DOGS Lamm Hundefutter Monoprotein | Für sensible Hunde

Dry Extruded · completeClear label

49out of 100

Average

our rating

Our verdict

Is DOGS Lamm Hundefutter Monoprotein | Für sensible Hunde a good dog food?

We score it 49/100 (Average). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.

How we score

Only part of the analytical constituents are declared, so the nutritional picture is incomplete.

48% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.

Why you might choose it

Prints ingredient percentages on the label.
Doesn't list grain ingredients.
Nutritionally complete: formulated to be fed as the whole diet.

Why you might not

Around 37% of the recipe is generic or unspecified ingredients.
Meat makes up an estimated 0% of the dry matter; carbohydrates dominate.

Who is this food for?

Suits

Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
Grain-free: no grain ingredients listed
Doesn't list beef, venison, pork, duck as ingredients

Consider something else if:

Your dog avoids chicken: the label lists poultry fat
Your dog avoids turkey: the label lists poultry fat
Your dog avoids lamb: it is listed as an ingredient
Your dog avoids fish: the label lists green-lipped mussel
You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein

These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.

Nutrition and feedingProtein 22% · Fat 13.30%

Typical analysis (as fed)

Nutrient	As fed
Protein	22%
Fat	13.30%
Fibre	3.80%
Ash	9.50%

Additives & feeding info

No additives recorded yet.

Ingredients (23)48% of the recipe is estimated

Estimated composition

unknown 49.0%
veg 13.1%
supplement 11.9%
fibre 11.2%
carb 7.7%
oil 7.2%

#	As declared	Matched	Label reading	Declared %	Est. %
1	Lamb meat meal (24.76%)	Meat Meal	meat · medium	24.76	24.8
2	Potato and sweet potato (24.0%)	Sweet Potatoes	carb · good	24	24.0
3	Rapeseed meal	Rapeseed Meal	carb · medium	-	7.7
4	Poultry fat	Poultry Fat	oil · medium	-	7.2
5	extruded linseed	Extruded Linseed	oil · medium	-	6.7
6	Peas	Peas	veg · good	-	6.3
7	Brewer's yeast (2.33%)	Brewer's Yeast	supplement · good	2.33	2.3
8	Beet pulp	Beet Pulp	fibre · medium	-	5.8
9	Lignocellulose	Lignocellulose	fibre · medium	-	5.3
10	Seaweed meal	Seaweed Meal	supplement · medium	-	4.8
11	Mannan-oligosaccharides MOS (0.2%)	Mannanoligosaccharides	supplement · good	0.2	0.2
12	Chondroitin sulphate (0.1%)	Chondroitin	supplement · good	0.1	0.1
13	Green-lipped mussel meal (0.1%)	Green-Lipped Mussel	supplement · good	0.1	0.1
14	0.03% Dandelion herb	Dandelion Root	veg · good	0.03	0.03
15	0.03% Echinacea herb	Coneflower Herb (Echinacea)	supplement · medium	0.03	0.03
16	0.03% Devil's claw root	Devil's Claw Root	veg · good	0.03	0.03
17	0.03% Currant	Currant	veg · good	0.03	0.03
18	0.03% Blackberry	Blackberries	veg · good	0.03	0.03
19	0.03% Rosehip	Rose Hip	veg · good	0.03	0.03
20	0.03% Blueberry	Blueberries	veg · good	0.03	0.03
21	Inulin (0.1%)	Inulin	fibre · good	0.1	0.1
22	Yucca schidigera (0.1%)	Yucca Schidigera	supplement · good	0.1	0.1
23	L-carnitine	L-Carnitine	supplement · medium	-	4.3

1. Lamb meat meal (24.76%)24.76% declared24.8% estimated
Meat Meal · meat · medium
2. Potato and sweet potato (24.0%)24% declared24.0% estimated
Sweet Potatoes · carb · good
3. Rapeseed meal7.7% estimated
Rapeseed Meal · carb · medium
4. Poultry fat7.2% estimated
Poultry Fat · oil · medium
5. extruded linseed6.7% estimated
Extruded Linseed · oil · medium
6. Peas6.3% estimated
Peas · veg · good
7. Brewer's yeast (2.33%)2.33% declared2.3% estimated
Brewer's Yeast · supplement · good
8. Beet pulp5.8% estimated
Beet Pulp · fibre · medium
9. Lignocellulose5.3% estimated
Lignocellulose · fibre · medium
10. Seaweed meal4.8% estimated
Seaweed Meal · supplement · medium
11. Mannan-oligosaccharides MOS (0.2%)0.2% declared0.2% estimated
Mannanoligosaccharides · supplement · good
12. Chondroitin sulphate (0.1%)0.1% declared0.1% estimated
Chondroitin · supplement · good
13. Green-lipped mussel meal (0.1%)0.1% declared0.1% estimated
Green-Lipped Mussel · supplement · good
14. 0.03% Dandelion herb0.03% declared0.03% estimated
Dandelion Root · veg · good
15. 0.03% Echinacea herb0.03% declared0.03% estimated
Coneflower Herb (Echinacea) · supplement · medium
16. 0.03% Devil's claw root0.03% declared0.03% estimated
Devil's Claw Root · veg · good
17. 0.03% Currant0.03% declared0.03% estimated
Currant · veg · good
18. 0.03% Blackberry0.03% declared0.03% estimated
Blackberries · veg · good
19. 0.03% Rosehip0.03% declared0.03% estimated
Rose Hip · veg · good
20. 0.03% Blueberry0.03% declared0.03% estimated
Blueberries · veg · good
21. Inulin (0.1%)0.1% declared0.1% estimated
Inulin · fibre · good
22. Yucca schidigera (0.1%)0.1% declared0.1% estimated
Yucca Schidigera · supplement · good
23. L-carnitine4.3% estimated
L-Carnitine · supplement · medium

Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-27

Brand and contact: DOGS

DOGS

Website: https://dogs-heart.de/collections/hundefutter-kaufen
Phone: 0178/68 66 555

Trust and provenance

Recall history: No recalls recorded in our database
Label data last checked: 2026-09-27
Scored with: Model v3 (methodology)
Product page: dogs-heart.de

Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.

