Bubeck Feuchtnahrung Lamm mit Reis & Hüttenkäse
Wet Pate · completeClear labelFull label
Our verdict
Is Bubeck Feuchtnahrung Lamm mit Reis & Hüttenkäse a good dog food?
We score it 60/100 (Average). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
- Single named protein: lamb
- Doesn't list chicken, beef, turkey, fish, venison, pork, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids grain: the label lists rice - white
- You are limiting fat: 31.2% on a dry-matter basis is in the high band
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Nutrition and feedingProtein 10.60% · Fat 7.80%
Typical analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed |
|---|---|
| Protein | 10.60% |
| Fat | 7.80% |
| Fibre | 0.30% |
| Ash | 3% |
| Moisture | 75% |
Additives & feeding info
Feeding and storage
Storage
Die geöffnete Dose kühlen und zeitnah verzehren. Nur zimmerwarm füttern.
Feeding guide
Pro 5 kg Körpergewicht ca. 150 bis 200 g pro Tag für einen normal aktiven erwachsenen Hund. Richtwerte; tatsächlicher Bedarf hängt von Haltungsbedingungen, Rasse, Aktivität und Alter ab. Frisches Wasser bereitstellen.
Additives declared on the label
Nutritional additives
Vitamin A 3000 I.E./kg; Vitamin D3 200 I.E./kg; Zink (als Zinksulfat, Monohydrat) 25 mg/kg; Mangan (als Mangan(II)-sulfat, Monohydrat) 1,4 mg/kg; Kupfer (als Kupfer(II)-sulfat-Pentahydrat) 1 mg/kg; Jod (als Kalziumjodat, wasserfrei) 0,75 mg/kg
Ingredients (14)4% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- unknown 65.9%
- other 25.6%
- carb 5.0%
- meat 2.0%
- supplement 0.7%
- veg 0.4%
- oil 0.3%
- fibre 0.1%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 65% consisting of Lamb Hearts | Heart | meat · good | 65 | 65.0 |
| 2 | Lamb Meat | Lamb | meat · medium | - | 0.5 |
| 3 | Lamb Livers | Liver | meat · good | - | 0.5 |
| 4 | Lamb Lungs | Lung | meat · medium | - | 0.5 |
| 5 | Lamb Tripe | Lamb Tripe | meat · medium | - | 0.5 |
| 6 | 25.6% Broth | Cooking broth | other · medium | 25.6 | 25.6 |
| 7 | 5% Rice | Rice - white | carb · medium | 5 | 5.0 |
| 8 | Apple | Apples | veg · good | - | 0.4 |
| 9 | Minerals | Vitamins and minerals | supplement · medium | - | 0.4 |
| 10 | 0.5% Cottage Cheese | Cottage Cheese | meat · good | 0.5 | 0.5 |
| 11 | Flaxseed Meal | Linseed Cake | fibre · medium | - | 0.4 |
| 12 | Sunflower Oil | Sunflower oil | oil · good | - | 0.3 |
| 13 | 0.1% Psyllium Husks | Psyllium | fibre · good | 0.1 | 0.1 |
| 14 | Brewer's Yeast. | Brewer's Yeast | supplement · good | - | 0.3 |
- 1. 65% consisting of Lamb Hearts65% declared65.0% estimated
- 2. Lamb Meat0.5% estimated
- 3. Lamb Livers0.5% estimated
- 4. Lamb Lungs0.5% estimated
- 5. Lamb Tripe0.5% estimated
- 6. 25.6% Broth25.6% declared25.6% estimated
- 7. 5% Rice5% declared5.0% estimated
- 8. Apple0.4% estimated
- 9. Minerals0.4% estimated
- 10. 0.5% Cottage Cheese0.5% declared0.5% estimated
- 11. Flaxseed Meal0.4% estimated
- 12. Sunflower Oil0.3% estimated
- 13. 0.1% Psyllium Husks0.1% declared0.1% estimated
- 14. Brewer's Yeast.0.3% estimated
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-19
Brand and contact: Bubeck
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-19
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- www.bubeck-petfood.de
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Brand and retailer reviews
External platform ratings are not scores for this individual recipe.
