Our verdict
Is myFurbaby Chicken Dog Box a good dog food?
We score it 44/100 (Poor). The main reasons are set out in "Why you might not" below, and every step of the calculation is shown under "How we calculated this score".
Only part of the analytical constituents are declared, so the nutritional picture is incomplete.
100% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for all lifestages
- Grain-free: no grain ingredients listed
- Doesn't list turkey, lamb, venison, pork, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids chicken: the label lists dried chicken protein
- Your dog avoids beef: the label lists beef
- Your dog avoids fish: the label lists fish meal
- You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Ingredients (37)100% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- supplement 54.7%
- veg 10.5%
- meat 10.2%
- additive 9.3%
- carb 6.9%
- oil 6.5%
- mineral 2.0%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Chicken Meal | Dried chicken protein | meat · good | - | 3.6 |
| 2 | Peas | Peas | veg · good | - | 3.5 |
| 3 | Potatoes | Potatoes | carb · medium | - | 3.5 |
| 4 | Tapioca | Tapioca | carb · medium | - | 3.4 |
| 5 | Chicken Fat (preserved with Mixed Tocopherols) | Chicken Oil and Fat | oil · good | - | 3.4 |
| 6 | Fish Meal | Fish Meal | meat · medium | - | 3.3 |
| 7 | Beef Meal | Beef | meat · medium | - | 3.3 |
| 8 | Flaxseed | Linseed | veg · good | - | 3.2 |
| 9 | Natural Flavor | Flavor | additive · poor | - | 3.2 |
| 10 | Bentonite | Bentonite And Bentonite Montmorillonite | additive · medium | - | 3.1 |
| 11 | Fish Oil | Fish Oil | oil · good | - | 3.1 |
| 12 | Potassium Chloride | Potassium Chloride | supplement · medium | - | 3.0 |
| 13 | Sodium Chloride | Salt | additive · poor | - | 3.0 |
| 14 | Dried Seaweed | Dried Sea Algae | supplement · good | - | 2.9 |
| 15 | Magnesium Sulfate | Magnesium sulfate | supplement · good | - | 2.9 |
| 16 | Choline Chloride | Choline | supplement · good | - | 2.8 |
| 17 | Calcium Propionate | Calcium Carbonate | supplement · medium | - | 2.8 |
| 18 | Vitamin E Supplement | Vitamin E | supplement · good | - | 2.8 |
| 19 | Niacin (Vitamin B3) | Niacin | supplement · good | - | 2.7 |
| 20 | Calcium Pantothenate (Vitamin B5) | Calcium pantothenate | supplement · good | - | 2.7 |
| 21 | Vitamin A Supplement | Vitamin A | supplement · good | - | 2.6 |
| 22 | Thiamine Mononitrate (Vitamin B1) | Thiamine mononitrate | supplement · good | - | 2.6 |
| 23 | Riboflavin Supplement | Riboflavin | supplement · good | - | 2.5 |
| 24 | Pyridoxine Hydrochloride (Vitamin B6) | Pyridoxine hydrochloride | supplement · good | - | 2.5 |
| 25 | Vitamin B12 Supplement | Vitamin B12 | supplement · good | - | 2.4 |
| 26 | Vitamin D3 Supplement | Vitamin D3 supplement | supplement · good | - | 2.4 |
| 27 | Folic Acid (Vitamin B9) | Folic acid | supplement · good | - | 2.3 |
| 28 | Taurine | Taurine | supplement · good | - | 2.3 |
| 29 | Zinc Sulfate | Zinc sulfate | supplement · medium | - | 2.2 |
| 30 | Ferrous Sulfate | Iron sulfate | supplement · good | - | 2.2 |
| 31 | Copper Sulfate | Copper sulphate | supplement · good | - | 2.1 |
| 32 | Manganese Sulfate | Manganese sulfate | supplement · medium | - | 2.1 |
| 33 | Calcium Iodate | Calcium iodate | supplement · medium | - | 2.0 |
| 34 | Cobalt Sulfate | Cobalt Sulfate | mineral · medium | - | 2.0 |
| 35 | Sodium Selenite | Sodium selenite | supplement · poor | - | 1.9 |
| 36 | Green Tea Extract | Green Tea | veg · good | - | 1.9 |
| 37 | Rosemary Extract and Spearmint Extract. | Spearmint | veg · good | - | 1.8 |
- 1. Chicken Meal3.6% estimated
- 2. Peas3.5% estimated
- 3. Potatoes3.5% estimated
- 4. Tapioca3.4% estimated
- 5. Chicken Fat (preserved with Mixed Tocopherols)3.4% estimated
- 6. Fish Meal3.3% estimated
- 7. Beef Meal3.3% estimated
- 8. Flaxseed3.2% estimated
- 9. Natural Flavor3.2% estimated
- 10. Bentonite3.1% estimated
- 11. Fish Oil3.1% estimated
- 12. Potassium Chloride3.0% estimated
- 13. Sodium Chloride3.0% estimated
- 14. Dried Seaweed2.9% estimated
- 15. Magnesium Sulfate2.9% estimated
- 16. Choline Chloride2.8% estimated
- 17. Calcium Propionate2.8% estimated
- 18. Vitamin E Supplement2.8% estimated
- 19. Niacin (Vitamin B3)2.7% estimated
- 20. Calcium Pantothenate (Vitamin B5)2.7% estimated
- 21. Vitamin A Supplement2.6% estimated
- 22. Thiamine Mononitrate (Vitamin B1)2.6% estimated
- 23. Riboflavin Supplement2.5% estimated
- 24. Pyridoxine Hydrochloride (Vitamin B6)2.5% estimated
- 25. Vitamin B12 Supplement2.4% estimated
- 26. Vitamin D3 Supplement2.4% estimated
- 27. Folic Acid (Vitamin B9)2.3% estimated
- 28. Taurine2.3% estimated
- 29. Zinc Sulfate2.2% estimated
- 30. Ferrous Sulfate2.2% estimated
- 31. Copper Sulfate2.1% estimated
- 32. Manganese Sulfate2.1% estimated
- 33. Calcium Iodate2.0% estimated
- 34. Cobalt Sulfate2.0% estimated
- 35. Sodium Selenite1.9% estimated
- 36. Green Tea Extract1.9% estimated
- 37. Rosemary Extract and Spearmint Extract.1.8% estimated
Nutrition and feedingProtein 28% · Fat 14%
