Barking Heads Tummy Loving Care Fish Dry Dog Food - All Hounder
Dry Extruded · completeHigh meatClear label
Our verdict
Is Barking Heads Tummy Loving Care Fish Dry Dog Food - All Hounder a good dog food?
We score it 69/100 (Average). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
Complete extruded dry food for adult dogs, with white fish, fish meal and salmon oil as the main ingredients.
Only part of the analytical constituents are declared, so the nutritional picture is incomplete.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
- Grain-free: no grain ingredients listed
- Single named protein: fish
- Doesn't list chicken, beef, turkey, lamb, venison, pork, duck as ingredients
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Ingredients (17)17% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- meat 46.0%
- carb 28.0%
- veg 16.0%
- supplement 4.5%
- oil 4.0%
- fibre 1.5%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Freshly Prepared White Fish (29%) | White Fish | meat · good | 29 | 29.0 |
| 2 | Dried Fish (15%) | Fish Meal | meat · medium | 15 | 15.0 |
| 3 | Salmon Oil (4%) | Salmon Oil | oil · good | 4 | 4.0 |
| 4 | Salmon Gravy (2%) | Salmon | meat · good | 2 | 2.0 |
| 5 | Sweet Potato (26%) | Sweet Potatoes | carb · good | 26 | 26.0 |
| 6 | Potato | Potatoes | carb · medium | - | 2.0 |
| 7 | Peas (7%) | Peas | veg · good | 7 | 7.0 |
| 8 | Lucerne | Alfalfa | veg · good | - | 1.9 |
| 9 | Linseed | Linseed | veg · good | - | 1.8 |
| 10 | Minerals | Vitamins and minerals | supplement · medium | - | 1.7 |
| 11 | Yeast Products | Yeast | supplement · good | - | 1.6 |
| 12 | Chicory Root Extract | Chicory Root Extract | fibre · good | - | 1.5 |
| 13 | Seaweed | Seaweed | veg · good | - | 1.5 |
| 14 | Dried Carrot | Carrots | veg · good | - | 1.4 |
| 15 | Peppermint | Peppermint | veg · good | - | 1.3 |
| 16 | Rosemary | Rosemary | veg · good | - | 1.2 |
| 17 | Beta Glucans | Beta-Glucans | supplement · good | - | 1.1 |
- 1. Freshly Prepared White Fish (29%)29% declared29.0% estimated
- 2. Dried Fish (15%)15% declared15.0% estimated
- 3. Salmon Oil (4%)4% declared4.0% estimated
- 4. Salmon Gravy (2%)2% declared2.0% estimated
- 5. Sweet Potato (26%)26% declared26.0% estimated
- 6. Potato2.0% estimated
- 7. Peas (7%)7% declared7.0% estimated
- 8. Lucerne1.9% estimated
- 9. Linseed1.8% estimated
- 10. Minerals1.7% estimated
- 11. Yeast Products1.6% estimated
- 12. Chicory Root Extract1.5% estimated
- 13. Seaweed1.5% estimated
- 14. Dried Carrot1.4% estimated
- 15. Peppermint1.3% estimated
- 16. Rosemary1.2% estimated
- 17. Beta Glucans1.1% estimated
Nutrition and feedingProtein 23% · Fat 11%
Typical analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed |
|---|---|
| Protein | 23% |
| Fat | 11% |
| Fibre | 3.50% |
| Ash | 8.50% |
Energy: 351 kcal/100g
Additives & feeding info
Additives declared on the label
Nutritional additives
Vitamin A 17,000 IU; Vitamin E 100mg; Biotin 0.15mg; Iron (Iron (II) Sulphate Monohydrate) 60mg; Zinc (Zinc Sulphate Monohydrate) 50mg; Manganese (Manganous Sulphate Monohydrate) 50mg; Zinc (Zinc Chelate of Glycine Hydrate) 15mg; Copper (Copper (II) Sulphate Pentahydrate) 5mg; Iodine (Calcium Iodate Anhydrous) 1.5mg
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-19
Brand and contact: Barking Heads
- Website
- https://barkingheads.co.uk/
- [email protected]
- Phone
- 01344 596325
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-19
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- www.barkingheads.co.uk
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Brand and retailer reviews
External platform ratings are not scores for this individual recipe.
245 reviews on this product · 4.9/5
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
The overall score is 69 out of 100. The overall quality of the ingredient list contributed +7.3 points, and the meat content added +4.8 points. Being labelled nutritionally complete added +2.3 points. However, the processing format reduced the score by -6.7 points.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.8 | 9.191 | +7.29 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 49.7% | 0.096 | +4.77 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 15.8% | -0.115 | -1.81 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 8.9% | -0.092 | -0.82 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 13.2% | -0.005 | -0.07 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 9.2% | -0.012 | -0.11 |
| Undeclared quantities | 17.0% | -0.106 | -1.79 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | yes | 0.707 | +0.71 |
| Processing multiplier | 0.98 | 33.786 | +33.11 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.8 | 9.191 | +7.29 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 49.7% | 0.096 | +4.77 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 15.8% | -0.115 | -1.81 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 8.9% | -0.092 | -0.82 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 13.2% | -0.005 | -0.07 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.163 | +0.00 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 9.2% | -0.012 | -0.11 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.375 | +0.00 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.027 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 0.0% | -0.065 | +0.00 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 0 | -0.876 | +0.00 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 0.0% | 0.060 | +0.00 |
| Undeclared quantities | 17.0% | -0.106 | -1.79 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | yes | 0.707 | +0.71 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | no | -3.158 | +0.00 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | 0.00 | 0.222 | +0.00 |
| Processing multiplier | 0.98 | 33.786 | +33.11 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- +0.02
- Additives declared on label
- +1 transparency bonus
- Subtotal
- 68.8
- Final score
- 69/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 23 | 25.4 (band 18 to 40%) | 90.2 |
| Fat | 11 | 12.2 (band 5.5 to 20%) | 97.5 |
| Fibre | 3.5 | 3.9 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 100 |
| Energy (kcal/100g) | 351 | 387.8 | 100 |
Scored over 4 declared nutrients (combined weight 60); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score. Moisture was not declared and was estimated at 9.5% from the food type.
Declared fortification: 9 nutritional additives on the label
- Vitamin A 17,000 IU
- Vitamin E 100mg
- Biotin 0.15mg
- Iron (Iron (II) Sulphate Monohydrate) 60mg
- Zinc (Zinc Sulphate Monohydrate) 50mg
- Manganese (Manganous Sulphate Monohydrate) 50mg
- Zinc (Zinc Chelate of Glycine Hydrate) 15mg
- Copper (Copper (II) Sulphate Pentahydrate) 5mg
- Iodine (Calcium Iodate Anhydrous) 1.5mg
Low confidence: partial analysis or moisture estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (83% of the recipe mass) (voluntary) | 16.6/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) | 5/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) - not on file | 0/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared, Feeding guidance given, Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
See all current recalls we track.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
Claims on file; none we can check against the label
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-biotics for healthy digestion and nutrient absorption (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Salmon oil rich in omega-3 to help soothe tummies and support overall wellbeing (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Vet-approved (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Gentle on sensitive stomachs (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Highly digestible (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| 7% Veggies (on pack) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| 50% White Fish (on pack) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| 26% Sweet Potato (on pack) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Grain-free recipe (on pack) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| No nasties or fillers (on page) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Free from artificial colours, flavours & preservatives (on pack) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Alternatives to Tummy Loving Care Fish Dry Dog Food - All Hounder
Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.