Bella & Duke vs Wolf Tucker
How the two brands stack up across Open Dog Food's ratings, ingredients and prices.
Bella & Duke scores higher overall: a typical (median) meal rating of 95/100 (Good) across 15 rated meals, versus 93/100 (Good) for Wolf Tucker across 8 rated meals.
| Bella & Duke | Wolf Tucker | |
|---|---|---|
| Products | 15 | 11 |
| Rated meals | 15 | 8 |
| Median meal rating | 95Goodhigher | 93Good |
| Recipe (median) | 95higher | 93 |
| Nutritional (median) | 74 · 100% medium | 100higher · 100% medium |
| Transparency (median) | 60 | 60 |
| Safety (median) | 100 | 100 |
| Evidence (median) | 33 · 100% limited | 33 · 100% limited |
| Score range | 87 to 96 | 93 to 94 |
| Complete recipes | 15 of 15 | 8 of 11 |
| High-meat recipes | 100% | 100% |
| Clear-label recipes | 93% | 38% |
| Formats | Raw | Raw |
| Recall history | None recorded in our database | None recorded in our database |
Based on 15 rated meals for Bella & Duke and 8 for Wolf Tucker; small samples swing easily as products are added or updated.
Top-rated products
Frequently asked questions
Which brand rates higher, Bella & Duke or Wolf Tucker?
Bella & Duke's typical (median) meal rating is 95/100 (Good) across 15 rated meals, compared with 93/100 (Good) for Wolf Tucker across 8 rated meals.
Which brand has more high-meat recipes?
Both brands have the same share of high-meat recipes: 100% of their rated meals contain at least 30% meat on a dry-matter basis.
How are these ratings calculated?
Open Dog Food parses each published ingredient list, estimates missing quantities, converts every ingredient to its dry-matter share and scores the recipe from 1 to 100. The full method is on the methodology page.