GranataPet Liebling's Mahlzeit - Kalb & Kaninchen

Wet Pate · completeClear labelFull label

Liebling's Mahlzeit - Kalb & Kaninchen
Average
our rating

Our verdict

Is GranataPet Liebling's Mahlzeit - Kalb & Kaninchen a good dog food?

We score it 68/100 (Average). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.

How we score

Why you might choose it

  • Prints ingredient percentages on the label.
  • Prints a percentage for nearly every ingredient, so the recipe is fully auditable.
  • Doesn't list grain ingredients.

Why you might not

  • Around 63% of the recipe is generic or unspecified ingredients.

Who is this food for?

Suits

  • Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
  • Grain-free: no grain ingredients listed
  • Doesn't list chicken, turkey, lamb, fish, venison, pork, duck as ingredients

Consider something else if:

  • Your dog avoids beef: it is listed as an ingredient
  • You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein

These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.

Nutrition and feedingProtein NaN% · Fat NaN%

Typical analysis (as fed)

NutrientAs fed
ProteinNaN%
FatNaN%
FibreNaN%
AshNaN%
MoistureNaN%

Additives & feeding info

No additives recorded yet.

Ingredients (14)0% of the recipe is estimated

Estimated composition

  • unknown 48.4%
  • meat 41.0%
  • veg 9.0%
  • supplement 1.1%
  • oil 0.5%
#As declaredMatchedLabel readingDeclared %Est. %
112% Veal 40% consisting of muscle meatMuscle Meatmeat · good1212.0
212% heartHeartmeat · good1212.0
312% lungLungmeat · medium1212.0
412% tripeTripemeat · medium1212.0
5Rabbit 25% consisting of muscle meatMuscle Meatmeat · good-0.05
612% heartHeartmeat · good1212.0
75% liverLivermeat · good55.0
8Veal and Rabbit Broth 24.4%Cooking brothother · medium24.424.4
9Courgette 5%Courgetteveg · good55.0
10Pumpkin 3%Pumpkinveg · good33.0
11Pomegranate Seeds 1%Pomegranate Seedsveg · good11.0
12Minerals 1%Vitamins and mineralssupplement · medium11.0
13Flaxseed Oil 0.5%Linseed oiloil · good0.50.5
140.05% naturally rich in glucosamine and chondroitinChondroitinsupplement · good0.050.05
  1. 1. 12% Veal 40% consisting of muscle meat12% declared12.0% estimated
    Muscle Meat · meat · good
  2. 2. 12% heart12% declared12.0% estimated
    Heart · meat · good
  3. 3. 12% lung12% declared12.0% estimated
    Lung · meat · medium
  4. 4. 12% tripe12% declared12.0% estimated
    Tripe · meat · medium
  5. 5. Rabbit 25% consisting of muscle meat0.05% estimated
    Muscle Meat · meat · good
  6. 6. 12% heart12% declared12.0% estimated
    Heart · meat · good
  7. 7. 5% liver5% declared5.0% estimated
    Liver · meat · good
  8. 8. Veal and Rabbit Broth 24.4%24.4% declared24.4% estimated
    Cooking broth · other · medium
  9. 9. Courgette 5%5% declared5.0% estimated
    Courgette · veg · good
  10. 10. Pumpkin 3%3% declared3.0% estimated
    Pumpkin · veg · good
  11. 11. Pomegranate Seeds 1%1% declared1.0% estimated
    Pomegranate Seeds · veg · good
  12. 12. Minerals 1%1% declared1.0% estimated
    Vitamins and minerals · supplement · medium
  13. 13. Flaxseed Oil 0.5%0.5% declared0.5% estimated
    Linseed oil · oil · good
  14. 14. 0.05% naturally rich in glucosamine and chondroitin0.05% declared0.05% estimated
    Chondroitin · supplement · good

Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-27

Brand and contact: GranataPet

Trust and provenance

Recall history
No recalls recorded in our database
Label data last checked
2026-09-27
Scored with
Model v3 (methodology)
Product page
www.granatapet.de

Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.

External platform ratings are not scores for this individual recipe.

