	-0.179	+0.00
Number of poor ingredients	0	-0.876	+0.00
Largest single poor ingredient	0.0%	0.060	+0.00
Undeclared quantities	40.0%	-0.106	-4.22
Prints ingredient percentages	no	0.000	+0.00
Complete diet	yes	2.294	+2.29
Frozen or chilled fresh	no	0.000	+0.00
High meat (30%+ of dry matter)	no	0.707	+0.00
Low meat (under 10% of dry matter)	yes	-3.158	-3.16
High carb and low meat	no	-1.180	+0.00
Meat share × printed percentages	0.0	0.000	+0.00
Meat share × fresh	0.0	0.000	+0.00
Fresh × high meat	0.0	11.084	+0.00
Additive penalty	0.00	0.222	+0.00
Processing multiplier	1.00	33.786	+33.79
Processing: Raw	no	-0.054	+0.00
Processing: Fresh Chilled	no	-2.354	+0.00
Processing: Fresh Frozen	no	-2.354	+0.00
Processing: Fresh Refrigerated	no	0.000	+0.00
Processing: Fresh Shelf	no	-0.672	+0.00
Processing: Dry Freeze Dried	no	6.629	+0.00
Processing: Dry Air Dried	no	6.331	+0.00
Processing: Dry Cold Pressed	no	-6.713	+0.00
Processing: Dry Baked	no	-6.713	+0.00
Processing: Dry Extruded	no	-6.713	+0.00
Processing: Dry Semi Moist	no	-6.174	+0.00
Processing: Dry Muesli	no	-10.146	+0.00
Processing: Wet Pate	yes	-0.672	-0.67
Processing: Wet Chunks	no	-0.672	+0.00

Processing-type offset: -0.08
Additives declared on label: +1 transparency bonus
Subtotal: 59.5
Final score: 60/100

Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.

Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges

How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.

Nutrient	As fed (label)	Dry matter (scored)	Score
Protein	9.9	43 (band 20.543478260869563 to 40%)	100
Fat	5.9	25.7 (band 6.2771739130434785 to 20%)	100
Fibre	0.6	2.6 (band 0.5 to 5%)	98.1
Calcium	0.4	1.7 (band 0.5706521739130435 to 2.5%)	100
Phosphorus	0.3	1.3 (band 0.4565217391304348 to 1.6%)	100
Calcium:phosphorus ratio	1.3	1.3 (band 1 to 2%)	90
Omega fatty acids (omega-6 and omega-3)	-	-	100
Energy (kcal/100g)	105	456.5	100

Omega fatty acids (omega-6 and omega-3): scored as the mean of its declared components (omega-6 100). The FEDIAF minimum for omega-6 is linoleic acid specifically.

Scored over 8 declared nutrients (combined weight 100); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score.

Declared fortification: 4 nutritional additives on the label

Vitamin D3 200 IE/kg
Zink (als Zinksulfat, Monohydrat) 25 mg/kg
Mangan (als Mangan(II)-sulfat, Monohydrat) 1.4 mg/kg
L-Carnitin 200 mg/kg

High confidence: full analysis plus minerals or omegas and declared energy.

This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.

Transparency: what the label discloses

How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.

Item	Points
✓ Ingredient list on the label (mandatory)	10/10
✓ Printed percentages on the label (60% of the recipe mass) (voluntary)	12/20
✓ Analytical constituents declared (mandatory)	15/15
✓ Additives declared (mandatory)	5/10
✓ Energy value declared (voluntary)	5/5
✓ Complete/complementary designation (mandatory)	5/5
✓ Feeding guidance given (mandatory)	10/10
✓ Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory)	5/10
✓ Country of manufacture stated (voluntary)	10/10
✗ Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file	0/5

Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Batch and date labelling).

Safety: recall history

Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.

No recalls recorded in our database.

See all current recalls we track.

Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it

The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.

50/100 · limited — 2 checkable claims: 1 consistent, 1 contradicted.

Contradicted by the label

"Nur ein Protein" — the declared label says otherwise on single protein.

Consistent with the label

"100% Getreidefrei" — supported by the declared grain-free data.

8 further claims on file that we cannot check against the label.

Limited: at least one claim contradicts the declared label, or a recent upheld ASA ruling applies.

Claim	Type	Check	Substantiation
100% Getreidefrei (on page)	Free-from	consistent	Manufacturer assertion
Hochverträglich (on page)	Functional	not checkable	Manufacturer assertion
Rassenspezififisch (on page)	Functional	not checkable	Manufacturer assertion
Nur ein Protein (on page)	Content	contradicted	Manufacturer assertion
mit frischem Lammfleisch (on page)	Content	not checkable	Manufacturer assertion
Hoher Fleischanteil (on page)	Content	not checkable	Manufacturer assertion
Für Retriever-Rassen entwickelt (on page)	Functional	not checkable	Manufacturer assertion
92% aller Kunden berichten, dass ihr Hund das Futter sehr gut verträgt (on page)	Functional	not checkable	Manufacturer assertion
85% bewerten die Akzeptanz des Futters als ausgezeichnet (on page)	Functional	not checkable	Manufacturer assertion
65% konnten bereits in den ersten 4 Wochen eine deutliche Verbesserung der Magen-Darm-Gesundheit feststellen (on page)	Functional	not checkable	Manufacturer assertion