DOGS Premium Hundefutter Kalb & Rind – Getreidefrei
Dry Extruded · completeHigh meatClear label
Our verdict
Is DOGS Premium Hundefutter Kalb & Rind – Getreidefrei a good dog food?
We score it 57/100 (Average). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
Only part of the analytical constituents are declared, so the nutritional picture is incomplete.
32% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
- Grain-free: no grain ingredients listed
- Doesn't list lamb, venison, pork, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids chicken: the label lists hydrolysed poultry
- Your dog avoids beef: the label lists beef
- Your dog avoids turkey: the label lists hydrolysed poultry
- Your dog avoids fish: the label lists green-lipped mussel
- You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Nutrition and feedingProtein 22.50% · Fat 13%
Typical analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed |
|---|---|
| Protein | 22.50% |
| Fat | 13% |
| Fibre | 4% |
| Ash | 8.10% |
Additives & feeding info
No additives recorded yet.
Ingredients (25)32% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- carb 42.4%
- meat 29.6%
- oil 11.6%
- supplement 9.1%
- fibre 4.2%
- veg 3.1%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Potato flakes and sweet potatoes dried 38% | Sweet Potatoes | carb · good | 38 | 38.0 |
| 2 | veal and beef meal 26% | Beef | meat · medium | 26 | 26.0 |
| 3 | beef tallow | Tallow | oil · medium | - | 4.6 |
| 4 | rapeseed meal | Rapeseed Meal | carb · medium | - | 4.4 |
| 5 | sugar beet pulp | Beet Pulp | fibre · medium | - | 4.1 |
| 6 | extruded linseed | Extruded Linseed | oil · medium | - | 3.8 |
| 7 | poultry hydrolysate | Hydrolysed Poultry | meat · medium | - | 3.6 |
| 8 | brewer's yeast 3% | Brewer's Yeast | supplement · good | 3 | 3.0 |
| 9 | minerals | Vitamins and minerals | supplement · medium | - | 3.3 |
| 10 | sunflower oil | Sunflower oil | oil · good | - | 3.1 |
| 11 | carrots | Carrots | veg · good | - | 2.8 |
| 12 | seaweed meal | Seaweed Meal | supplement · medium | - | 2.6 |
| 13 | 0.03% dandelion | Dandelion Root | veg · good | 0.03 | 0.03 |
| 14 | 0.03% horsetail | Horsetail | veg · medium | 0.03 | 0.03 |
| 15 | 0.03% comfrey leaves | Comfrey Leaves | veg · medium | 0.03 | 0.03 |
| 16 | 0.03% borage | Borage oil | oil · good | 0.03 | 0.03 |
| 17 | 0.03% coneflower | Coneflower Herb (Echinacea) | supplement · medium | 0.03 | 0.03 |
| 18 | 0.03% devil's claw root | Devil's Claw Root | veg · good | 0.03 | 0.03 |
| 19 | 0.05% rosehip | Rose Hip | veg · good | 0.05 | 0.05 |
| 20 | 0.05% blackberry | Blackberries | veg · good | 0.05 | 0.05 |
| 21 | 0.05% blueberry | Blueberries | veg · good | 0.05 | 0.05 |
| 22 | 0.05% blackcurrant | Blackcurrant | veg · good | 0.05 | 0.05 |
| 23 | chondroitin sulfate from New Zealand green-lipped mussel 0.12% | Green-Lipped Mussel | supplement · good | 0.12 | 0.1 |
| 24 | prebiotic inulin 0.1% | Inulin | fibre · good | 0.1 | 0.1 |
| 25 | Yucca schidigera 0.1% | Yucca Schidigera | supplement · good | 0.1 | 0.1 |
- 1. Potato flakes and sweet potatoes dried 38%38% declared38.0% estimated
- 2. veal and beef meal 26%26% declared26.0% estimated
- 3. beef tallow4.6% estimated
- 4. rapeseed meal4.4% estimated
- 5. sugar beet pulp4.1% estimated
- 6. extruded linseed3.8% estimated
- 7. poultry hydrolysate3.6% estimated
- 8. brewer's yeast 3%3% declared3.0% estimated
- 9. minerals3.3% estimated
- 10. sunflower oil3.1% estimated
- 11. carrots2.8% estimated
- 12. seaweed meal2.6% estimated
- 13. 0.03% dandelion0.03% declared0.03% estimated
- 14. 0.03% horsetail0.03% declared0.03% estimated
- 15. 0.03% comfrey leaves0.03% declared0.03% estimated
- 16. 0.03% borage0.03% declared0.03% estimated
- 17. 0.03% coneflower0.03% declared0.03% estimated
- 18. 0.03% devil's claw root0.03% declared0.03% estimated
- 19. 0.05% rosehip0.05% declared0.05% estimated
- 20. 0.05% blackberry0.05% declared0.05% estimated
- 21. 0.05% blueberry0.05% declared0.05% estimated
- 22. 0.05% blackcurrant0.05% declared0.05% estimated