Trustpilot: 3.4/5 · 10 reviews
22 reviews on this product · 5.0/5
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
The overall score for this food is 60 out of 100. Being labelled nutritionally complete contributed +2.3 points, while ingredients we could not classify cost -2.2 points. The carbohydrate content reduced the score by -1.3, and the remaining ingredients had a further impact of -1.2.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.1 | 9.191 | +0.92 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 0.3% | 0.096 | +0.03 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 10.9% | -0.115 | -1.26 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 0.8% | -0.092 | -0.07 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 1.6% | -0.012 | -0.02 |
| Other share of dry matter | 3.2% | -0.375 | -1.19 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 81.7% | -0.027 | -2.17 |
| Undeclared quantities | 3.8% | -0.106 | -0.40 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 33.786 | +33.79 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | yes | -0.672 | -0.67 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.1 | 9.191 | +0.92 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 0.3% | 0.096 | +0.03 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 10.9% | -0.115 | -1.26 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 0.8% | -0.092 | -0.07 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 0.2% | -0.005 | -0.00 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.163 | +0.00 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 1.6% | -0.012 | -0.02 |
| Other share of dry matter | 3.2% | -0.375 | -1.19 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 81.7% | -0.027 | -2.17 |
| Recipe graded poor | 0.0% | -0.065 | +0.00 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 0 | -0.876 | +0.00 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 0.0% | 0.060 | +0.00 |
| Undeclared quantities | 3.8% | -0.106 | -0.40 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | no | 0.707 | +0.00 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | 0.00 | 0.222 | +0.00 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 33.786 | +33.79 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | yes | -0.672 | -0.67 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- -0.08
- Additives declared on label
- +1 transparency bonus
- Subtotal
- 59.9
- Final score
- 60/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 10.6 | 42.4 (band 18 to 40%) | 100 |
| Fat | 7.8 | 31.2 (band 5.5 to 20%) | 100 |
| Fibre | 0.3 | 1.2 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 79.3 |
Scored over 3 declared nutrients (combined weight 50); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score.
Declared fortification: 6 nutritional additives on the label
- Vitamin A 3000 I.E./kg
- Vitamin D3 200 I.E./kg
- Zink (als Zinksulfat, Monohydrat) 25 mg/kg
- Mangan (als Mangan(II)-sulfat, Monohydrat) 1,4 mg/kg
- Kupfer (als Kupfer(II)-sulfat-Pentahydrat) 1 mg/kg
- Jod (als Kalziumjodat, wasserfrei) 0,75 mg/kg
Medium confidence: the full five-part analysis is on file; where moisture was not declared it was estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (96.2% of the recipe mass) (voluntary) | 19.2/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) | 15/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) - not on file | 0/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) | 5/5 |
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
See all current recalls we track.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
50/100 · limited — 2 checkable claims: 1 consistent, 1 contradicted.
Contradicted by the label
- "getreidefreie Hundenahrung mit Reis & Hüttenkäse" — the declared label says otherwise on grain-free.
Consistent with the label
- "100 % Lamm als Single-Protein" — supported by the declared single protein data.
4 further claims on file that we cannot check against the label.
Limited: at least one claim contradicts the declared label, or a recent upheld ASA ruling applies.
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Verfeinert mit Sonnenblumenöl & Flohsamenschalen: Unterstützt eine gesunde Verdauung und trägt zu einem glänzenden Fell und gesunder Haut bei (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| 100 % Lamm als Single-Protein (on page) | Content | consistent | Manufacturer assertion |
| Glutenfrei & ohne Zucker: Komplett frei von glutenhaltigem Getreide, Zucker und künstlichen Konservierungsstoffen (on page) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| getreidefreie Hundenahrung mit Reis & Hüttenkäse (on page) | Free-from | contradicted | Manufacturer assertion |
| Mit Reis & Hüttenkäse (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| perfekt abgestimmte Vollnahrung für erwachsene Hunde (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Alternatives to Feuchtnahrung Lamm mit Reis & Hüttenkäse
Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.