Cotswold Raw vs Hill's
How the two brands stack up across Open Dog Food's ratings, ingredients and prices.
Cotswold Raw scores higher overall: a typical (median) meal rating of 94/100 (Good) across 15 rated meals, versus 47/100 (Average) for Hill's across 48 rated meals.
| Cotswold Raw | Hill's | |
|---|---|---|
| Products | 17 | 77 |
| Rated meals | 15 | 48 |
| Median meal rating | 94Goodhigher | 47Average |
| Recipe (median) | 94higher | 47 |
| Nutritional (median) | 95higher · 100% medium | 89 · 79% high, 21% medium |
| Transparency (median) | 60 | 60 |
| Safety (median) | 100 | 100 |
| Evidence (median) | 33 · 100% limited | 33 · 100% limited |
| Score range | 93 to 97 | 17 to 60 |
| Complete recipes | 15 of 17 | 75 of 77 |
| High-meat recipes | 100% | 6% |
| Clear-label recipes | 100% | 77% |
| Formats | Dry Freeze Dried, Raw | Dry Extruded, Fresh Shelf, Wet Chunks, Wet Pate |
| Recall history | None recorded in our database | None recorded in our database |
Top-rated products
Frequently asked questions
Which brand rates higher, Cotswold Raw or Hill's?
Cotswold Raw's typical (median) meal rating is 94/100 (Good) across 15 rated meals, compared with 47/100 (Average) for Hill's across 48 rated meals.
Which brand has more high-meat recipes?
Cotswold Raw has the higher share: 100% of rated meals are high-meat, versus 6% for Hill's.
How are these ratings calculated?
Open Dog Food parses each published ingredient list, estimates missing quantities, converts every ingredient to its dry-matter share and scores the recipe from 1 to 100. The full method is on the methodology page.