Bubeck Rind

Fresh Shelf · completeHigh meatClear label

Rind
Good
our rating

Our verdict

Is Bubeck Rind a good dog food?

We score it 73/100 (Good). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.

How we score

25% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.

Why you might choose it

  • Meat makes up an estimated 51% of the dry matter (60% as fed).
  • Prints ingredient percentages on the label.
  • Single named animal protein: beef.

Why you might not

  • Around 15% of the recipe is generic or unspecified ingredients.
  • High in fat: 32% fat on a dry-matter basis.

Who is this food for?

Suits

  • Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
  • Grain-free: no grain ingredients listed
  • Single named protein: beef
  • Doesn't list chicken, turkey, lamb, fish, venison, pork, duck as ingredients

Consider something else if:

  • You are limiting fat: 31.5% on a dry-matter basis is in the high band

These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.

Nutrition and feedingProtein 11% · Fat 8.50%

Typical analysis (as fed)

NutrientAs fed
Protein11%
Fat8.50%
Fibre1%
Ash2%
Moisture73%
Calcium0.45%
Phosphorus0.35%

Additives & feeding info

Feeding and storage

Storage

Die geöffnete Packung im Kühlschrank kühlen und zeitnah verzehren. Nur zimmerwarm füttern.

Feeding guide

Pro 5 kg Körpergewicht ca. 150 bis 250g pro Tag für einen normal aktiven erwachsenen Hund. Genaue Fütterungsempfehlung auf der Packung.

Additives declared on the label

Nutritional additives

Vitamin D3 150 I.E./kg; Vitamin E 30 mg/kg; Cu (aus Kupfer(II)-Sulfat-Pentahydrat) 2 mg/kg; Selen (aus Natriumselenit) 0.1 mg/kg; Zink (aus Aminosäuren-Zinkchelat, Hydrat) 39 mg/kg; Jod (aus Calciumjodat, wasserfrei) 1 mg/kg

Ingredients (18)25% of the recipe is estimated

Estimated composition

  • meat 60.0%
  • veg 12.0%
  • unknown 10.1%
  • carb 5.0%
  • other 4.0%
  • fibre 3.4%
  • supplement 3.3%
  • additive 2.3%
  • oil 0.1%
#As declaredMatchedLabel readingDeclared %Est. %
127.5% RindfleischBeefmeat · medium27.527.5
227.5% RinderherzBeef Heartmeat · good27.527.5
35% RinderleberBeef Livermeat · good55.0
4RinderbrüheCooking brothother · medium-4.0
5Karotte (6%)Carrotsveg · good66.0
6Kartoffel (5%)Potatoescarb · medium55.0
7Pastinake (3%)Parsnipsveg · good33.0
8Rinderproteinpulverunmatched--3.8
9Eierschalenmehlunmatched--3.5
10Bierhefe (0.5%)Brewer's Yeastsupplement · good0.50.5
11KartoffelfaserPotato Fibrefibre · medium-3.3
12HeidelbeerenBlueberriesveg · good-3.0
13getrocknet (0.3%)unmatched-0.30.3
14KaliumchloridPotassium Chloridesupplement · medium-2.8
15Karottensaftunmatched--2.5
16Hanföl (0.1%)Hemp Oiloil · good0.10.1
17Flohsamenschalen (0.1%)Psylliumfibre · good0.10.1
18NatriumchloridSaltadditive · poor-2.3
  1. 1. 27.5% Rindfleisch27.5% declared27.5% estimated
    Beef · meat · medium
  2. 2. 27.5% Rinderherz27.5% declared27.5% estimated
    Beef Heart · meat · good
  3. 3. 5% Rinderleber5% declared5.0% estimated
    Beef Liver · meat · good
  4. 4. Rinderbrühe4.0% estimated
    Cooking broth · other · medium
  5. 5. Karotte (6%)6% declared6.0% estimated
    Carrots · veg · good
  6. 6. Kartoffel (5%)5% declared5.0% estimated
    Potatoes · carb · medium
  7. 7. Pastinake (3%)3% declared3.0% estimated
    Parsnips · veg · good
  8. 8. Rinderproteinpulver3.8% estimated
    unmatched
  9. 9. Eierschalenmehl3.5% estimated
    unmatched
  10. 10. Bierhefe (0.5%)0.5% declared0.5% estimated
    Brewer's Yeast · supplement · good
  11. 11. Kartoffelfaser3.3% estimated
    Potato Fibre · fibre · medium
  12. 12. Heidelbeeren3.0% estimated
    Blueberries · veg · good
  13. 13. getrocknet (0.3%)0.3% declared0.3% estimated
    unmatched
  14. 14. Kaliumchlorid2.8% estimated
    Potassium Chloride · supplement · medium
  15. 15. Karottensaft2.5% estimated
    unmatched
  16. 16. Hanföl (0.1%)0.1% declared0.1% estimated
    Hemp Oil · oil · good
  17. 17. Flohsamenschalen (0.1%)0.1% declared0.1% estimated
    Psyllium · fibre · good
  18. 18. Natriumchlorid2.3% estimated
    Salt · additive · poor

Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-19

Brand and contact: Bubeck

Trust and provenance

Recall history
No recalls recorded in our database
Label data last checked
2026-09-19
Scored with
Model v3 (methodology)

Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.

External platform ratings are not scores for this individual recipe.

Trustpilot: 3.4/5 · 10 reviews

Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.

Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence

Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated

Why this score?

The overall score is 73 out of 100. The meat content contributed +4.9 points, while the overall quality of the ingredient list added a further +4.7 points. On the other hand, ingredients without printed percentages cost the product -2.6 points. Finally, being labelled nutritionally complete lifted the score by +2.3 points.

Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.

ComponentInputCoefficientContribution
Base score-30.909+30.91
Average ingredient quality0.59.191+4.65
Meat share of dry matter50.6%0.096+4.86
Carb share of dry matter3.8%-0.115-0.43
Oil share of dry matter0.3%-0.092-0.03
Vegetable share of dry matter5.4%-0.005-0.03
Additive share of dry matter6.1%0.163+0.99
Supplement share of dry matter9.0%-0.012-0.11
Other share of dry matter0.6%-0.375-0.23
Unrecognised share of dry matter15.1%-0.027-0.40
Recipe graded poor2.3%-0.065-0.15
Number of poor ingredients1-0.876-0.88
Largest single poor ingredient2.3%0.060+0.14
Undeclared quantities25.0%-0.106-2.64
Complete dietyes2.294+2.29
High meat (30%+ of dry matter)yes0.707+0.71
Additive penalty-2.750.222-0.61
Processing multiplier1.0033.786+33.79
Processing: Fresh Shelfyes-0.672-0.67
Show all 40 components
ComponentInputCoefficientContribution
Base score-30.909+30.91
Average ingredient quality0.59.191+4.65
Meat share of dry matter50.6%0.096+4.86
Carb share of dry matter3.8%-0.115-0.43
Oil share of dry matter0.3%-0.092-0.03
Vegetable share of dry matter5.4%-0.005-0.03
Additive share of dry matter6.1%0.163+0.99
Supplement share of dry matter9.0%-0.012-0.11
Other share of dry matter0.6%-0.375-0.23
Unrecognised share of dry matter15.1%-0.027-0.40
Recipe graded poor2.3%-0.065-0.15
Poor-quality meat in recipe0.0%-0.179+0.00
Number of poor ingredients1-0.876-0.88
Largest single poor ingredient2.3%0.060+0.14
Undeclared quantities25.0%-0.106-2.64
Prints ingredient percentagesno0.000+0.00
Complete dietyes2.294+2.29
Frozen or chilled freshno0.000+0.00
High meat (30%+ of dry matter)yes0.707+0.71
Low meat (under 10% of dry matter)no-3.158+0.00
High carb and low meatno-1.180+0.00
Meat share × printed percentages0.00.000+0.00
Meat share × fresh0.00.000+0.00
Fresh × high meat0.011.084+0.00
Additive penalty-2.750.222-0.61
Processing multiplier1.0033.786+33.79
Processing: Rawno-0.054+0.00
Processing: Fresh Chilledno-2.354+0.00
Processing: Fresh Frozenno-2.354+0.00
Processing: Fresh Refrigeratedno0.000+0.00
Processing: Fresh Shelfyes-0.672-0.67
Processing: Dry Freeze Driedno6.629+0.00
Processing: Dry Air Driedno6.331+0.00
Processing: Dry Cold Pressedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Bakedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Extrudedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Semi Moistno-6.174+0.00
Processing: Dry Mueslino-10.146+0.00
Processing: Wet Pateno-0.672+0.00
Processing: Wet Chunksno-0.672+0.00
Processing-type offset
-0.08
Additives declared on label
+1 transparency bonus
Subtotal
73.1
Final score
73/100

Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.

Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges

How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.

NutrientAs fed (label)Dry matter (scored)Score
Protein1140.7 (band 18 to 40%)100
Fat8.531.5 (band 5.5 to 20%)100
Fibre13.7 (band 0.5 to 5%)100
Calcium0.451.7 (band 0.5 to 2.5%)100
Phosphorus0.351.3 (band 0.4 to 1.6%)100
Calcium:phosphorus ratio1.31.3 (band 1 to 2%)87.1

Scored over 6 declared nutrients (combined weight 80); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score.

Declared fortification: 6 nutritional additives on the label
  • Vitamin D3 150 I.E./kg
  • Vitamin E 30 mg/kg
  • Cu (aus Kupfer(II)-Sulfat-Pentahydrat) 2 mg/kg
  • Selen (aus Natriumselenit) 0.1 mg/kg
  • Zink (aus Aminosäuren-Zinkchelat, Hydrat) 39 mg/kg
  • Jod (aus Calciumjodat, wasserfrei) 1 mg/kg

Medium confidence: the full five-part analysis is on file; where moisture was not declared it was estimated from the food type.

This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.

Transparency: what the label discloses

How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.

ItemPoints
✓ Ingredient list on the label (mandatory)10/10
✓ Printed percentages on the label (75% of the recipe mass) (voluntary)15/20
✓ Analytical constituents declared (mandatory)15/15
✓ Additives declared (mandatory)5/10
✗ Energy value declared (voluntary) - not on file0/5
✓ Complete/complementary designation (mandatory)5/5
✓ Feeding guidance given (mandatory)10/10
✓ Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory)5/10
✓ Country of manufacture stated (voluntary)10/10
✗ Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file0/5

Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Batch and date labelling).

Safety: recall history

Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.

No recalls recorded in our database.

See all current recalls we track.

Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it

The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.

100/100 · moderate — 1 checkable claim: 1 consistent, 0 contradicted.

Consistent with the label

  • "Mono-Protein-Rezeptur mit 100 % Rind im Fleischanteil" — supported by the declared single protein data.

7 further claims on file that we cannot check against the label.

Moderate: every checkable claim is consistent with the declared label.

ClaimTypeCheckSubstantiation
90% weniger Müll als bei herkömmlichen Dosen (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
eignet sich hervorragend für Hunde mit Unverträglichkeiten gegenüber anderen Proteinquellen (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
getreidefreies Alleinfuttermittel (on pack)Contentnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Alleinfuttermittel für erwachsene Hunde (on pack)Contentnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Mono-Protein-Rezeptur mit 100 % Rind im Fleischanteil (on pack)ContentconsistentManufacturer assertion
schonende Gently-Cooked-Verfahren / dampfgegart (on pack)Contentnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Vollständig recycelbar (on page)Contentnot checkableManufacturer assertion
frei von unnötigen Zusätzen (on pack)Free-fromnot checkableManufacturer assertion

The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.

Alternatives to Rind

Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.

See all alternatives

See all products from Bubeck

Community0 comments

Owners' verdict
0 votes

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.

Comments are reviewed before they appear.