Bellfor Landgut-Menü
Wet Pate · completeHigh insect proteinClear label
Our verdict
Is Bellfor Landgut-Menü a good dog food?
We score it 81/100 (Good). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for all lifestages
- Grain-free: no grain ingredients listed
- Single named protein: insect
- Doesn't list chicken, beef, turkey, lamb, fish, venison, pork, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- You are limiting fat: 29.5% on a dry-matter basis is in the high band
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Nutrition and feedingProtein 7.50% · Fat 6.50%
Typical analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed |
|---|---|
| Protein | 7.50% |
| Fat | 6.50% |
| Fibre | 0.70% |
| Ash | 2.30% |
| Moisture | 78% |
| Calcium | 0.49% |
| Phosphorus | 0.32% |
| Sodium | 0.25% |
Energy: 102.43 kcal/100g
Additives & feeding info
Feeding and storage
Storage
Bitte kühl und trocken lagern. Innerhalb weniger Tage verbrauchen.
Feeding guide
1-2 kg: 75-175 g; 2-4 kg: 175-265 g; 4-6 kg: 265-350 g; 6-8 kg: 350-435 g; 8-10 kg: 435-500 g per 24h
Additives declared on the label
Nutritional additives
Vitamin A 2025 IE/kg; Vitamin D3 170 IE/kg; Zink (als Zinksulfat, Monohydrat) 10 mg/kg; Kupfer (als Kupfersulfat, Pentahydrat) 1,0 mg/kg; Jod (als Kalzium-Jodat, wasserfrei) 0,5 mg/kg; Selen (als Natriumselenit) 0,06 mg/kg
Ingredients (9)24% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- meat 79.9%
- veg 10.6%
- carb 7.9%
- supplement 1.3%
- oil 0.1%
- unknown 0.1%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Insects (Black Soldier Fly) 61% | Insects | meat · good | 61 | 61.0 |
| 2 | Carrots 7% | Carrots | veg · good | 7 | 7.0 |
| 3 | Sweet Potatoes 6% | Sweet Potatoes | carb · good | 6 | 6.0 |
| 4 | Minerals 1% | Vitamins and minerals | supplement · medium | 1 | 1.0 |
| 5 | Cranberry 0.5% | Cranberries | veg · good | 0.5 | 0.5 |
| 6 | Apple 0.5% | Apples | veg · good | 0.5 | 0.5 |
| 7 | Linseed Oil 0.1% | Linseed oil | oil · good | 0.1 | 0.1 |
| 8 | Rosemary 0.1% | Rosemary | veg · good | 0.1 | 0.1 |
| 9 | Oregano Leaves 0.1% | Oregano | veg · good | 0.1 | 0.1 |
- 1. Insects (Black Soldier Fly) 61%61% declared61.0% estimated
- 2. Carrots 7%7% declared7.0% estimated
- 3. Sweet Potatoes 6%6% declared6.0% estimated
- 4. Minerals 1%1% declared1.0% estimated
- 5. Cranberry 0.5%0.5% declared0.5% estimated
- 6. Apple 0.5%0.5% declared0.5% estimated
- 7. Linseed Oil 0.1%0.1% declared0.1% estimated
- 8. Rosemary 0.1%0.1% declared0.1% estimated
- 9. Oregano Leaves 0.1%0.1% declared0.1% estimated
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-19
Brand and contact: Bellfor
- Website
- https://www.bellfor.info/
- [email protected]
- Phone
- +49 2255 957 39 96
- Address
- Marsapet GmbH, Gewerbepark Odendorf 22, 53913 Swisttal, Deutschland
- Contact page
- www.bellfor.info
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-19
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- www.bellfor.info
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Brand and retailer reviews
External platform ratings are not scores for this individual recipe.
