Bubeck Nassfutter Lamm

Wet Pate · completeHigh meatClear label

71out of 100

Good

our rating

Our verdict

Is Bubeck Nassfutter Lamm a good dog food?

We score it 71/100 (Good). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.

How we score

Why you might choose it

Meat makes up an estimated 47% of the dry matter (65% as fed).
Prints ingredient percentages on the label.
Single named animal protein: lamb.

Why you might not

High in fat: 24% fat on a dry-matter basis.

Who is this food for?

Suits

Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
Single named protein: lamb
Doesn't list chicken, beef, turkey, fish, venison, pork, duck as ingredients

Consider something else if:

Your dog avoids grain: the label lists rice - white
You are limiting fat: 24.1% on a dry-matter basis is in the high band

These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.

Nutrition and feedingProtein 9.20% · Fat 6.50%

Typical analysis (as fed)

Nutrient	As fed
Protein	9.20%
Fat	6.50%
Fibre	0.90%
Ash	2.20%
Moisture	73%
Calcium	0.45%
Phosphorus	0.33%

Additives & feeding info

Feeding and storage

Storage

Die geöffnete Packung im Kühlschrank kühlen und zeitnah verzehren. Nur zimmerwarm füttern.

Feeding guide

Pro 5 kg Körpergewicht ca. 150–250 g pro Tag für einen normal aktiven erwachsenen Hund; genaue Empfehlung auf der Packung. Richtwerte, abhängig von Haltung, Rasse, Aktivität und Alter. Stets frisches Wasser bereitstellen.

Additives declared on the label

Nutritional additives

Vitamin D3 150 I.E./kg; Vitamin E 30 mg/kg; Kupfer (aus Kupfer(II)-Sulfat-Pentahydrat) 2 mg/kg; Selen (aus Natriumselenit) 0.1 mg/kg; Zink (aus Aminosäuren-Zinkchelat, Hydrat) 39 mg/kg; Jod (aus Calciumjodat, wasserfrei) 1 mg/kg

Ingredients (18)22% of the recipe is estimated

Estimated composition

meat 64.6%
carb 11.2%
veg 10.0%
supplement 4.0%
fibre 3.9%
unknown 3.3%
additive 2.7%
oil 0.3%

#	As declared	Matched	Label reading	Declared %	Est. %
1	27.5% Lamb Meat	Lamb	meat · medium	27.5	27.5
2	27.5% Lamb Stomach	Stomach	meat · medium	27.5	27.5
3	5% Lamb Liver	Lambs Liver	meat · good	5	5.0
4	Lamb Broth	Lamb Broth	meat · good	-	4.6
5	Carrot (7%)	Carrots	veg · good	7	7.0
6	Rice (5%)	Rice - white	carb · medium	5	5.0
7	Parsnip (2%)	Parsnips	veg · good	2	2.0
8	Millet (2%)	Millet	carb · good	2	2.0
9	Apple (1%)	Apples	veg · good	1	1.0
10	Tapioca	Tapioca	carb · medium	-	4.2
11	Potato Fibre	Potato Fibre	fibre · medium	-	3.8
12	Brewer's Yeast (0.5%)	Brewer's Yeast	supplement · good	0.5	0.5
13	Hemp Oil (0.3%)	Hemp Oil	oil · good	0.3	0.3
14	Dried Rose Hips (0.2%)	Rose Hip	veg · good	0.2	0.2
15	Potassium Chloride	Potassium Chloride	supplement · medium	-	3.5
16	Psyllium Husks (0.1%)	Psyllium	fibre · good	0.1	0.1
17	Carrot Juice	Carrot Juice	veg · good	-	3.1
18	Sodium Chloride.	Salt	additive · poor	-	2.7

