Pooch & Mutt vs Royal Canin

How the two brands stack up across Open Dog Food's ratings, ingredients and prices.

Pooch & Mutt scores higher overall: a typical (median) meal rating of 69/100 (Average) across 24 rated meals, versus 39/100 (Poor) for Royal Canin across 91 rated meals.

Pooch & MuttRoyal Canin
Products7095
Rated meals2491
Median meal rating69Averagehigher39Poor
Recipe (median)69higher39
Nutritional (median)98 · 71% high, 29% medium100higher · 26% medium, 74% low
Transparency (median)91higher55
Safety (median)100100
Evidence (median)33 · 100% limited33 · 100% limited
Score range63 to 7624 to 56
Complete recipes24 of 7091 of 95
High-meat recipes83%0%
Clear-label recipes100%11%
FormatsDry Air Dried, Dry Baked, Dry Extruded, Dry Freeze Dried, Dry Semi Moist, Fresh Shelf, Wet Chunks, Wet PateDry Air Dried, Dry Extruded, Wet Chunks, Wet Pate
Recall historyNone recorded in our databaseNone recorded in our database

Top-rated products

Frequently asked questions

Which brand rates higher, Pooch & Mutt or Royal Canin?

Pooch & Mutt's typical (median) meal rating is 69/100 (Average) across 24 rated meals, compared with 39/100 (Poor) for Royal Canin across 91 rated meals.

Which brand has more high-meat recipes?

Pooch & Mutt has the higher share: 83% of rated meals are high-meat, versus 0% for Royal Canin.

How are these ratings calculated?

Open Dog Food parses each published ingredient list, estimates missing quantities, converts every ingredient to its dry-matter share and scores the recipe from 1 to 100. The full method is on the methodology page.

Compare specific products →All Pooch & Mutt productsAll Royal Canin products
Pooch & Mutt vs Royal Canin: ratings, prices and ingredients compared · Open Dog Food