Our verdict
Is defu Junior Bio-Geflügel a good dog food?
We score it 47/100 (Average). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
Only part of the analytical constituents are declared, so the nutritional picture is incomplete.
64% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for puppies
- Doesn't list beef, lamb, fish, venison, pork, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids chicken: the label lists poultry
- Your dog avoids turkey: the label lists poultry
- Your dog avoids grain: the label lists rice - white
- You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Nutrition and feedingProtein 26% · Fat 14%
Typical analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed |
|---|---|
| Protein | 26% |
| Fat | 14% |
| Fibre | 3% |
| Ash | 7% |
| Calcium | 1.50% |
| Phosphorus | 1% |
Additives & feeding info
Feeding and storage
Storage
Kühl und trocken lagern. Luftdicht abgeschlossen aufbewahren.
Feeding guide
Tagesration auf 3 - 4, später auf 2 - 3 Mahlzeiten aufteilen. Bei Bedarf das Trockenfutter mit erwärmtem, frischem Wasser (ca. 40 °C) übergießen und einige Minuten ziehen lassen. Richtwerte je nach Alter und Endgewicht des Hundes (siehe Tabelle auf Seite).
Additives declared on the label
Nutritional additives
Vitamin A 18 000 I.E./kg; Vitamin D3 1000 I.E./kg; Vitamin E 140 mg/kg; Eisen (Eisen(II)-sulfat-Monohydrat) 100 mg/kg; Zink (Zinkoxid) 80 mg/kg; Mangan (Mangan(II)-oxid) 12 mg/kg; Kupfer (Kupfer(II)-sulfat-Pentahydrat) 10 mg/kg; Jod (Kalziumjodat, wasserfrei) 1 mg/kg; Selen (Natriumselenit) 0,15 mg/kg
Technological additives
Antioxidationsmittel: Tocopherol Extrakte aus pflanzlichen Ölen
Ingredients (12)64% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- carb 47.0%
- meat 29.0%
- other 8.9%
- mineral 7.8%
- oil 7.0%
- veg 0.2%
- unknown 0.1%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 29% Poultry | Poultry | meat · medium | 29 | 29.0 |
| 2 | Rice | Rice - white | carb · medium | - | 13.4 |
| 3 | Buckwheat | Buckwheat | carb · medium | - | 12.3 |
| 4 | Sorghum millet | Sorghum | carb · medium | - | 11.2 |
| 5 | Corn germ meal | Maize Germ Meal | carb · medium | - | 10.1 |
| 6 | 7% Poultry fat | Poultry Fat | oil · medium | 7 | 7.0 |
| 7 | Hydrolysed Protein | Protein Hydrolysate | other · poor | - | 8.9 |
| 8 | Sea salt | Sea Salt | mineral · medium | - | 7.8 |
| 9 | 0.2% Carrots | Carrots | veg · good | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| 10 | 0.02% Thyme | Thyme | veg · good | 0.02 | 0.02 |
| 11 | 0.02% Rosemary | Rosemary | veg · good | 0.02 | 0.02 |
| 12 | 0.02% Parsley | Parsley | veg · good | 0.02 | 0.02 |
- 1. 29% Poultry29% declared29.0% estimated
- 2. Rice13.4% estimated
- 3. Buckwheat12.3% estimated
- 4. Sorghum millet11.2% estimated
- 5. Corn germ meal10.1% estimated
- 6. 7% Poultry fat7% declared7.0% estimated
- 7. Hydrolysed Protein8.9% estimated
- 8. Sea salt7.8% estimated
- 9. 0.2% Carrots0.2% declared0.2% estimated
- 10. 0.02% Thyme0.02% declared0.02% estimated
- 11. 0.02% Rosemary0.02% declared0.02% estimated
- 12. 0.02% Parsley0.02% declared0.02% estimated
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-19
Brand and contact: defu
- Website
- https://www.defu.de/
- [email protected]
- Phone
- +49 (0) 6257 9340-15
- Contact page
- www.defu.de
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-19
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- www.defu.de
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
The food received an overall score of 47 out of 100. The carbohydrate content contributed -7 points, and ingredients without printed percentages contributed -6.7. The processing format added -6.7 points, while the overall quality of the ingredient list offset some of the losses with +3.8 points.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.4 | 9.191 | +3.84 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 11.8% | 0.096 | +1.14 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 60.6% | -0.115 | -6.97 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 10.1% | -0.092 | -0.93 |
| Other share of dry matter | 6.5% | -0.375 | -2.45 |