Trustpilot: 4.7/5 · 441 reviews

Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.

Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence

Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated

Why this score?

The overall score is 68 out of 100. The overall quality of the ingredient list contributed +2.9 points, and the meat content contributed +2.9 points. Ingredients we could not classify deducted -1.7 points, and the processing format deducted -0.7 points.

Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.

ComponentInputCoefficientContribution
Base score-30.909+30.91
Average ingredient quality0.39.191+2.90
Meat share of dry matter29.8%0.096+2.86
Oil share of dry matter1.3%-0.092-0.12
Vegetable share of dry matter3.5%-0.005-0.02
Supplement share of dry matter2.5%-0.012-0.03
Unrecognised share of dry matter62.9%-0.027-1.67
Undeclared quantities0.1%-0.106-0.01
Processing multiplier1.0033.786+33.79
Processing: Wet Pateyes-0.672-0.67
Show all 40 components
ComponentInputCoefficientContribution
Base score-30.909+30.91
Average ingredient quality0.39.191+2.90
Meat share of dry matter29.8%0.096+2.86
Carb share of dry matter0.0%-0.115+0.00
Oil share of dry matter1.3%-0.092-0.12
Vegetable share of dry matter3.5%-0.005-0.02
Additive share of dry matter0.0%0.163+0.00
Supplement share of dry matter2.5%-0.012-0.03
Other share of dry matter0.0%-0.375+0.00
Unrecognised share of dry matter62.9%-0.027-1.67
Recipe graded poor0.0%-0.065+0.00
Poor-quality meat in recipe0.0%-0.179+0.00
Number of poor ingredients0-0.876+0.00
Largest single poor ingredient0.0%0.060+0.00
Undeclared quantities0.1%-0.106-0.01
Prints ingredient percentagesno0.000+0.00
Complete dietno2.294+0.00
Frozen or chilled freshno0.000+0.00
High meat (30%+ of dry matter)no0.707+0.00
Low meat (under 10% of dry matter)no-3.158+0.00
High carb and low meatno-1.180+0.00
Meat share × printed percentages0.00.000+0.00
Meat share × fresh0.00.000+0.00
Fresh × high meat0.011.084+0.00
Additive penalty0.000.222+0.00
Processing multiplier1.0033.786+33.79
Processing: Rawno-0.054+0.00
Processing: Fresh Chilledno-2.354+0.00
Processing: Fresh Frozenno-2.354+0.00
Processing: Fresh Refrigeratedno0.000+0.00
Processing: Fresh Shelfno-0.672+0.00
Processing: Dry Freeze Driedno6.629+0.00
Processing: Dry Air Driedno6.331+0.00
Processing: Dry Cold Pressedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Bakedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Extrudedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Semi Moistno-6.174+0.00
Processing: Dry Mueslino-10.146+0.00
Processing: Wet Pateyes-0.672-0.67
Processing: Wet Chunksno-0.672+0.00
Processing-type offset
-0.08
Subtotal
67.9
Final score
68/100

Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.

Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges

Analytical constituents not declared

No nutritional additives section declared on the label.

Transparency: what the label discloses

How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.

ItemPoints
✓ Ingredient list on the label (mandatory)10/10
✓ Printed percentages on the label (100% of the recipe mass) (voluntary)20/20
✗ Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file0/15
✗ Additives declared (mandatory) - not on file0/10
✗ Energy value declared (voluntary) - not on file0/5
✓ Complete/complementary designation (mandatory)5/5
✗ Feeding guidance given (mandatory) - not on file0/10
✓ Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory)5/10
✓ Country of manufacture stated (voluntary)10/10
✗ Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file0/5

Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared, Additives declared, Feeding guidance given, Batch and date labelling).

Safety: recall history

Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.

No recalls recorded in our database.

See all current recalls we track.

Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it

No on-pack claims on file: nothing to verify.

The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.

Alternatives to Liebling's Mahlzeit - Kalb & Kaninchen

Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.

See all alternatives

See all products from GranataPet

Community0 comments

Owners' verdict
0 votes

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.

Comments are reviewed before they appear.