About Us Ocean Fish & Chicken Pâté
Wet Pate · completeHigh meatClear label
Our verdict
Is About Us Ocean Fish & Chicken Pâté a good dog food?
We score it 67/100 (Average). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
Only part of the analytical constituents are declared, so the nutritional picture is incomplete.
38% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
- Grain-free: no grain ingredients listed
- Doesn't list beef, turkey, lamb, venison, pork, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids chicken: the label lists chicken
- Your dog avoids fish: the label lists ocean fish
- You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein
- You need more protein than this: 7.8% on a dry-matter basis is in the low band
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Nutrition and feedingProtein 7.80% · Fat 5.50%
Typical analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed |
|---|---|
| Protein | 7.80% |
| Fat | 5.50% |
| Carbohydrates | 4% |
| Omega-3 fatty acids | 0.50% |
| Omega-6 fatty acids | 0.60% |
| Calcium | 0.20% |
| Phosphorus | 0.20% |
Energy: 115 kcal/100g
Additives & feeding info
Feeding and storage
Storage
For optimal freshness, store in a cool dry place away from direct sunlight.
Feeding guide
Suitable for adult dogs. Gradually introduce over 7-10 days. Approximate daily feeding: 1-5kg = 1/2-2 pouches; 5-10kg = 2-3.5 pouches; 10-25kg = 3.5-7.5 pouches; 25kg+ = 7.5+ pouches (wet only).
No additives recorded yet.
Ingredients (31)38% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- meat 62.0%
- veg 16.6%
- supplement 8.4%
- additive 6.8%
- oil 3.1%
- carb 3.1%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ocean Fish (23%) | Ocean Fish | meat · medium | 23 | 23.0 |
| 2 | Chicken Meat (15%) | Chicken | meat · medium | 15 | 15.0 |
| 3 | Chicken Frames (12%) | Chicken | meat · medium | 12 | 12.0 |
| 4 | Chicken Liver (12%) | Chicken Liver | meat · good | 12 | 12.0 |
| 5 | Prebiotics (Chicory) | Prebiotics | supplement · good | - | 1.9 |
| 6 | Vitamins & Minerals | Vitamin | supplement · good | - | 1.8 |
| 7 | Cassia Gum | Cassia gum | additive · poor | - | 1.8 |
| 8 | Guar Gum | Guar gum | additive · medium | - | 1.8 |
| 9 | Carrageenan | Carrageenan | additive · poor | - | 1.7 |
| 10 | Glycine | Manganese Glycine Chelate | supplement · good | - | 1.7 |
| 11 | Dextrose | Dextrose | carb · poor | - | 1.6 |
| 12 | DL-Methionine | Methionine | supplement · good | - | 1.6 |
| 13 | Xylose | Xylose | additive · poor | - | 1.6 |
| 14 | Sunflower Oil | Sunflower oil | oil · good | - | 1.5 |
| 15 | Flaxseed Oil | Linseed oil | oil · good | - | 1.5 |
| 16 | Yucca Schidigera | Yucca Schidigera | supplement · good | - | 1.5 |
| 17 | Rosehip | Rose Hip | veg · good | - | 1.4 |
| 18 | Sweet Potato | Sweet Potatoes | carb · good | - | 1.4 |
| 19 | Carrot | Carrots | veg · good | - | 1.4 |
| 20 | Spinach | Spinach | veg · good | - | 1.3 |
| 21 | Pumpkin | Pumpkin | veg · good | - | 1.3 |
| 22 | Kale | Kale | veg · good | - | 1.3 |
| 23 | Broccoli | Broccoli | veg · good | - | 1.2 |
| 24 | Tomato | Tomato | veg · good | - | 1.2 |
| 25 | Apple | Apples | veg · good | - | 1.2 |
| 26 | Cranberry | Cranberries | veg · good | - | 1.1 |
| 27 | Blueberry | Blueberries | veg · good | - | 1.1 |
| 28 | Rosemary | Rosemary | veg · good | - | 1.1 |
| 29 | Parsley | Parsley | veg · good | - | 1.0 |
| 30 | Turmeric | Turmeric | veg · good | - | 1.0 |
| 31 | Green Tea. | Green Tea | veg · good | - | 1.0 |
- 1. Ocean Fish (23%)23% declared23.0% estimated
- 2. Chicken Meat (15%)15% declared15.0% estimated
- 3. Chicken Frames (12%)12% declared12.0% estimated
- 4. Chicken Liver (12%)12% declared12.0% estimated
- 5. Prebiotics (Chicory)1.9% estimated
- 6. Vitamins & Minerals1.8% estimated
- 7. Cassia Gum1.8% estimated
- 8. Guar Gum1.8% estimated
- 9. Carrageenan1.7% estimated
- 10. Glycine1.7% estimated
- 11. Dextrose1.6% estimated
- 12. DL-Methionine1.6% estimated
- 13. Xylose1.6% estimated
- 14. Sunflower Oil1.5% estimated
- 15. Flaxseed Oil1.5% estimated
- 16. Yucca Schidigera1.5% estimated
- 17. Rosehip1.4% estimated
- 18. Sweet Potato1.4% estimated
- 19. Carrot1.4% estimated
- 20. Spinach1.3% estimated
- 21. Pumpkin1.3% estimated
- 22. Kale1.3% estimated
- 23. Broccoli1.2% estimated
- 24. Tomato1.2% estimated
- 25. Apple1.2% estimated
- 26. Cranberry1.1% estimated
- 27. Blueberry1.1% estimated
- 28. Rosemary1.1% estimated
- 29. Parsley1.0% estimated
- 30. Turmeric1.0% estimated
- 31. Green Tea.1.0% estimated
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-18
Brand and contact: About Us
- Address
- Hawkesbury Valley
- Contact page
- befrankpets.com.au
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-18
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- befrankpets.com.au
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
The food scored 67 out of 100. The overall quality of the ingredient list contributed +4.4 points, and the meat content added +4.2 points. On the other hand, ingredients without printed percentages deducted -4 points, while the additives in the recipe contributed +2.5 points.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.5 | 9.191 | +4.41 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 44.1% | 0.096 | +4.24 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 4.6% | -0.115 | -0.53 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 7.7% | -0.092 | -0.71 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 8.2% | -0.005 | -0.04 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 15.6% | 0.163 | +2.55 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 19.7% | -0.012 | -0.24 |