1. 27.5% Lamb Meat27.5% declared27.5% estimated
Lamb · meat · medium
2. 27.5% Lamb Stomach27.5% declared27.5% estimated
Stomach · meat · medium
3. 5% Lamb Liver5% declared5.0% estimated
Lambs Liver · meat · good
4. Lamb Broth4.6% estimated
Lamb Broth · meat · good
5. Carrot (7%)7% declared7.0% estimated
Carrots · veg · good
6. Rice (5%)5% declared5.0% estimated
Rice - white · carb · medium
7. Parsnip (2%)2% declared2.0% estimated
Parsnips · veg · good
8. Millet (2%)2% declared2.0% estimated
Millet · carb · good
9. Apple (1%)1% declared1.0% estimated
Apples · veg · good
10. Tapioca4.2% estimated
Tapioca · carb · medium
11. Potato Fibre3.8% estimated
Potato Fibre · fibre · medium
12. Brewer's Yeast (0.5%)0.5% declared0.5% estimated
Brewer's Yeast · supplement · good
13. Hemp Oil (0.3%)0.3% declared0.3% estimated
Hemp Oil · oil · good
14. Dried Rose Hips (0.2%)0.2% declared0.2% estimated
Rose Hip · veg · good
15. Potassium Chloride3.5% estimated
Potassium Chloride · supplement · medium
16. Psyllium Husks (0.1%)0.1% declared0.1% estimated
Psyllium · fibre · good
17. Carrot Juice3.1% estimated
Carrot Juice · veg · good
18. Sodium Chloride.2.7% estimated
Salt · additive · poor

Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-19

Brand and contact: Bubeck

Website: https://www.bubeck-petfood.de/

Trust and provenance

Recall history: No recalls recorded in our database
Label data last checked: 2026-09-19
Scored with: Model v3 (methodology)
Product page: www.bubeck-petfood.de

Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.

Brand and retailer reviews

External platform ratings are not scores for this individual recipe.

Trustpilot: 3.4/5 · 10 reviews

Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.

Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence

Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated

Why this score?

The overall score is 71 out of 100. The overall quality of the ingredient list contributed +4.2 points, and the meat content contributed +4.2 points. Ingredients without printed percentages reduced the score by -2.3, while being labelled nutritionally complete added +2.3 points.

Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.

Component	Input	Coefficient	Contribution
Base score	-	30.909	+30.91
Average ingredient quality	0.5	9.191	+4.19
Meat share of dry matter	43.8%	0.096	+4.21
Carb share of dry matter	18.8%	-0.115	-2.17
Oil share of dry matter	0.8%	-0.092	-0.07
Vegetable share of dry matter	3.9%	-0.005	-0.02
Additive share of dry matter	6.3%	0.163	+1.03
Supplement share of dry matter	9.5%	-0.012	-0.12
Unrecognised share of dry matter	4.3%	-0.027	-0.11
Recipe graded poor	2.7%	-0.065	-0.17
Number of poor ingredients	1	-0.876	-0.88
Largest single poor ingredient	2.7%	0.060	+0.16
Undeclared quantities	21.9%	-0.106	-2.31
Complete diet	yes	2.294	+2.29
High meat (30%+ of dry matter)	yes	0.707	+0.71
Additive penalty	-3.28	0.222	-0.73
Processing multiplier	1.00	33.786	+33.79
Processing: Wet Pate	yes	-0.672	-0.67

Show all 40 components

Component	Input	Coefficient	Contribution
Base score	-	30.909	+30.91
Average ingredient quality	0.5	9.191	+4.19
Meat share of dry matter	43.8%	0.096	+4.21
Carb share of dry matter	18.8%	-0.115	-2.17
Oil share of dry matter	0.8%	-0.092	-0.07
Vegetable share of dry matter	3.9%	-0.005	-0.02
Additive share of dry matter	6.3%	0.163	+1.03
Supplement share of dry matter	9.5%	-0.012	-0.12
Other share of dry matter	0.0%	-0.375	+0.00
Unrecognised share of dry matter	4.3%	-0.027	-0.11
Recipe graded poor	2.7%	-0.065	-0.17
Poor-quality meat in recipe	0.0%	-0.179	+0.00
Number of poor ingredients	1	-0.876	-0.88
Largest single poor ingredient	2.7%	0.060	+0.16
Undeclared quantities	21.9%	-0.106	-2.31
Prints ingredient percentages	no	0.000	+0.00
Complete diet	yes	2.294	+2.29
Frozen or chilled fresh	no	0.000	+0.00
High meat (30%+ of dry matter)	yes	0.707	+0.71
Low meat (under 10% of dry matter)	no	-3.158	+0.00
High carb and low meat	no	-1.180	+0.00
Meat share × printed percentages	0.0	0.000	+0.00
Meat share × fresh	0.0	0.000	+0.00
Fresh × high meat	0.0	11.084	+0.00
Additive penalty	-3.28	0.222	-0.73
Processing multiplier	1.00	33.786	+33.79
Processing: Raw	no	-0.054	+0.00
Processing: Fresh Chilled	no	-2.354	+0.00
Processing: Fresh Frozen	no	-2.354	+0.00
Processing: Fresh Refrigerated	no	0.000	+0.00
Processing: Fresh Shelf	no	-0.672	+0.00
Processing: Dry Freeze Dried	no	6.629	+0.00
Processing: Dry Air Dried	no	6.331	+0.00
Processing: Dry Cold Pressed	no	-6.713	+0.00
Processing: Dry Baked	no	-6.713	+0.00
Processing: Dry Extruded	no	-6.713	+0.00
Processing: Dry Semi Moist	no	-6.174	+0.00
Processing: Dry Muesli	no	-10.146	+0.00
Processing: Wet Pate	yes	-0.672	-0.67
Processing: Wet Chunks	no	-0.672	+0.00

