Dogsee Chew Gigabites Apple & Peanut Cookies

Treat complementary

This is a treat, not a complete diet. The 1–100 rating applies to complete foods, so it isn't scored. Ingredient breakdown below.

Is Dogsee Chew Gigabites Apple & Peanut Cookies a good dog food?

This is a treat, not a complete diet, so it is not scored on our 1-100 scale. The ingredient breakdown below shows what is in it; a treat should be fed alongside, not instead of, a complete diet.

How we score

100% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.

Complementary baked dry treats for dogs of all life stages, with rice flour, gram flour and peanuts as the main ingredients.

Why you might choose it

  • Low in fat for its format: 7% fat on a dry-matter basis.

Why you might not

  • A treat, not a complete diet: feed as an extra, not the whole diet.
  • 3 poor-graded ingredients make up about 32% of the recipe.
  • Low in protein: 12% protein on a dry-matter basis.

View the source page

What the label tells us

Why is this treat not scored?

Our 1 to 100 rating applies to complete diets, so treats and complementary foods are presented as what the label tells us rather than a number that would invite comparison with complete meals.

What should I look for on a treat label?

A short ingredient list, named animal sources instead of generic terms, and no artificial colours or preservatives. Printed quantities are a good transparency signal, though few treat labels provide them.

These points are derived from the published ingredient list, not a rating.

Estimated composition

carb44.0%
other26.0%
additive19.0%
unknown11.0%

Typical analysis (as fed)

Protein
11%
Fat
7%
Fibre
5%
Ash
5%
Moisture
5%

Additives & feeding info

No additives recorded yet.

Who is this food for?

Suits

  • Labelled by the manufacturer for all lifestages
  • Doesn't list chicken, beef, turkey, lamb, fish, venison, pork, duck as ingredients

Consider something else if:

  • Your dog avoids grain: the label lists rice flour
  • You need more protein than this: 11.6% on a dry-matter basis is in the low band

These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Use the homepage filter to find foods that fit your dog.

Ingredients (8)

#As declaredMatchedCategoryTierDeclared %Est. %
1Rice FlourRice flourcarbmedium-16.0
2Gram flourGram flourcarbgood-15.0
3Apple & PeanutsPeanutsothergood-14.0
4Vegetable ProteinVegetable protein extractscarbpoor-13.0
5WaterWaterother--12.0
6Jaggeryunmatched---11.0
7SaltSaltadditivepoor-10.0
8Permitted Preservatives and AntioxidantsAntioxidantsadditivepoor-9.0

Brand

Trust and provenance

Recall history
No recalls recorded in our database
Label data last checked
2026-09-14
Product page
dogseechew.co.uk

Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.

Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.

Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated

Scored with model v2 on 2026-09-22. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.

ComponentInputCoefficientContribution
Base score-32.336+32.34
Average ingredient quality0.09.915+0.39
Carb share of dry matter56.6%-0.113-6.37
Additive share of dry matter24.6%0.177+4.36
Other share of dry matter10.9%-0.371-4.06
Unrecognised share of dry matter7.9%-0.022-0.18
Recipe graded poor32.0%-0.045-1.43
Number of poor ingredients3-0.868-2.60
Largest single poor ingredient13.0%0.056+0.73
Undeclared quantities100.0%-0.131-13.09
Low meat (under 10% of dry matter)yes-1.988-1.99
High carb and low meatyes-1.250-1.25
Additive penalty-23.780.236-5.60
Processing multiplier1.0032.336+32.34
Processing: Dry Bakedyes-2.321-2.32
Show all 40 components
ComponentInputCoefficientContribution
Base score-32.336+32.34
Average ingredient quality0.09.915+0.39
Meat share of dry matter0.0%0.116+0.00
Carb share of dry matter56.6%-0.113-6.37
Oil share of dry matter0.0%-0.088+0.00
Vegetable share of dry matter0.0%-0.002+0.00
Additive share of dry matter24.6%0.177+4.36
Supplement share of dry matter0.0%-0.009+0.00
Other share of dry matter10.9%-0.371-4.06
Unrecognised share of dry matter7.9%-0.022-0.18
Recipe graded poor32.0%-0.045-1.43
Poor-quality meat in recipe0.0%-0.182+0.00
Number of poor ingredients3-0.868-2.60
Largest single poor ingredient13.0%0.056+0.73
Undeclared quantities100.0%-0.131-13.09
Prints ingredient percentagesno3.194+0.00
Complete dietno1.703+0.00
Frozen or chilled freshno11.440+0.00
High meat (30%+ of dry matter)no-0.506+0.00
Low meat (under 10% of dry matter)yes-1.988-1.99
High carb and low meatyes-1.250-1.25
Meat share × printed percentages0.0-0.073+0.00
Meat share × fresh0.0-0.339+0.00
Fresh × high meat0.016.475+0.00
Additive penalty-23.780.236-5.60
Processing multiplier1.0032.336+32.34
Processing: Rawno13.322+0.00
Processing: Fresh Chilledno7.712+0.00
Processing: Fresh Frozenno6.583+0.00
Processing: Fresh Refrigeratedno4.857+0.00
Processing: Fresh Shelfno0.072+0.00
Processing: Dry Freeze Driedno11.127+0.00
Processing: Dry Air Driedno9.320+0.00
Processing: Dry Cold Pressedno4.569+0.00
Processing: Dry Bakedyes-2.321-2.32
Processing: Dry Extrudedno-6.996+0.00
Processing: Dry Semi Moistno-6.833+0.00
Processing: Dry Mueslino-10.711+0.00
Processing: Wet Pateno2.935+0.00
Processing: Wet Chunksno2.292+0.00
Processing-type offset
+0.05
Subtotal
31.3
Final score
31/100

Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.

This is not a complete diet, so the 1-100 rating does not apply to it. Read the recipe breakdown above as ingredient-quality context only.

Score history across model versions

The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.

ModelScore
v231/100current
v131/100
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges

Not applicable to complementary food. FEDIAF reference ranges apply to complete diets.

Transparency: what the label discloses

How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.

ItemPoints
Ingredient list on the label (mandatory)10/10
Printed percentages on the label (voluntary) - not on file0/20
Analytical constituents declared (mandatory)15/15
Additives declared (mandatory) - not on file0/10
Energy value declared (voluntary) - not on file0/5
Complete/complementary designation (mandatory)5/5
Feeding guidance given (mandatory) - not on file0/10
Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory)5/10
Country of manufacture stated (voluntary)10/10
Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file0/5

Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Additives declared, Feeding guidance given, Batch and date labelling).

Safety: recall history

Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.

No recalls recorded in our database.

See all current recalls we track.

Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it

The marketing claims made on the pack and product page, and how much evidence sits behind them. We record the claims as stated; we do not assess whether they are true.

ClaimTypeSubstantiation
Apples are rich in Vitamin A, Vitamin C and antioxidants (on page)NutrientManufacturer assertion
All Natural (on page)ContentManufacturer assertion
gluten-free (on page)Free-fromManufacturer assertion
perfect for your dog’s weight management (on page)FunctionalManufacturer assertion
promote your dog's health (on page)FunctionalManufacturer assertion
rich in vitamins (on page)NutrientManufacturer assertion
protein-rich snack (on page)High/low levelManufacturer assertion

Limited: at least one claim rests on manufacturer assertion alone.

The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.

Other products from Dogsee Chew

Community

Owners' verdict
0 votes

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.

Comments are reviewed before they appear.