Hill's vs Pooch & Mutt

How the two brands stack up across Open Dog Food's ratings, ingredients and prices.

Pooch & Mutt scores higher overall: a typical (median) meal rating of 70/100 (Good) across 24 rated meals, versus 47/100 (Average) for Hill's across 48 rated meals.

Hill'sPooch & Mutt
Products7770
Rated meals4824
Median meal rating47Average70Goodhigher
Recipe (median)4770higher
Nutritional (median)89 · 79% high, 21% medium98higher · 71% high, 29% medium
Transparency (median)6091higher
Safety (median)100100
Evidence (median)33 · 100% limited33 · 100% limited
Score range17 to 6065 to 79
Complete recipes75 of 7724 of 70
High-meat recipes6%83%
Clear-label recipes77%100%
FormatsDry Extruded, Fresh Shelf, Wet Chunks, Wet PateDry Air Dried, Dry Baked, Dry Extruded, Dry Freeze Dried, Dry Semi Moist, Fresh Shelf, Wet Chunks, Wet Pate
Recall historyNone recorded in our databaseNone recorded in our database

Top-rated products

Frequently asked questions

Which brand rates higher, Hill's or Pooch & Mutt?

Pooch & Mutt's typical (median) meal rating is 70/100 (Good) across 24 rated meals, compared with 47/100 (Average) for Hill's across 48 rated meals.

Which brand has more high-meat recipes?

Pooch & Mutt has the higher share: 83% of rated meals are high-meat, versus 6% for Hill's.

How are these ratings calculated?

Open Dog Food parses each published ingredient list, estimates missing quantities, converts every ingredient to its dry-matter share and scores the recipe from 1 to 100. The full method is on the methodology page.

Compare specific products All Hill's productsAll Pooch & Mutt products
Hill's vs Pooch & Mutt: ratings, prices and ingredients compared · Open Dog Food