Declared analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed |
|---|---|
| Protein | 28% |
| Fat | 14% |
| Fibre | 4% |
| Moisture | 10% |
| Calcium | 2.50% |
| Phosphorus | 1.60% |
Energy: 338 kcal/100g
Additives & feeding info
No additives recorded yet.
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-27
Brand and contact: myFurbaby
- Website
- https://myfurbaby.co.nz/
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-27
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- myfurbaby.co.nz
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Brand and retailer reviews
External platform ratings are not scores for this individual recipe.
Trustpilot: 4.4/5 · 32 reviews
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
This recipe achieves an overall rating of 44 out of 100 based on several key factors. The overall quality of the ingredient list contributed +5.5 points to the total. However, ingredients without printed percentages reduced the score by -10.6, the processing format subtracted -6.7, and the additive load contributed -2.5 points.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.6 | 9.191 | +5.49 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 2.1% | -0.115 | -0.24 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 7.8% | -0.092 | -0.72 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 4.9% | -0.005 | -0.03 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 10.2% | 0.163 | +1.66 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 61.3% | -0.012 | -0.75 |
| Recipe graded poor | 8.1% | -0.065 | -0.53 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 3 | -0.876 | -2.63 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 3.2% | 0.060 | +0.19 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| Additive penalty | -11.24 | 0.222 | -2.49 |
| Processing multiplier | 0.98 | 33.786 | +33.11 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.6 | 9.191 | +5.49 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.096 | +0.00 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 2.1% | -0.115 | -0.24 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 7.8% | -0.092 | -0.72 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 4.9% | -0.005 | -0.03 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 10.2% | 0.163 | +1.66 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 61.3% | -0.012 | -0.75 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.375 | +0.00 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.027 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 8.1% | -0.065 | -0.53 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 3 | -0.876 | -2.63 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 3.2% | 0.060 | +0.19 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | no | 2.294 | +0.00 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | no | 0.707 | +0.00 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | -11.24 | 0.222 | -2.49 |
| Processing multiplier | 0.98 | 33.786 | +33.11 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- +0.02
- Subtotal
- 43.6
- Final score
- 44/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
Guaranteed-analysis FEDIAF score: crude minimums and maximums are bounds, not typical values; moisture (a maximum) uses the processing median where available; experimental US score.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 28 | 30.9 (band 18 to 40%) | 100 |
| Fat | 14 | 15.5 (band 5.5 to 20%) | 100 |
| Fibre | 4 | 4.4 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 100 |
| Calcium | 2.5 | 2.8 (band 0.5 to 2.5%) | 89.5 |
| Phosphorus | 1.6 | 1.8 (band 0.4 to 1.6%) | 89.5 |
| Calcium:phosphorus ratio | 1.6 | 1.6 (band 1 to 2%) | 100 |
| Energy (kcal/100g) | 338 | 373.5 | 100 |
Scored over 7 declared nutrients (combined weight 90); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score. Moisture was not declared and was estimated at 9.5% from the food type.
No nutritional additives section declared on the label.
Low confidence: partial analysis or moisture estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (voluntary) - not on file | 0/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) | 5/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) - not on file | 0/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared, Additives declared, Feeding guidance given, Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
Claims on file; none we can check against the label
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| all natural (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| grain free (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| 100% Natural (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| made in New Zealand (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| all local ingredients (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| eco-friendly packaging (that's also made in NZ) (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Alternatives to Chicken Dog Box
Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.




