Bubeck Mono-Delikatesse mit Ente

Dry Baked · complete

Mono-Delikatesse mit Ente
Average
our rating

Our verdict

Is Bubeck Mono-Delikatesse mit Ente a good dog food?

We score it 47/100 (Average). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.

How we score

Only part of the analytical constituents are declared, so the nutritional picture is incomplete.

100% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.

Why you might choose it

  • Single named animal protein: duck.
  • Low in fat for its format: 9% fat on a dry-matter basis.
  • Declares energy content, which most labels omit.

Why you might not

  • Around 30% of the recipe is generic or unspecified ingredients.
  • 100% of the recipe mass has no printed percentage, so the exact split cannot be verified.

Who is this food for?

Suits

  • Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
  • Single named protein: duck
  • Doesn't list chicken, beef, turkey, lamb, fish, venison, pork as ingredients

Consider something else if:

  • Your dog avoids grain: the label lists spelt flour

These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.

Nutrition and feedingProtein 21% · Fat 9%

Typical analysis (as fed)

NutrientAs fed
Protein21%
Fat9%
Fibre2.30%
Ash6.30%
Calcium1.50%
Phosphorus1.20%

Energy: 340 kcal/100g

Additives & feeding info

Feeding and storage

Storage

Kühl und trocken lagern.

Feeding guide

2-5 kg: 55-90 g/Tag; 6-10 kg: 125-180 g/Tag; 11-23 kg: 210-300 g/Tag; 24-40 kg: 345-500 g/Tag. Trocken füttern oder mit Wasser anfeuchten.

Additives declared on the label

Nutritional additives

Vitamin A 12.000 i. E./kg; Vitamin D3 1.200 i. E./kg; Vitamin E 70 mg/kg; Vitamin B1 10 mg/kg; Vitamin B2 10 mg/kg; Vitamin B6 6 mg/kg; Vitamin B12 30 mcg/kg; Niacin 40 mg/kg; Vitamin C 140 mg/kg; Calcium-D-Pantothenat 8 mg/kg; Biotin 250 mcg/kg; Folsäure 2 mg/kg; Eisen als Eisen-(II)-sulfat 175 mg/kg; Kupfer als Kupfer-(II)-Sulfat 10 mg/kg; Mangan als Mangan-(II)-oxid 20 mg/kg; Zink 125 mg/kg; Jod als Calciumjodat, wasserfrei 2 mg/kg; Selen 0,3 mg/kg

Ingredients (18)100% of the recipe is estimated

Estimated composition

  • veg 29.2%
  • unknown 28.5%
  • carb 19.0%
  • meat 13.6%
  • oil 5.7%
  • supplement 4.1%
#As declaredMatchedLabel readingDeclared %Est. %
1DuckDuckmeat · medium-3.6
2fresh portion before drying 53%unmatched-5353.0
3Spelt Flour T812Spelt Flourcarb · medium-3.5
4Spelt Flour T1600Spelt Flourcarb · medium-3.4
5Spelt MealSpeltcarb · medium-3.3
6Spelt BranSpeltcarb · medium-3.2
7AmaranthAmaranthcarb · good-3.1
8Potato FlakesPotatoescarb · medium-3.0
9MilletMilletcarb · good-2.9
10Whole Egg PowderDried Whole Eggmeat · good-2.8
11Rapeseed OilRapeseed oiloil · good-2.7
12AppleApplesveg · good-2.6
13ParsleyParsleyveg · good-2.4
14CarrotsCarrotsveg · good-2.3
15ParsnipsParsnipsveg · good-2.2
16LovageLovageveg · good-2.1
17RosemaryRosemaryveg · good-2.0
18Minerals.Vitamins and mineralssupplement · medium-1.9
  1. 1. Duck3.6% estimated
    Duck · meat · medium
  2. 2. fresh portion before drying 53%53% declared53.0% estimated
    unmatched
  3. 3. Spelt Flour T8123.5% estimated
    Spelt Flour · carb · medium
  4. 4. Spelt Flour T16003.4% estimated
    Spelt Flour · carb · medium
  5. 5. Spelt Meal3.3% estimated
    Spelt · carb · medium
  6. 6. Spelt Bran3.2% estimated
    Spelt · carb · medium
  7. 7. Amaranth3.1% estimated
    Amaranth · carb · good
  8. 8. Potato Flakes3.0% estimated
    Potatoes · carb · medium
  9. 9. Millet2.9% estimated
    Millet · carb · good
  10. 10. Whole Egg Powder2.8% estimated
    Dried Whole Egg · meat · good
  11. 11. Rapeseed Oil2.7% estimated
    Rapeseed oil · oil · good
  12. 12. Apple2.6% estimated
    Apples · veg · good
  13. 13. Parsley2.4% estimated
    Parsley · veg · good
  14. 14. Carrots2.3% estimated
    Carrots · veg · good
  15. 15. Parsnips2.2% estimated
    Parsnips · veg · good
  16. 16. Lovage2.1% estimated
    Lovage · veg · good
  17. 17. Rosemary2.0% estimated
    Rosemary · veg · good
  18. 18. Minerals.1.9% estimated
    Vitamins and minerals · supplement · medium

Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-19

Brand and contact: Bubeck

Trust and provenance

Recall history
No recalls recorded in our database
Label data last checked
2026-09-19
Scored with
Model v3 (methodology)

Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.

External platform ratings are not scores for this individual recipe.

Trustpilot: 3.4/5 · 10 reviews

6 reviews on this product · 5.0/5

Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.

Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence

Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated

Why this score?

The recipe scored 47 out of 100. Undeclared ingredient shares, meaning ingredients without printed percentages, cost it -10.6 points, while the processing format took away a further -6.7 points. The overall quality of the ingredient list added +5.5 points to the total. The carbohydrate content then reduced the score by -3 points.

Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.

ComponentInputCoefficientContribution
Base score-30.909+30.91
Average ingredient quality0.69.191+5.53
Carb share of dry matter26.4%-0.115-3.04
Oil share of dry matter11.6%-0.092-1.07
Vegetable share of dry matter9.1%-0.005-0.05
Supplement share of dry matter7.8%-0.012-0.09
Unrecognised share of dry matter29.5%-0.027-0.78
Undeclared quantities100.0%-0.106-10.56
Complete dietyes2.294+2.29
Low meat (under 10% of dry matter)yes-3.158-3.16
Processing multiplier0.9833.786+33.11
Processing: Dry Bakedyes-6.713-6.71
Show all 40 components
ComponentInputCoefficientContribution
Base score-30.909+30.91
Average ingredient quality0.69.191+5.53
Meat share of dry matter0.0%0.096+0.00
Carb share of dry matter26.4%-0.115-3.04
Oil share of dry matter11.6%-0.092-1.07
Vegetable share of dry matter9.1%-0.005-0.05
Additive share of dry matter0.0%0.163+0.00
Supplement share of dry matter7.8%-0.012-0.09
Other share of dry matter0.0%-0.375+0.00
Unrecognised share of dry matter29.5%-0.027-0.78
Recipe graded poor0.0%-0.065+0.00
Poor-quality meat in recipe0.0%-0.179+0.00
Number of poor ingredients0-0.876+0.00
Largest single poor ingredient0.0%0.060+0.00
Undeclared quantities100.0%-0.106-10.56
Prints ingredient percentagesno0.000+0.00
Complete dietyes2.294+2.29
Frozen or chilled freshno0.000+0.00
High meat (30%+ of dry matter)no0.707+0.00
Low meat (under 10% of dry matter)yes-3.158-3.16
High carb and low meatno-1.180+0.00
Meat share × printed percentages0.00.000+0.00
Meat share × fresh0.00.000+0.00
Fresh × high meat0.011.084+0.00
Additive penalty0.000.222+0.00
Processing multiplier0.9833.786+33.11
Processing: Rawno-0.054+0.00
Processing: Fresh Chilledno-2.354+0.00
Processing: Fresh Frozenno-2.354+0.00
Processing: Fresh Refrigeratedno0.000+0.00
Processing: Fresh Shelfno-0.672+0.00
Processing: Dry Freeze Driedno6.629+0.00
Processing: Dry Air Driedno6.331+0.00
Processing: Dry Cold Pressedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Bakedyes-6.713-6.71
Processing: Dry Extrudedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Semi Moistno-6.174+0.00
Processing: Dry Mueslino-10.146+0.00
Processing: Wet Pateno-0.672+0.00
Processing: Wet Chunksno-0.672+0.00
Processing-type offset
+0.02
Additives declared on label
+1 transparency bonus
Subtotal
47.4
Final score
47/100

Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.

Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges

How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.

NutrientAs fed (label)Dry matter (scored)Score
Protein2123.9 (band 18 to 40%)86
Fat910.2 (band 5.5 to 20%)89.6
Fibre2.32.6 (band 0.5 to 5%)98.2
Calcium1.51.7 (band 0.5 to 2.5%)100
Phosphorus1.21.4 (band 0.4 to 1.6%)100
Calcium:phosphorus ratio1.31.3 (band 1 to 2%)85
Energy (kcal/100g)340386.4100

Scored over 7 declared nutrients (combined weight 90); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score. Moisture was not declared and was estimated at 12% from the food type.

Declared fortification: 18 nutritional additives on the label
  • Vitamin A 12.000 i. E./kg
  • Vitamin D3 1.200 i. E./kg
  • Vitamin E 70 mg/kg
  • Vitamin B1 10 mg/kg
  • Vitamin B2 10 mg/kg
  • Vitamin B6 6 mg/kg
  • Vitamin B12 30 mcg/kg
  • Niacin 40 mg/kg
  • Vitamin C 140 mg/kg
  • Calcium-D-Pantothenat 8 mg/kg
  • Biotin 250 mcg/kg
  • Folsäure 2 mg/kg
  • Eisen als Eisen-(II)-sulfat 175 mg/kg
  • Kupfer als Kupfer-(II)-Sulfat 10 mg/kg
  • Mangan als Mangan-(II)-oxid 20 mg/kg
  • Zink 125 mg/kg
  • Jod als Calciumjodat, wasserfrei 2 mg/kg
  • Selen 0,3 mg/kg

Medium confidence: the full five-part analysis is on file; where moisture was not declared it was estimated from the food type.

This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.

Transparency: what the label discloses

How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.

ItemPoints
✓ Ingredient list on the label (mandatory)10/10
✗ Printed percentages on the label (voluntary) - not on file0/20
✗ Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file0/15
✓ Additives declared (mandatory)5/10
✓ Energy value declared (voluntary)5/5
✓ Complete/complementary designation (mandatory)5/5
✓ Feeding guidance given (mandatory)10/10
✓ Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory)5/10
✓ Country of manufacture stated (voluntary)10/10
✗ Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file0/5

Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared, Batch and date labelling).

Safety: recall history

Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.

No recalls recorded in our database.

See all current recalls we track.

Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it

The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.

50/100 · limited — 2 checkable claims: 1 consistent, 1 contradicted.

Contradicted by the label

  • "weizenfrei" — the declared label says otherwise on grain-free.

Consistent with the label

  • "Single Protein" — supported by the declared single protein data.

5 further claims on file that we cannot check against the label.

Limited: at least one claim contradicts the declared label, or a recent upheld ASA ruling applies.

ClaimTypeCheckSubstantiation
Speziell für sensible und allergische Vierbeiner entwickelt (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Die gebackene Krokette regt den Speichelfluss an und unterstützt somit die Verdauung (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
fördert die Zahnhygiene (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Traditionell im Steinofen gebacken (on page)Contentnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Ohne Zucker, ohne künstliche Konservierungsstoffe (on page)Free-fromnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Single Protein (on page)ContentconsistentManufacturer assertion
weizenfrei (on page)Free-fromcontradictedManufacturer assertion

The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.

Alternatives to Mono-Delikatesse mit Ente

Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.

See all alternatives

See all products from Bubeck

Community0 comments

Owners' verdict
0 votes

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.

Comments are reviewed before they appear.