Pooch & Mutt vs Skippers
How the two brands stack up across Open Dog Food's ratings, ingredients and prices.
Pooch & Mutt scores higher overall: a typical (median) meal rating of 70/100 (Good) across 24 rated meals, versus 69.5/100 (Average) for Skippers across 6 rated meals.
| Pooch & Mutt | Skippers | |
|---|---|---|
| Products | 70 | 55 |
| Rated meals | 24 | 6 |
| Median meal rating | 70Goodhigher | 70Average |
| Recipe (median) | 70higher | 70 |
| Nutritional (median) | 98higher · 71% high, 29% medium | 97 · 67% medium, 33% low |
| Transparency (median) | 91higher | 60 |
| Safety (median) | 100 | 100 |
| Evidence (median) | 33 · 100% limited | 33 · 100% limited |
| Score range | 65 to 79 | 60 to 70 |
| Complete recipes | 24 of 70 | 6 of 55 |
| High-meat recipes | 83% | 100% |
| Clear-label recipes | 100% | 100% |
| Formats | Dry Air Dried, Dry Baked, Dry Extruded, Dry Freeze Dried, Dry Semi Moist, Fresh Shelf, Wet Chunks, Wet Pate | Dry Air Dried, Dry Extruded |
| Recall history | None recorded in our database | None recorded in our database |
Based on 24 rated meals for Pooch & Mutt and 6 for Skippers; small samples swing easily as products are added or updated.
Top-rated products
Frequently asked questions
Which brand rates higher, Pooch & Mutt or Skippers?
Pooch & Mutt's typical (median) meal rating is 70/100 (Good) across 24 rated meals, compared with 69.5/100 (Average) for Skippers across 6 rated meals.
Which brand has more high-meat recipes?
Skippers has the higher share: 100% of rated meals are high-meat, versus 83% for Pooch & Mutt.
How are these ratings calculated?
Open Dog Food parses each published ingredient list, estimates missing quantities, converts every ingredient to its dry-matter share and scores the recipe from 1 to 100. The full method is on the methodology page.