| Recipe graded poor | 8.9% | -0.065 | -0.58 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 1 | -0.876 | -0.88 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 8.9% | 0.060 | +0.54 |
| Undeclared quantities | 63.8% | -0.106 | -6.73 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| High carb and low meat | yes | -1.180 | -1.18 |
| Additive penalty | -0.16 | 0.222 | -0.03 |
| Processing multiplier | 0.98 | 33.786 | +33.11 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.4 | 9.191 | +3.84 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 11.8% | 0.096 | +1.14 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 60.6% | -0.115 | -6.97 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 10.1% | -0.092 | -0.93 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.005 | -0.00 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.163 | +0.00 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.012 | +0.00 |
| Other share of dry matter | 6.5% | -0.375 | -2.45 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.027 | -0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 8.9% | -0.065 | -0.58 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 1 | -0.876 | -0.88 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 8.9% | 0.060 | +0.54 |
| Undeclared quantities | 63.8% | -0.106 | -6.73 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | no | 0.707 | +0.00 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | no | -3.158 | +0.00 |
| High carb and low meat | yes | -1.180 | -1.18 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | -0.16 | 0.222 | -0.03 |
| Processing multiplier | 0.98 | 33.786 | +33.11 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- +0.02
- Additives declared on label
- +2 transparency bonus
- Subtotal
- 47.4
- Final score
- 47/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for puppies and growth. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
Scored against FEDIAF growth minima; puppy scoring is under review.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 26 | 28.7 | 100 |
| Fat | 14 | 15.5 | 100 |
| Calcium | 1.5 | 1.7 | 96.4 |
| Phosphorus | 1 | 1.1 | 100 |
| Calcium:phosphorus ratio | 1.5 | 1.5 | 100 |
Scored over 5 declared nutrients (combined weight 70); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score. Moisture was not declared and was estimated at 9.5% from the food type.
Declared fortification: 9 nutritional additives on the label
- Vitamin A 18 000 I.E./kg
- Vitamin D3 1000 I.E./kg
- Vitamin E 140 mg/kg
- Eisen (Eisen(II)-sulfat-Monohydrat) 100 mg/kg
- Zink (Zinkoxid) 80 mg/kg
- Mangan (Mangan(II)-oxid) 12 mg/kg
- Kupfer (Kupfer(II)-sulfat-Pentahydrat) 10 mg/kg
- Jod (Kalziumjodat, wasserfrei) 1 mg/kg
- Selen (Natriumselenit) 0,15 mg/kg
Low confidence: partial analysis or moisture estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (36.3% of the recipe mass) (voluntary) | 7.3/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) - not on file | 0/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared, Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
See all current recalls we track.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
Claims on file; none we can check against the label
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Geflügel aus artgerechter Bio-Tierhaltung (on pack) | provenance | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Der hohe Eiweiß- und Mineralstoffgehalt unterstützt den Aufbau der Knochen, Muskeln und Organe (on pack) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Mit Sorgfalt hergestellt in Deutschland (on pack) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Rohstoffe aus kontrolliert ökologischer Landwirtschaft (on pack) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Premium-Alleinfuttermittel in Bio-Qualität (on pack) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Glutenfreie Rezeptur (on pack) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Natürlich haltbar mit Extrakten aus pflanzlichen Ölen und Rosmarin (on pack) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Alternatives to Junior Bio-Geflügel
Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.