Processing-type offset: -0.08
Additives declared on label: +1 transparency bonus
Subtotal: 70.9
Final score: 71/100

Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.

Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges

How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.

Nutrient	As fed (label)	Dry matter (scored)	Score
Protein	9.2	34.1 (band 18 to 40%)	100
Fat	6.5	24.1 (band 5.5 to 20%)	100
Fibre	0.9	3.3 (band 0.5 to 5%)	100
Calcium	0.45	1.7 (band 0.5 to 2.5%)	100
Phosphorus	0.33	1.2 (band 0.4 to 1.6%)	100
Calcium:phosphorus ratio	1.4	1.4 (band 1 to 2%)	91.8

Scored over 6 declared nutrients (combined weight 80); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score.

Declared fortification: 6 nutritional additives on the label

Vitamin D3 150 I.E./kg
Vitamin E 30 mg/kg
Kupfer (aus Kupfer(II)-Sulfat-Pentahydrat) 2 mg/kg
Selen (aus Natriumselenit) 0.1 mg/kg
Zink (aus Aminosäuren-Zinkchelat, Hydrat) 39 mg/kg
Jod (aus Calciumjodat, wasserfrei) 1 mg/kg

Medium confidence: the full five-part analysis is on file; where moisture was not declared it was estimated from the food type.

This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.

Transparency: what the label discloses

How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.

Item	Points
✓ Ingredient list on the label (mandatory)	10/10
✓ Printed percentages on the label (78.1% of the recipe mass) (voluntary)	15.6/20
✓ Analytical constituents declared (mandatory)	15/15
✓ Additives declared (mandatory)	5/10
✗ Energy value declared (voluntary) - not on file	0/5
✓ Complete/complementary designation (mandatory)	5/5
✓ Feeding guidance given (mandatory)	10/10
✓ Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory)	5/10
✓ Country of manufacture stated (voluntary)	10/10
✗ Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file	0/5

Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Batch and date labelling).

Safety: recall history

Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.

No recalls recorded in our database.

See all current recalls we track.

Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it

The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.

100/100 · moderate — 1 checkable claim: 1 consistent, 0 contradicted.

Consistent with the label

"Single-Protein-Menü" — supported by the declared single protein data.

5 further claims on file that we cannot check against the label.

Moderate: every checkable claim is consistent with the declared label.

Claim	Type	Check	Substantiation
90% weniger Müll als bei herkömmlichen Dosen (on page)	Functional	not checkable	Manufacturer assertion
ideal für kleinere Hunde, Senioren oder Vierbeiner mit sensibler Verdauung (on page)	Functional	not checkable	Manufacturer assertion
glutenfreies Alleinfuttermittel (on page)	Content	not checkable	Manufacturer assertion
Single-Protein-Menü (on page)	Content	consistent	Manufacturer assertion
Vollständig recycelbar (on page)	Content	not checkable	Manufacturer assertion
schonend dampfgegart im eigenen Sud („Gently-Cooked") (on page)	Content	not checkable	Manufacturer assertion