Bella & Duke vs Hill's
How the two brands stack up across Open Dog Food's ratings, ingredients and prices.
Bella & Duke scores higher overall: a typical (median) meal rating of 95/100 (Good) across 15 rated meals, versus 43/100 (Poor) for Hill's across 48 rated meals.
| Bella & Duke | Hill's | |
|---|---|---|
| Products | 15 | 78 |
| Rated meals | 15 | 48 |
| Median meal rating | 95Goodhigher | 43Poor |
| Recipe (median) | 95higher | 43 |
| Nutritional (median) | 74 · 100% medium | 89higher · 79% high, 21% medium |
| Transparency (median) | 60 | 60 |
| Safety (median) | 100 | 100 |
| Evidence (median) | 33 · 100% limited | 33 · 100% limited |
| Score range | 87 to 96 | 20 to 56 |
| Complete recipes | 15 of 15 | 76 of 78 |
| High-meat recipes | 100% | 6% |
| Clear-label recipes | 93% | 77% |
| Formats | Raw | Dry Extruded, Fresh Shelf, Wet Chunks, Wet Pate |
| Recall history | None recorded in our database | None recorded in our database |
Top-rated products
Frequently asked questions
Which brand rates higher, Bella & Duke or Hill's?
Bella & Duke's typical (median) meal rating is 95/100 (Good) across 15 rated meals, compared with 43/100 (Poor) for Hill's across 48 rated meals.
Which brand has more high-meat recipes?
Bella & Duke has the higher share: 100% of rated meals are high-meat, versus 6% for Hill's.
How are these ratings calculated?
Open Dog Food parses each published ingredient list, estimates missing quantities, converts every ingredient to its dry-matter share and scores the recipe from 1 to 100. The full method is on the methodology page.