Dr. Clauder's Trainee Snack Rind

Treat complementary Clear label Full label

Trainee Snack Rind
This is a treat, not a complete diet. The 1–100 rating applies to complete foods, so it isn't scored. Ingredient breakdown below.

Is Dr. Clauder's Trainee Snack Rind a good dog food?

This is a treat, not a complete diet, so it is not scored on our 1-100 scale. The ingredient breakdown below shows what is in it; a treat should be fed alongside, not instead of, a complete diet.

How we score

Complementary air-dried treats for dogs of all life stages, with rind, vegetable by and inulin as the main ingredients.

Why you might choose it

  • Prints ingredient percentages on the label.
  • Prints a percentage for nearly every ingredient, so the recipe is fully auditable.
  • Doesn't list grain ingredients.

Why you might not

  • A treat, not a complete diet: feed as an extra, not the whole diet.
  • 2 poor-graded ingredients make up about 98% of the recipe.
  • High in fat: 21% fat on a dry-matter basis.

View the source page

What the label tells us

Why is this treat not scored?

Our 1 to 100 rating applies to complete diets, so treats and complementary foods are presented as what the label tells us rather than a number that would invite comparison with complete meals.

What should I look for on a treat label?

A short ingredient list, named animal sources instead of generic terms, and no artificial colours or preservatives. Printed quantities are a good transparency signal, though few treat labels provide them.

These points are derived from the published ingredient list, not a rating.

Estimated composition

other97.6%
supplement1.9%
fibre0.5%

Typical analysis (as fed)

Protein
22.80%
Fat
17%
Fibre
1.80%
Ash
13.80%
Moisture
17.40%

Additives & feeding info

Nutritional additives

Vitamin A 40000 IE; Vitamin D3 1600 IE; Vitamin E 200 mg; Vitamin C 115 mg; Vitamin B1 57 mg; Vitamin B2 38 mg; Vitamin B6 24 mg; Vitamin B12 90 mcg; Niacin 96 mg; Calcium-D-Pantothenat 60 mg; Folsäure 4.8 mg; Biotin 160 mcg

Technological additives

Konservierungsmittel; Verdickungsmittel; mit Farbstoff; Aromastoff

Storage

Vor Feuchtigkeit schützen! Kühl und trocken aufbewahren!

Feeding guide

Täglich einige Stücke zur Belohnung geben. Stets frisches Wasser bereitstellen!

Who is this food for?

Suits

  • Labelled by the manufacturer for all lifestages
  • Grain-free: no grain ingredients listed
  • Doesn't list chicken, beef, turkey, lamb, fish, venison, pork, duck as ingredients

Consider something else if:

  • You are limiting fat: 20.6% on a dry-matter basis is in the high band

These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Use the homepage filter to find foods that fit your dog.

Ingredients (4)

#As declaredMatchedCategoryTierDeclared %Est. %
1Rind 95%Rindotherpoor9595.0
2vegetable by-productsVegetable By-Productsotherpoor-2.6
3Inulin (FOS) 0.5%Inulinfibregood0.50.5
4mineralsVitamins and mineralssupplementmedium-1.9

Brand

Trust and provenance

Recall history
No recalls recorded in our database
Label data last checked
2026-09-09
Product page
www.dr-clauder.com

Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.

Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.

Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated

Scored with model v2 on 2026-09-22. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.

