Embark on Raw Lamb & Duck

Raw complete High meat Clear label Full label

Lamb & Duck
Good
our rating

Is Embark on Raw Lamb & Duck a good dog food?

We score it 95/100 (Good). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.

How we score

Why this score?

The overall score is 95 out of 100. The meat content contributed +9.6 points, and the overall quality of the ingredient list added +4.6. Being labelled nutritionally complete contributed a further +2.3, while the processing format deducted -0.1.

The Recipe score measures how attractive and transparent the declared ingredient list is. It is not, by itself, proof that the food is nutritionally appropriate for long-term feeding. The Nutritional and Evidence scores measure what we can verify towards that stronger claim.

Complete raw food for dogs of all life stages, with lamb, duck and offal as the main ingredients.

Estimated composition

meat100.0%

Typical analysis (as fed)

Protein
16.10%
Fat
17.70%
Fibre
0.30%
Ash
1.90%
Moisture
64.30%
Carbohydrates
0%

Additives & feeding info

No additives recorded yet.

Who is this food for?

Suits

  • Labelled by the manufacturer for all lifestages
  • Grain-free: no grain ingredients listed
  • Doesn't list chicken, beef, turkey, fish, venison, pork as ingredients

Consider something else if:

  • Your dog avoids lamb: the label lists lamb
  • Your dog avoids duck: the label lists duck
  • You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein
  • You are limiting fat: 49.6% on a dry-matter basis is in the high band

These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Use the homepage filter to find foods that fit your dog.

Ingredients (3)

#As declaredMatchedCategoryTierDeclared %Est. %
160% British LambLambmeatmedium6060.0
230% British Duck with boneDuckmeatmedium3030.0
310% British Lamb OffalOffalmeatmedium1010.0

Brand

Trust and provenance

Recall history
No recalls recorded in our database
Label data last checked
2026-10-07
Scored with
Model v3 (methodology)
Product page
embarkonraw.co.uk

Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.

Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.

Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated

Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-07. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.

ComponentInputCoefficientContribution
Base score-30.909+30.91
Average ingredient quality0.59.191+4.60
Meat share of dry matter100.0%0.096+9.60
Complete dietyes2.294+2.29
High meat (30%+ of dry matter)yes0.707+0.71
Fresh × high meat1.011.084+11.08
Processing multiplier1.1233.786+37.84
Processing: Rawyes-0.054-0.05
Show all 40 components
ComponentInputCoefficientContribution
Base score-30.909+30.91
Average ingredient quality0.59.191+4.60
Meat share of dry matter100.0%0.096+9.60
Carb share of dry matter0.0%-0.115+0.00
Oil share of dry matter0.0%-0.092+0.00
Vegetable share of dry matter0.0%-0.005+0.00
Additive share of dry matter0.0%0.163+0.00
Supplement share of dry matter0.0%-0.012+0.00
Other share of dry matter0.0%-0.375+0.00
Unrecognised share of dry matter0.0%-0.027+0.00
Recipe graded poor0.0%-0.065+0.00
Poor-quality meat in recipe0.0%-0.179+0.00
Number of poor ingredients0-0.876+0.00
Largest single poor ingredient0.0%0.060+0.00
Undeclared quantities0.0%-0.106+0.00
Prints ingredient percentagesno0.000+0.00
Complete dietyes2.294+2.29
Frozen or chilled freshno0.000+0.00
High meat (30%+ of dry matter)yes0.707+0.71
Low meat (under 10% of dry matter)no-3.158+0.00
High carb and low meatno-1.180+0.00
Meat share × printed percentages0.00.000+0.00
Meat share × fresh0.00.000+0.00
Fresh × high meat1.011.084+11.08
Additive penalty0.000.222+0.00
Processing multiplier1.1233.786+37.84
Processing: Rawyes-0.054-0.05
Processing: Fresh Chilledno-2.354+0.00
Processing: Fresh Frozenno-2.354+0.00
Processing: Fresh Refrigeratedno0.000+0.00
Processing: Fresh Shelfno-0.672+0.00
Processing: Dry Freeze Driedno6.629+0.00
Processing: Dry Air Driedno6.331+0.00
Processing: Dry Cold Pressedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Bakedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Extrudedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Semi Moistno-6.174+0.00
Processing: Dry Mueslino-10.146+0.00
Processing: Wet Pateno-0.672+0.00
Processing: Wet Chunksno-0.672+0.00
Processing-type offset
-1.74
Subtotal
95.2
Final score
95/100

Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.

Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges

How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.

NutrientAs fed (label)Dry matter (scored)Score
Protein16.145.1 (band 18 to 40%)100
Fat17.749.6 (band 5.5 to 20%)100
Fibre0.30.8 (band 0.5 to 5%)74.5

Scored over 3 declared nutrients (combined weight 50); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score.

No nutritional additives section declared on the label.

Medium confidence: the full five-part analysis is on file; where moisture was not declared it was estimated from the food type.

This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.

Transparency: what the label discloses

How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.

ItemPoints
✓ Ingredient list on the label (mandatory)10/10
✓ Printed percentages on the label (100% of the recipe mass) (voluntary)20/20
✓ Analytical constituents declared (mandatory)15/15
✗ Additives declared (mandatory) - not on file0/10
✗ Energy value declared (voluntary) - not on file0/5
✓ Complete/complementary designation (mandatory)5/5
✗ Feeding guidance given (mandatory) - not on file0/10
✓ Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory)5/10
✓ Country of manufacture stated (voluntary)10/10
✗ Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file0/5

Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Additives declared, Feeding guidance given, Batch and date labelling).

Safety: recall history

Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.

No recalls recorded in our database.

See all current recalls we track.

Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it

The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.

80/100 · limited — 5 checkable claims: 4 consistent, 1 contradicted.

Contradicted by the label

  • "LOW FAT" — the declared label says otherwise on low fat.

Consistent with the label

  • "100% British meat" — supported by the declared made in the UK data.
  • "Totally grain free" — supported by the declared grain-free data.
  • "GRAIN FREE" — supported by the declared grain-free data.
  • "Made in Yorkshire" — supported by the declared made in the UK data.

9 further claims on file that we cannot check against the label.

Limited: at least one claim contradicts the declared label, or a recent upheld ASA ruling applies.

ClaimTypeCheckSubstantiation
100% British meat (on pack)ContentconsistentManufacturer assertion
no additives or preservatives (on pack)Free-fromnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Totally grain free (on pack)Free-fromconsistentManufacturer assertion
GRAIN FREE (on pack)Free-fromconsistentManufacturer assertion
POULTRY FREE (on pack)Contentnot checkableManufacturer assertion
LOW FAT (on pack)High/low levelcontradictedManufacturer assertion
NOTHING ARTIFICIAL (on pack)Free-fromnot checkableManufacturer assertion
VEG FREE (on pack)Contentnot checkableManufacturer assertion
HUMAN GRADE INGREDIENTS (on pack)Contentnot checkableManufacturer assertion
VET APPROVED (on pack)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
FRESH, REAL FOOD (on pack)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
FROZEN FOR FRESHNESS (on pack)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Made in Yorkshire (on page)ContentconsistentManufacturer assertion
100% plastic-free packaging (on page)Contentnot checkableManufacturer assertion

The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.

Other products from Embark on Raw

See all products from Embark on Raw

Alternatives to Lamb & Duck

Foods in our database that are similar on ingredients, protein, format or price. Scores and figures are from the same deterministic model used everywhere on the site.

See all alternatives

Community

Owners' verdict
0 votes

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.

Comments are reviewed before they appear.