Akela Pet Dog Training Treats 80% Chicken, Turkey & Duck

Treat complementary High meat Clear label

This is a treat, not a complete diet. The 1–100 rating applies to complete foods, so it isn't scored. Ingredient breakdown below.

Is Akela Pet Dog Training Treats 80% Chicken, Turkey & Duck a good dog food?

This is a treat, not a complete diet, so it is not scored on our 1-100 scale. The ingredient breakdown below shows what is in it; a treat should be fed alongside, not instead of, a complete diet.

How we score

Recipe
Not applicable
Nutritional
Not applicable
Transparency
60
Safety
100
Evidence
Not recorded

Complementary extruded dry treats for dogs of all life stages, with poultry, sweet potatoes and potatoes as the main ingredients.

Why you might choose it

Meat makes up an estimated 86% of the dry matter (85% as fed).
Prints ingredient percentages on the label.
Doesn't list grain ingredients.

Why you might not

A treat, not a complete diet: feed as an extra, not the whole diet.

View the source page

What the label tells us

The label lists 4 ingredients.
Uses generic terms (Poultry, Chicken Broth): the specific animal source is not stated.
Lists no artificial colours or preservatives.
Prints quantities for 1 ingredient.

Why is this treat not scored?

Our 1 to 100 rating applies to complete diets, so treats and complementary foods are presented as what the label tells us rather than a number that would invite comparison with complete meals.

What should I look for on a treat label?

A short ingredient list, named animal sources instead of generic terms, and no artificial colours or preservatives. Printed quantities are a good transparency signal, though few treat labels provide them.

These points are derived from the published ingredient list, not a rating.

Estimated composition

meat85.3%

carb14.7%

Typical analysis (as fed)

Protein: 28%
Fat: 15%
Fibre: 2%
Ash: 6.50%
Moisture: 8%
Carbohydrates: 40.50%

Energy: 389 kcal/100g

Additives & feeding info

No additives recorded yet.

Feeding guide

Ideal training treat for puppies, young dogs and training for agility, fly-ball, obedience and other canine sports.

Reviews

Trustpilot: 4.9/5 · 3,332 reviews

Who is this food for?

Suits

Labelled by the manufacturer for all lifestages
Grain-free: no grain ingredients listed
Doesn't list beef, lamb, fish, venison, pork as ingredients

Consider something else if:

Your dog avoids chicken: the label lists poultry
Your dog avoids turkey: the label lists poultry
Your dog avoids duck: it is listed as an ingredient
You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein

These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Use the homepage filter to find foods that fit your dog.

Ingredients (4)

#	As declared	Matched	Category	Tier	Declared %	Est. %
1	Poultry (80%)	Poultry	meat	medium	80	80.0
2	Sweet Potato	Sweet Potatoes	carb	good	-	8.0
3	Potato	Potatoes	carb	medium	-	6.7
4	Chicken Stock	Chicken Broth	meat	medium	-	5.3

Brand

Website: https://www.wholeprey.com/

Trust and provenance

Recall history: No recalls recorded in our database
Label data last checked: 2026-09-02
Product page: www.wholeprey.com

Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.

Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.

Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated

Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-06. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.

Component	Input	Coefficient	Contribution
Base score	-	30.909	+30.91
Average ingredient quality	0.5	9.191	+4.94
Meat share of dry matter	84.5%	0.096	+8.12
Carb share of dry matter	13.8%	-0.115	-1.59
Undeclared quantities	20.0%	-0.106	-2.11
High meat (30%+ of dry matter)	yes	0.707	+0.71
Processing multiplier	0.98	33.786	+33.11
Processing: Dry Extruded	yes	-6.713	-6.71

Show all 40 components

Component	Input	Coefficient	Contribution
Base score	-	30.909	+30.91
Average ingredient quality	0.5	9.191	+4.94
Meat share of dry matter	84.5%	0.096	+8.12
Carb share of dry matter	13.8%	-0.115	-1.59
Oil share of dry matter	0.0%	-0.092	+0.00
Vegetable share of dry matter	0.0%	-0.005	+0.00
Additive share of dry matter	0.0%	0.163	+0.00
Supplement share of dry matter	0.0%	-0.012	+0.00
Other share of dry matter	0.0%	-0.375	+0.00
Unrecognised share of dry matter	0.0%	-0.027	+0.00
Recipe graded poor	0.0%	-0.065	+0.00
Poor-quality meat in recipe	0.0%	-0.179	+0.00
Number of poor ingredients	0	-0.876	+0.00
Largest single poor ingredient	0.0%	0.060	+0.00
Undeclared quantities	20.0%	-0.106	-2.11
Prints ingredient percentages	no	0.000	+0.00
Complete diet	no	2.294	+0.00
Frozen or chilled fresh	no	0.000	+0.00
High meat (30%+ of dry matter)	yes	0.707	+0.71
Low meat (under 10% of dry matter)	no	-3.158	+0.00
High carb and low meat	no	-1.180	+0.00
Meat share × printed percentages	0.0	0.000	+0.00
Meat share × fresh	0.0	0.000	+0.00
Fresh × high meat	0.0	11.084	+0.00
Additive penalty	0.00	0.222	+0.00
Processing multiplier	0.98	33.786	+33.11
Processing: Raw	no	-0.054	+0.00
Processing: Fresh Chilled	no	-2.354	+0.00
Processing: Fresh Frozen	no	-2.354	+0.00
Processing: Fresh Refrigerated	no	0.000	+0.00
Processing: Fresh Shelf	no	-0.672	+0.00
Processing: Dry Freeze Dried	no	6.629	+0.00
Processing: Dry Air Dried	no	6.331	+0.00
Processing: Dry Cold Pressed	no	-6.713	+0.00
Processing: Dry Baked	no	-6.713	+0.00
Processing: Dry Extruded	yes	-6.713	-6.71
Processing: Dry Semi Moist	no	-6.174	+0.00
Processing: Dry Muesli	no	-10.146	+0.00
Processing: Wet Pate	no	-0.672	+0.00
Processing: Wet Chunks	no	-0.672	+0.00

Processing-type offset: +0.02
Subtotal: 67.4
Final score: 67/100

Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.

This is not a complete diet, so the 1-100 rating does not apply to it. Read the recipe breakdown above as ingredient-quality context only.

Score history across model versions

The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.

Model	Score
v3	67/100	current
v2	65/100
v1	64/100
v1.9	77/100

Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges

Not applicable to complementary food. FEDIAF reference ranges apply to complete diets.

Transparency: what the label discloses

How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.

Item	Points
✓ Ingredient list on the label (mandatory)	10/10
✓ Printed percentages on the label (80% of the recipe mass) (voluntary)	16/20
✓ Analytical constituents declared (mandatory)	15/15
✗ Additives declared (mandatory) - not on file	0/10
✓ Energy value declared (voluntary)	5/5
✓ Complete/complementary designation (mandatory)	5/5
✓ Feeding guidance given (mandatory)	10/10
✓ Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory)	5/10
✓ Country of manufacture stated (voluntary)	10/10
✗ Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file	0/5

Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Additives declared, Batch and date labelling).

Safety: recall history

Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.

No recalls recorded in our database.

See all current recalls we track.

Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it

The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.

Claims on file; none we can check against the label