Cotswold Raw vs Durham Animal Feeds
How the two brands stack up across Open Dog Food's ratings, ingredients and prices.
Cotswold Raw scores higher overall: a typical (median) meal rating of 94/100 (Good) across 15 rated meals, versus 77/100 (Good) for Durham Animal Feeds across 4 rated meals.
| Cotswold Raw | Durham Animal Feeds | |
|---|---|---|
| Products | 17 | 48 |
| Rated meals | 15 | 4 |
| Median meal rating | 94Goodhigher | 77Good |
| Recipe (median) | 94higher | 77 |
| Nutritional (median) | 95 · 100% medium | 100higher · 75% medium, 25% low |
| Transparency (median) | 60higher | 55 |
| Safety (median) | 100 | 100 |
| Evidence (median) | 33 · 100% limited | 33 · 100% limited |
| Score range | 93 to 97 | 77 to 84 |
| Complete recipes | 15 of 17 | 4 of 48 |
| High-meat recipes | 100% | 25% |
| Clear-label recipes | 100% | 0% |
| Formats | Dry Freeze Dried, Raw | Dry Air Dried, Dry Baked, Dry Extruded, Fresh Chilled, Fresh Frozen, Fresh Shelf, Raw, Wet Pate |
| Recall history | None recorded in our database | None recorded in our database |
Based on 15 rated meals for Cotswold Raw and 4 for Durham Animal Feeds; small samples swing easily as products are added or updated.
Top-rated products
Frequently asked questions
Which brand rates higher, Cotswold Raw or Durham Animal Feeds?
Cotswold Raw's typical (median) meal rating is 94/100 (Good) across 15 rated meals, compared with 77/100 (Good) for Durham Animal Feeds across 4 rated meals.
Which brand has more high-meat recipes?
Cotswold Raw has the higher share: 100% of rated meals are high-meat, versus 25% for Durham Animal Feeds.
How are these ratings calculated?
Open Dog Food parses each published ingredient list, estimates missing quantities, converts every ingredient to its dry-matter share and scores the recipe from 1 to 100. The full method is on the methodology page.