Wolf Tucker vs WrexRaw
How the two brands stack up across Open Dog Food's ratings, ingredients and prices.
Wolf Tucker scores higher overall: a typical (median) meal rating of 93/100 (Good) across 8 rated meals, versus 61.5/100 (Average) for WrexRaw across 6 rated meals.
| Wolf Tucker | WrexRaw | |
|---|---|---|
| Products | 11 | 14 |
| Rated meals | 8 | 6 |
| Median meal rating | 93Goodhigher | 62Average |
| Recipe (median) | 93higher | 62 |
| Nutritional (median) | 100higher · 100% medium | 95 · 100% medium |
| Transparency (median) | 60higher | 45 |
| Safety (median) | 100 | 100 |
| Evidence (median) | 33 · 100% limited | 33 · 100% limited |
| Score range | 93 to 95 | 61 to 92 |
| Complete recipes | 8 of 11 | 6 of 14 |
| High-meat recipes | 100% | 100% |
| Clear-label recipes | 100% | 33% |
| Formats | Raw | Raw |
| Recall history | None recorded in our database | None recorded in our database |
Based on 8 rated meals for Wolf Tucker and 6 for WrexRaw; small samples swing easily as products are added or updated.
Top-rated products
Frequently asked questions
Which brand rates higher, Wolf Tucker or WrexRaw?
Wolf Tucker's typical (median) meal rating is 93/100 (Good) across 8 rated meals, compared with 61.5/100 (Average) for WrexRaw across 6 rated meals.
Which brand has more high-meat recipes?
Both brands have the same share of high-meat recipes: 100% of their rated meals contain at least 30% meat on a dry-matter basis.
How are these ratings calculated?
Open Dog Food parses each published ingredient list, estimates missing quantities, converts every ingredient to its dry-matter share and scores the recipe from 1 to 100. The full method is on the methodology page.