Our verdict
Is Polkadog Frozen Lickin' Lamb Patties a good dog food?
We score it 58/100 (Average). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
100% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for all lifestages
- Grain-free: no grain ingredients listed
- Doesn't list chicken, beef, turkey, venison, pork, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids lamb: the label lists lamb
- Your dog avoids fish: the label lists fish oil
- You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Ingredients (17)100% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- veg 44.8%
- meat 29.0%
- oil 14.9%
- mineral 7.2%
- supplement 4.1%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lamb | Lamb | meat · medium | - | 7.7 |
| 2 | Lamb Heart | Lamb Heart | meat · good | - | 7.5 |
| 3 | Ground Lamb Bone | Bone | mineral · medium | - | 7.2 |
| 4 | Lamb Liver | Lambs Liver | meat · good | - | 7.0 |
| 5 | Lamb Kidney | Lamb Kidney | meat · good | - | 6.8 |
| 6 | Organic Spinach | Spinach | veg · good | - | 6.6 |
| 7 | Organic Broccoli | Broccoli | veg · good | - | 6.3 |
| 8 | Organic Squash | Butternut Squash | veg · good | - | 6.1 |
| 9 | Organic Pumpkin Seed | Pumpkin | veg · good | - | 5.9 |
| 10 | Organic Flax Seed | Linseed | veg · good | - | 5.7 |
| 11 | Organic Coconut Oil | Coconut Oil | oil · medium | - | 5.4 |
| 12 | Organic Dried Kelp | Kelp | veg · good | - | 5.2 |
| 13 | Fish Oil | Fish Oil | oil · good | - | 5.0 |
| 14 | Organic Alfalfa | Alfalfa | veg · good | - | 4.8 |
| 15 | Cod Liver Oil | Cod Liver Oil | oil · good | - | 4.5 |
| 16 | Organic Parsley | Parsley | veg · good | - | 4.3 |
| 17 | Vitamin E Supplement | Vitamin E | supplement · good | - | 4.1 |
- 1. Lamb7.7% estimated
- 2. Lamb Heart7.5% estimated
- 3. Ground Lamb Bone7.2% estimated
- 4. Lamb Liver7.0% estimated
- 5. Lamb Kidney6.8% estimated
- 6. Organic Spinach6.6% estimated
- 7. Organic Broccoli6.3% estimated
- 8. Organic Squash6.1% estimated
- 9. Organic Pumpkin Seed5.9% estimated
- 10. Organic Flax Seed5.7% estimated
- 11. Organic Coconut Oil5.4% estimated
- 12. Organic Dried Kelp5.2% estimated
- 13. Fish Oil5.0% estimated
- 14. Organic Alfalfa4.8% estimated
- 15. Cod Liver Oil4.5% estimated
- 16. Organic Parsley4.3% estimated
- 17. Vitamin E Supplement4.1% estimated
Nutrition and feeding
Declared analysis (as fed)
No analysis recorded yet.
Additives & feeding info
Additives declared on the label
Nutritional additives
Vitamin E Supplement
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-14
Brand and contact: Polkadog
- Website
- https://www.polkadog.com/
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-14
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- www.polkadog.com
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Brand and retailer reviews
External platform ratings are not scores for this individual recipe.
Trustpilot: 0.0/5 · 0 reviews
42 reviews on this product · 5.0/5
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
The overall score is 58 out of 100. Ingredients without printed percentages dragged the score down by -10.6 points, which was the biggest single factor in this case. The overall quality of the ingredient list contributed +7.6 points to lift the score. The oil and fat content reduced the score by -2.8 points, and the processing format reduced it by -2.4 points.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.8 | 9.191 | +7.60 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 30.6% | -0.092 | -2.81 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 30.7% | -0.005 | -0.16 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 7.7% | -0.012 | -0.09 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.10 | 33.786 | +37.16 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | yes | -2.354 | -2.35 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.8 | 9.191 | +7.60 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.096 | +0.00 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.115 | +0.00 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 30.6% | -0.092 | -2.81 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 30.7% | -0.005 | -0.16 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.163 | +0.00 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 7.7% | -0.012 | -0.09 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.375 | +0.00 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.027 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 0.0% | -0.065 | +0.00 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 0 | -0.876 | +0.00 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 0.0% | 0.060 | +0.00 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | no | 0.707 | +0.00 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | 0.00 | 0.222 | +0.00 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.10 | 33.786 | +37.16 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | yes | -2.354 | -2.35 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- -1.74
- Additives declared on label
- +1 transparency bonus
- Subtotal
- 58.1
- Final score
- 58/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
Analytical constituents not declared
Declared fortification: 1 nutritional additive on the label
- Vitamin E Supplement
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (voluntary) - not on file | 0/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) - not on file | 0/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) - not on file | 0/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared, Feeding guidance given, Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
Claims on file; none we can check against the label
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| biologically and metabolically appropriate food (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| 1:1 fat to protein ratio (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| <1% carbohydrates (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| made up of 95% meat, bone and organs, and 5% vegetables, vitamins and minerals (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Alternatives to Frozen Lickin' Lamb Patties
Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.