ComponentInputCoefficientContribution
Base score-32.336+32.34
Average ingredient quality-0.99.915-9.24
Supplement share of dry matter3.5%-0.009-0.03
Other share of dry matter95.6%-0.371-35.49
Recipe graded poor97.6%-0.045-4.37
Number of poor ingredients2-0.868-1.74
Largest single poor ingredient95.0%0.056+5.35
Undeclared quantities4.5%-0.131-0.59
Prints ingredient percentagesyes3.194+3.19
Low meat (under 10% of dry matter)yes-1.988-1.99
Processing multiplier1.0032.336+32.34
Processing: Dry Air Driedyes9.320+9.32
Show all 40 components
ComponentInputCoefficientContribution
Base score-32.336+32.34
Average ingredient quality-0.99.915-9.24
Meat share of dry matter0.0%0.116+0.00
Carb share of dry matter0.0%-0.113+0.00
Oil share of dry matter0.0%-0.088+0.00
Vegetable share of dry matter0.0%-0.002+0.00
Additive share of dry matter0.0%0.177+0.00
Supplement share of dry matter3.5%-0.009-0.03
Other share of dry matter95.6%-0.371-35.49
Unrecognised share of dry matter0.0%-0.022+0.00
Recipe graded poor97.6%-0.045-4.37
Poor-quality meat in recipe0.0%-0.182+0.00
Number of poor ingredients2-0.868-1.74
Largest single poor ingredient95.0%0.056+5.35
Undeclared quantities4.5%-0.131-0.59
Prints ingredient percentagesyes3.194+3.19
Complete dietno1.703+0.00
Frozen or chilled freshno11.440+0.00
High meat (30%+ of dry matter)no-0.506+0.00
Low meat (under 10% of dry matter)yes-1.988-1.99
High carb and low meatno-1.250+0.00
Meat share × printed percentages0.0-0.073+0.00
Meat share × fresh0.0-0.339+0.00
Fresh × high meat0.016.475+0.00
Additive penalty0.000.236+0.00
Processing multiplier1.0032.336+32.34
Processing: Rawno13.322+0.00
Processing: Fresh Chilledno7.712+0.00
Processing: Fresh Frozenno6.583+0.00
Processing: Fresh Refrigeratedno4.857+0.00
Processing: Fresh Shelfno0.072+0.00
Processing: Dry Freeze Driedno11.127+0.00
Processing: Dry Air Driedyes9.320+9.32
Processing: Dry Cold Pressedno4.569+0.00
Processing: Dry Bakedno-2.321+0.00
Processing: Dry Extrudedno-6.996+0.00
Processing: Dry Semi Moistno-6.833+0.00
Processing: Dry Mueslino-10.711+0.00
Processing: Wet Pateno2.935+0.00
Processing: Wet Chunksno2.292+0.00
Processing-type offset
+0.10
Additives declared on label
+2 transparency bonus
Nearly all quantities printed on label
+2 full-disclosure bonus
Subtotal
33.2
Final score
33/100

Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.

This is not a complete diet, so the 1-100 rating does not apply to it. Read the recipe breakdown above as ingredient-quality context only.

Score history across model versions

The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.

ModelScore
v233/100current
v147/100
v1.948/100
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges

Not applicable to complementary food. FEDIAF reference ranges apply to complete diets.

Transparency: what the label discloses

How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.

ItemPoints
Ingredient list on the label (mandatory)10/10
Printed percentages on the label (95.5% of the recipe mass) (voluntary)19.1/20
Analytical constituents declared (mandatory)15/15
Additives declared (mandatory)10/10
Energy value declared (voluntary) - not on file0/5
Complete/complementary designation (mandatory)5/5
Feeding guidance given (mandatory)10/10
Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory)5/10
Country of manufacture stated (voluntary)10/10
Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file0/5

Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Batch and date labelling).

Safety: recall history

Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.

No recalls recorded in our database.

See all current recalls we track.

Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it

The marketing claims made on the pack and product page, and how much evidence sits behind them. We record the claims as stated; we do not assess whether they are true.

ClaimTypeSubstantiation
Mit FOS zur Förderung einer gesunden Verdauung und Nährstoffaufnahme (on page)FunctionalManufacturer assertion
Enthält 95% hochwertiges Rinderfleisch (on page)ContentManufacturer assertion

Limited: at least one claim rests on manufacturer assertion alone.

The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.

Other products from Dr. Clauder's

Community

Owners' verdict
0 votes

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.

Comments are reviewed before they appear.