Hill's vs Seven

How the two brands stack up across Open Dog Food's ratings, ingredients and prices.

Seven scores higher overall: a typical (median) meal rating of 69/100 (Average) across 28 rated meals, versus 47/100 (Average) for Hill's across 48 rated meals.

Hill'sSeven
Products7732
Rated meals4828
Median meal rating47Average69Averagehigher
Recipe (median)4769higher
Nutritional (median)89 · 79% high, 21% medium99higher · 54% high, 46% medium
Transparency (median)6060
Safety (median)100100
Evidence (median)33 · 100% limited33 · 100% limited
Score range17 to 6064 to 81
Complete recipes75 of 7728 of 32
High-meat recipes6%100%
Clear-label recipes77%100%
FormatsDry Extruded, Fresh Shelf, Wet Chunks, Wet PateDry Extruded, Fresh Shelf, Wet Chunks
Recall historyNone recorded in our databaseNone recorded in our database

Top-rated products

Frequently asked questions

Which brand rates higher, Hill's or Seven?

Seven's typical (median) meal rating is 69/100 (Average) across 28 rated meals, compared with 47/100 (Average) for Hill's across 48 rated meals.

Which brand has more high-meat recipes?

Seven has the higher share: 100% of rated meals are high-meat, versus 6% for Hill's.

How are these ratings calculated?

Open Dog Food parses each published ingredient list, estimates missing quantities, converts every ingredient to its dry-matter share and scores the recipe from 1 to 100. The full method is on the methodology page.

Compare specific products All Hill's productsAll Seven products
Hill's vs Seven: ratings, prices and ingredients compared · Open Dog Food