Arden Grange Neutered Adult With fresh chicken & sweet potato Dry Food
Raw complete High meat Clear label
Is Arden Grange Neutered Adult With fresh chicken & sweet potato Dry Food a good dog food?
We score it 67/100 (Average). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
Why this score?
The score is 67 out of 100. The overall quality of the ingredient list contributed +5.4 points, while ingredients without printed percentages changed it by -4.2 points. The carbohydrate content changed it by -3.6 points, and the meat content contributed +3.3 points.
Only part of the analytical constituents are declared, so the nutritional picture is incomplete.
40% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
- Recipe67
- Nutritionallow77
- Transparency47
- Safety100
- Evidencelimited0
The Recipe score measures how attractive and transparent the declared ingredient list is. It is not, by itself, proof that the food is nutritionally appropriate for long-term feeding. The Nutritional and Evidence scores measure what we can verify towards that stronger claim.
Complete raw food for adult dogs, with lamb, meat meal and rice as the main ingredients.
Why you might choose it
- Meat makes up an estimated 40% of the dry matter (44% as fed).
- Prints ingredient percentages on the label.
- Nutritionally complete: formulated to be fed as the whole diet.
Why you might not
- No analytical breakdown is published.
Estimated composition
Typical analysis (as fed)
- Protein
- 25.50%
- Fat
- 12%
- Fibre
- 6%
- Ash
- 6%
- Calcium
- 1.10%
- Phosphorus
- 0.70%
Additives & feeding info
No additives recorded yet.
Reviews
Trustpilot: 4.8/5 · 1,967 reviews
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
- Doesn't list beef, turkey, venison, pork, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids chicken: the label lists chicken oil and fat
- Your dog avoids lamb: the label lists lamb
- Your dog avoids fish: the label lists krill
- Your dog avoids grain: the label lists rice - white
- You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Use the homepage filter to find foods that fit your dog.
Ingredients (21)
| # | As declared | Matched | Category | Tier | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lamb | Lamb | meat | medium | - | 2.9 |
| 2 | 29% lamb meat meal | Meat Meal | meat | medium | 29 | 29.0 |
| 3 | 5% fresh lamb | Lamb | meat | medium | 5 | 5.0 |
| 4 | rice 26% | Rice - white | carb | medium | 26 | 26.0 |
| 5 | maize | Maize / Corn | carb | medium | - | 2.8 |
| 6 | refined chicken oil | Chicken Oil and Fat | oil | good | - | 2.7 |
| 7 | beet pulp | Beet Pulp | fibre | medium | - | 2.7 |
| 8 | whole dried egg | Dried Egg | meat | medium | - | 2.6 |
| 9 | chicken digest | Digest | meat | poor | - | 2.5 |
| 10 | yeast | Yeast | supplement | good | - | 2.4 |
| 11 | whole linseed | Linseed | veg | good | - | 2.3 |
| 12 | krill | Krill | meat | good | - | 2.3 |
| 13 | minerals | Vitamins and minerals | supplement | medium | - | 2.2 |
| 14 | prebiotic FOS | Prebiotics | supplement | good | - | 2.1 |
| 15 | prebiotic MOS | Mannanoligosaccharides | supplement | good | - | 2.0 |
| 16 | yucca extract | Yucca Schidigera | supplement | good | - | 1.9 |
| 17 | glucosamine | Glucosamine | supplement | good | - | 1.9 |
| 18 | MSM | MSM | supplement | good | - | 1.8 |
| 19 | chondroitin | Chondroitin | supplement | good | - | 1.7 |
| 20 | cranberries | Cranberries | veg | good | - | 1.6 |
| 21 | nucleotides | Nucleotides | supplement | medium | - | 1.5 |
Brand
- Website
- https://www.ardengrange.com/
- [email protected]
- Phone
- 01273894617
- Address
- Danworth House, Jobs Lane, Sayers Common, BN6 9HE
- Contact page
- www.ardengrange.com
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-09
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- www.ardengrange.com
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-06. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.6 | 9.191 | +5.42 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 34.4% | 0.096 | +3.30 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 31.1% | -0.115 | -3.58 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 3.3% | -0.092 | -0.31 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 2.9% | -0.005 | -0.01 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 19.8% | -0.012 | -0.24 |
| Recipe graded poor | 2.5% | -0.065 | -0.16 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 2.5% | -0.179 | -0.45 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 1 | -0.876 | -0.88 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 2.5% | 0.060 | +0.15 |
| Undeclared quantities | 40.0% | -0.106 | -4.22 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | yes | 0.707 | +0.71 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.12 | 33.786 | +37.84 |
| Processing: Raw | yes | -0.054 | -0.05 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.6 | 9.191 | +5.42 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 34.4% | 0.096 | +3.30 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 31.1% | -0.115 | -3.58 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 3.3% | -0.092 | -0.31 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 2.9% | -0.005 | -0.01 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.163 | +0.00 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 19.8% | -0.012 | -0.24 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.375 | +0.00 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.027 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 2.5% | -0.065 | -0.16 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 2.5% | -0.179 | -0.45 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 1 | -0.876 | -0.88 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 2.5% | 0.060 | +0.15 |
| Undeclared quantities | 40.0% | -0.106 | -4.22 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | no | 2.294 | +0.00 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | yes | 0.707 | +0.71 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | no | -3.158 | +0.00 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | 0.00 | 0.222 | +0.00 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.12 | 33.786 | +37.84 |
| Processing: Raw | yes | -0.054 | -0.05 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- -1.74
- Subtotal
- 66.7
- Final score
- 67/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Score history across model versions
The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 25.5 | 82.8 (band 18 to 40%) | 100 |
| Fat | 12 | 39 (band 5.5 to 20%) | 100 |
| Fibre | 6 | 19.5 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 0 |
| Calcium | 1.1 | 3.6 (band 0.5 to 2.5%) | 57.1 |
| Phosphorus | 0.7 | 2.3 (band 0.4 to 1.6%) | 58 |
| Calcium:phosphorus ratio | 1.6 | 1.6 (band 1 to 2%) | 100 |
Scored over 6 declared nutrients (combined weight 80); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score. Moisture was not declared and was estimated at 69.2% from the food type.
No nutritional additives section declared on the label.
Low confidence: partial analysis or moisture estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (60% of the recipe mass) (voluntary) | 12/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) - not on file | 0/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) - not on file | 0/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared, Additives declared, Feeding guidance given, Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
See all current recalls we track.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
0/100 · limited — 2 checkable claims: 0 consistent, 2 contradicted.
Contradicted by the label
- "Made without added grains, soy or dairy for a clean, carefully considered recipe" — the declared label says otherwise on grain-free.
- "Naturally low in fat and enriched with L-carnitine to help metabolise fat efficiently and support the maintenance of a healthy, balanced body condition" — the declared label says otherwise on low fat.
1 further claim on file that we cannot check against the label.
Limited: at least one claim contradicts the declared label, or a recent upheld ASA ruling applies.
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| With fresh chicken & sweet potato (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Made without added grains, soy or dairy for a clean, carefully considered recipe (on page) | Free-from | contradicted | Manufacturer assertion |
| Naturally low in fat and enriched with L-carnitine to help metabolise fat efficiently and support the maintenance of a healthy, balanced body condition (on page) | High/low level | contradicted | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Other products from Arden Grange
See all products from Arden Grange
Alternatives to Neutered Adult With fresh chicken & sweet potato Dry Food
Foods in our database that are similar on ingredients, protein, format or price. Scores and figures are from the same deterministic model used everywhere on the site.
Community
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.