Trustpilot: 4.0/5 · 9 reviews
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
The overall score is 81 out of 100. The overall quality of the ingredient list contributed +9 points, and the meat content contributed +7.9 points. Ingredients without printed percentages reduced the score by -2.5, while being labelled nutritionally complete added +2.3 points.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 1.0 | 9.191 | +8.97 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 81.9% | 0.096 | +7.86 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 7.2% | -0.115 | -0.83 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 0.5% | -0.092 | -0.04 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 5.8% | -0.005 | -0.03 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 4.4% | -0.012 | -0.05 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.2% | -0.027 | -0.01 |
| Undeclared quantities | 23.7% | -0.106 | -2.50 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | yes | 0.707 | +0.71 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 33.786 | +33.79 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | yes | -0.672 | -0.67 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 1.0 | 9.191 | +8.97 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 81.9% | 0.096 | +7.86 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 7.2% | -0.115 | -0.83 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 0.5% | -0.092 | -0.04 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 5.8% | -0.005 | -0.03 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.163 | +0.00 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 4.4% | -0.012 | -0.05 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.375 | +0.00 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.2% | -0.027 | -0.01 |
| Recipe graded poor | 0.0% | -0.065 | +0.00 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 0 | -0.876 | +0.00 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 0.0% | 0.060 | +0.00 |
| Undeclared quantities | 23.7% | -0.106 | -2.50 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | yes | 0.707 | +0.71 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | no | -3.158 | +0.00 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | 0.00 | 0.222 | +0.00 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 33.786 | +33.79 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | yes | -0.672 | -0.67 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- -0.08
- Additives declared on label
- +1 transparency bonus
- Subtotal
- 81.3
- Final score
- 81/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 7.5 | 34.1 (band 20.951590909090914 to 40%) | 100 |
| Fat | 6.5 | 29.5 (band 6.401875000000001 to 20%) | 100 |
| Fibre | 0.7 | 3.2 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 100 |
| Calcium | 0.49 | 2.2 (band 0.5819886363636365 to 2.5%) | 100 |
| Phosphorus | 0.32 | 1.5 (band 0.4655909090909092 to 1.6%) | 100 |
| Sodium | 0.25 | 1.1 (band 0.1163977272727273+%) | 100 |
| Calcium:phosphorus ratio | 1.5 | 1.5 (band 1 to 2%) | 100 |
| Energy (kcal/100g) | 102.43 | 465.6 | 100 |
Scored over 8 declared nutrients (combined weight 95); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score.
Declared fortification: 6 nutritional additives on the label
- Vitamin A 2025 IE/kg
- Vitamin D3 170 IE/kg
- Zink (als Zinksulfat, Monohydrat) 10 mg/kg
- Kupfer (als Kupfersulfat, Pentahydrat) 1,0 mg/kg
- Jod (als Kalzium-Jodat, wasserfrei) 0,5 mg/kg
- Selen (als Natriumselenit) 0,06 mg/kg
High confidence: full analysis plus minerals or omegas and declared energy.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (76.3% of the recipe mass) (voluntary) | 15.3/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) | 15/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) | 5/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
See all current recalls we track.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
100/100 · moderate — 1 checkable claim: 1 consistent, 0 contradicted.
Consistent with the label
- "getreidefreies Nassfutter" — supported by the declared grain-free data.
8 further claims on file that we cannot check against the label.
Moderate: every checkable claim is consistent with the declared label.
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| hypoallergenes Hundefutter auf Basis der Schwarzen Soldatenfliegenlarve (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| hohe Verdaulichkeit (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| unterstützt das Immunsystem (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Frei von synthetischen Zusätzen (on page) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| sehr niedriger Puringehalt (4,3 mg pro 100 g) (on page) | Nutrient | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Regionales Obst & Gemüse (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Sehr hoher Fleischanteil (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| getreidefreies Nassfutter (on page) | Free-from | consistent | Manufacturer assertion |
| wird nach dem Lebensmittelstandard produziert (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Alternatives to Landgut-Menü
Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.