| Recipe graded poor | 6.7% | -0.065 | -0.44 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 4 | -0.876 | -3.50 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 1.8% | 0.060 | +0.11 |
| Undeclared quantities | 38.0% | -0.106 | -4.01 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | yes | 0.707 | +0.71 |
| Additive penalty | -8.27 | 0.222 | -1.83 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 33.786 | +33.79 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | yes | -0.672 | -0.67 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.5 | 9.191 | +4.41 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 44.1% | 0.096 | +4.24 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 4.6% | -0.115 | -0.53 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 7.7% | -0.092 | -0.71 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 8.2% | -0.005 | -0.04 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 15.6% | 0.163 | +2.55 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 19.7% | -0.012 | -0.24 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.375 | +0.00 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.027 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 6.7% | -0.065 | -0.44 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 4 | -0.876 | -3.50 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 1.8% | 0.060 | +0.11 |
| Undeclared quantities | 38.0% | -0.106 | -4.01 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | yes | 0.707 | +0.71 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | no | -3.158 | +0.00 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | -8.27 | 0.222 | -1.83 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 33.786 | +33.79 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | yes | -0.672 | -0.67 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- -0.08
- Subtotal
- 66.9
- Final score
- 67/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
Guaranteed-analysis FEDIAF score: crude minimums and maximums are bounds, not typical values; moisture (a maximum) uses the processing median where available; experimental US score.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 7.8 | 35.5 (band 23.522727272727273 to 40%) | 100 |
| Fat | 5.5 | 25 (band 7.1875 to 20%) | 100 |
| Calcium | 0.2 | 0.9 (band 0.6534090909090909 to 2.5%) | 78.3 |
| Phosphorus | 0.2 | 0.9 (band 0.5227272727272728 to 1.6%) | 91.5 |
| Calcium:phosphorus ratio | 1 | 1 (band 1 to 2%) | 70 |
| Omega fatty acids (omega-6 and omega-3) | - | - | 100 |
| Energy (kcal/100g) | 115 | 522.7 | 100 |
Omega fatty acids (omega-6 and omega-3): scored as the mean of its declared components (omega-6 100). The FEDIAF minimum for omega-6 is linoleic acid specifically.
Scored over 7 declared nutrients (combined weight 90); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score. Moisture was not declared and was estimated at 78% from the food type.
No nutritional additives section declared on the label.
Low confidence: partial analysis or moisture estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (62% of the recipe mass) (voluntary) | 12.4/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) | 5/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared, Additives declared, Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
See all current recalls we track.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
100/100 · moderate — 2 checkable claims: 2 consistent, 0 contradicted.
Consistent with the label
- "grain free" — supported by the declared grain-free data.
- "complete and balanced diet for adult dogs" — supported by the declared complete and balanced data.
8 further claims on file that we cannot check against the label.
Moderate: every checkable claim is consistent with the declared label.
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| protein and omega 3 fatty acids that help maintain skin, coat and muscle health (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| rich in omega-3, calcium, and vitamin D, which help support healthy bones, teeth, brain function, and heart health (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| source of high-quality protein, essential vitamins and minerals, which help support muscle development and metabolic function (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| potent source of the natural antioxidant vitamin C and helps support immune and skin health (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| 95% meat, organs & superfoods (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| grain free (on pack) | Free-from | consistent | Manufacturer assertion |
| natural source of vitamins, minerals, antioxidants, and phytonutrients, supporting immune health and promoting healthy digestion (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| rich source of alpha linolenic acid which helps support healthy joint, heart and brain health (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| contains curcumin which can help support healthy joints (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| complete and balanced diet for adult dogs (on page) | Content | consistent | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Alternatives to Ocean Fish & Chicken Pâté
Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.