Brand and retailer reviews

External platform ratings are not scores for this individual recipe.

Trustpilot: 4.8/5 · 342 reviews

Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.

Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence

Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated

Why this score?

This recipe achieves an overall rating of 49 out of 100 based on several key factors. The overall quality of the ingredient list adds +3.6 points to the total. However, the processing format subtracts -6.7 points, and ingredients without printed percentages deduct -5.1 points. Additionally, the carbohydrate content contributes -1.2 points to the final assessment.

Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.

Component	Input	Coefficient	Contribution
Base score	-	30.909	+30.91
Average ingredient quality	0.4	9.191	+3.57
Carb share of dry matter	10.4%	-0.115	-1.20
Oil share of dry matter	10.7%	-0.092	-0.99
Vegetable share of dry matter	10.5%	-0.005	-0.05
Supplement share of dry matter	16.4%	-0.012	-0.20
Unrecognised share of dry matter	36.8%	-0.027	-0.98
Undeclared quantities	48.1%	-0.106	-5.08
Low meat (under 10% of dry matter)	yes	-3.158	-3.16
Processing multiplier	0.98	33.786	+33.11
Processing: Dry Extruded	yes	-6.713	-6.71

Show all 40 components

Component	Input	Coefficient	Contribution
Base score	-	30.909	+30.91
Average ingredient quality	0.4	9.191	+3.57
Meat share of dry matter	0.0%	0.096	+0.00
Carb share of dry matter	10.4%	-0.115	-1.20
Oil share of dry matter	10.7%	-0.092	-0.99
Vegetable share of dry matter	10.5%	-0.005	-0.05
Additive share of dry matter	0.0%	0.163	+0.00
Supplement share of dry matter	16.4%	-0.012	-0.20
Other share of dry matter	0.0%	-0.375	+0.00
Unrecognised share of dry matter	36.8%	-0.027	-0.98
Recipe graded poor	0.0%	-0.065	+0.00
Poor-quality meat in recipe	0.0%	-0.179	+0.00
Number of poor ingredients	0	-0.876	+0.00
Largest single poor ingredient	0.0%	0.060	+0.00
Undeclared quantities	48.1%	-0.106	-5.08
Prints ingredient percentages	no	0.000	+0.00
Complete diet	no	2.294	+0.00
Frozen or chilled fresh	no	0.000	+0.00
High meat (30%+ of dry matter)	no	0.707	+0.00
Low meat (under 10% of dry matter)	yes	-3.158	-3.16
High carb and low meat	no	-1.180	+0.00
Meat share × printed percentages	0.0	0.000	+0.00
Meat share × fresh	0.0	0.000	+0.00
Fresh × high meat	0.0	11.084	+0.00
Additive penalty	0.00	0.222	+0.00
Processing multiplier	0.98	33.786	+33.11
Processing: Raw	no	-0.054	+0.00
Processing: Fresh Chilled	no	-2.354	+0.00
Processing: Fresh Frozen	no	-2.354	+0.00
Processing: Fresh Refrigerated	no	0.000	+0.00
Processing: Fresh Shelf	no	-0.672	+0.00
Processing: Dry Freeze Dried	no	6.629	+0.00
Processing: Dry Air Dried	no	6.331	+0.00
Processing: Dry Cold Pressed	no	-6.713	+0.00
Processing: Dry Baked	no	-6.713	+0.00
Processing: Dry Extruded	yes	-6.713	-6.71
Processing: Dry Semi Moist	no	-6.174	+0.00
Processing: Dry Muesli	no	-10.146	+0.00
Processing: Wet Pate	no	-0.672	+0.00
Processing: Wet Chunks	no	-0.672	+0.00

Processing-type offset: +0.02
Subtotal: 49.2
Final score: 49/100

Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.

Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges

How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.

Nutrient	As fed (label)	Dry matter (scored)	Score
Protein	22	24.3 (band 18 to 40%)	87.2
Fat	13.3	14.7 (band 5.5 to 20%)	100
Fibre	3.8	4.2 (band 0.5 to 5%)	100

Scored over 3 declared nutrients (combined weight 50); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score. Moisture was not declared and was estimated at 9.5% from the food type.

No nutritional additives section declared on the label.

Low confidence: partial analysis or moisture estimated from the food type.

This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.

Transparency: what the label discloses

How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.

Item	Points
✓ Ingredient list on the label (mandatory)	10/10
✓ Printed percentages on the label (51.9% of the recipe mass) (voluntary)	10.4/20
✗ Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file	0/15
✗ Additives declared (mandatory) - not on file	0/10
✗ Energy value declared (voluntary) - not on file	0/5
✓ Complete/complementary designation (mandatory)	5/5
✗ Feeding guidance given (mandatory) - not on file	0/10
✓ Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory)	5/10
✓ Country of manufacture stated (voluntary)	10/10
✗ Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file	0/5

Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared, Additives declared, Feeding guidance given, Batch and date labelling).

Safety: recall history

Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.

No recalls recorded in our database.

See all current recalls we track.

Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it

No on-pack claims on file: nothing to verify.

The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.

Alternatives to Lamm Hundefutter Monoprotein | Für sensible Hunde

Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.

Adult Small Breed Lamb with Sweet Potato & Mint67

Seven · Dry Extruded

Adult Lamb, Sweet Potato & Mint67