- 23. chondroitin sulfate from New Zealand green-lipped mussel 0.12%0.12% declared0.1% estimated
- 24. prebiotic inulin 0.1%0.1% declared0.1% estimated
- 25. Yucca schidigera 0.1%0.1% declared0.1% estimated
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-27
Brand and contact: DOGS
- Phone
- 0178/68 66 555
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-27
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- dogs-heart.de
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Brand and retailer reviews
External platform ratings are not scores for this individual recipe.
Trustpilot: 4.8/5 · 342 reviews
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
This recipe achieves an overall score of 57 out of 100 based on several key factors. The overall quality of the ingredient list positively influences the result by contributing +6.7 points. However, the processing format detracts from the total with a change of -6.7. Similarly, the carbohydrate content impacts the score by -4.9, and ingredients without printed percentages further adjust the final result by -3.4.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.7 | 9.191 | +6.71 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 26.7% | 0.096 | +2.57 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 42.6% | -0.115 | -4.90 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 12.8% | -0.092 | -1.18 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 9.4% | -0.012 | -0.11 |
| Undeclared quantities | 32.3% | -0.106 | -3.41 |
| Processing multiplier | 0.98 | 33.786 | +33.11 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.7 | 9.191 | +6.71 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 26.7% | 0.096 | +2.57 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 42.6% | -0.115 | -4.90 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 12.8% | -0.092 | -1.18 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 0.5% | -0.005 | -0.00 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.163 | +0.00 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 9.4% | -0.012 | -0.11 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.375 | +0.00 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.027 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 0.0% | -0.065 | +0.00 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 0 | -0.876 | +0.00 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 0.0% | 0.060 | +0.00 |
| Undeclared quantities | 32.3% | -0.106 | -3.41 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | no | 2.294 | +0.00 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | no | 0.707 | +0.00 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | no | -3.158 | +0.00 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | 0.00 | 0.222 | +0.00 |
| Processing multiplier | 0.98 | 33.786 | +33.11 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- +0.02
- Subtotal
- 57.0
- Final score
- 57/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 22.5 | 24.9 (band 18 to 40%) | 88.7 |
| Fat | 13 | 14.4 (band 5.5 to 20%) | 100 |
| Fibre | 4 | 4.4 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 100 |
Scored over 3 declared nutrients (combined weight 50); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score. Moisture was not declared and was estimated at 9.5% from the food type.
No nutritional additives section declared on the label.
Low confidence: partial analysis or moisture estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (67.7% of the recipe mass) (voluntary) | 13.5/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) - not on file | 0/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) - not on file | 0/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared, Additives declared, Feeding guidance given, Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
See all current recalls we track.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
No on-pack claims on file: nothing to verify.
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Alternatives to Premium Hundefutter Kalb & Rind – Getreidefrei
Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.