Our verdict
Is PAWFF Singapore Gently Cooked Lamb a good dog food?
We score it 60/100 (Average). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
Only part of the analytical constituents are declared, so the nutritional picture is incomplete.
100% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for all lifestages
- Grain-free: no grain ingredients listed
- Single named protein: lamb
- Doesn't list chicken, beef, turkey, fish, venison, pork, duck as ingredients
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Ingredients (16)100% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- meat 38.3%
- supplement 27.3%
- veg 23.5%
- mineral 6.6%
- fibre 4.3%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lamb Leg | Lamb | meat · medium | - | 8.2 |
| 2 | Lamb Heart | Lamb Heart | meat · good | - | 7.9 |
| 3 | Lamb Liver | Lambs Liver | meat · good | - | 7.7 |
| 4 | Lamb Kidney | Lamb Kidney | meat · good | - | 7.4 |
| 5 | Lamb Spleen | Lamb Spleen | meat · good | - | 7.1 |
| 6 | Strawberries | Strawberries | veg · good | - | 6.9 |
| 7 | Bone Meal | Bone meal | mineral · medium | - | 6.6 |
| 8 | Kelp | Kelp | veg · good | - | 6.4 |
| 9 | Manganese | Manganese | supplement · good | - | 6.1 |
| 10 | Zinc | Zinc Oxide | supplement · good | - | 5.9 |
| 11 | Chia Seed | Chia Seeds | veg · good | - | 5.6 |
| 12 | Vitamin D | Vitamin D | supplement · good | - | 5.4 |
| 13 | Vitamin E | Vitamin E | supplement · good | - | 5.1 |
| 14 | Choline | Choline | supplement · good | - | 4.8 |
| 15 | Spinach | Spinach | veg · good | - | 4.6 |
| 16 | Psyllium Husk. | Psyllium fibre | fibre · good | - | 4.3 |
- 1. Lamb Leg8.2% estimated
- 2. Lamb Heart7.9% estimated
- 3. Lamb Liver7.7% estimated
- 4. Lamb Kidney7.4% estimated
- 5. Lamb Spleen7.1% estimated
- 6. Strawberries6.9% estimated
- 7. Bone Meal6.6% estimated
- 8. Kelp6.4% estimated
- 9. Manganese6.1% estimated
- 10. Zinc5.9% estimated
- 11. Chia Seed5.6% estimated
- 12. Vitamin D5.4% estimated
- 13. Vitamin E5.1% estimated
- 14. Choline4.8% estimated
- 15. Spinach4.6% estimated
- 16. Psyllium Husk.4.3% estimated
Nutrition and feedingProtein 16.68% · Fat 9%
Guaranteed analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed |
|---|---|
| Protein | 16.68% |
| Fat | 9% |
| Fibre | 2.27% |
| Moisture | 70.21% |
| Carbohydrates | 2.31% |
Energy: 152 kcal/100g
Additives & feeding info
Feeding and storage
Storage
Store frozen and thaw in the refrigerator before feeding. Once thawed, consume within 48 hours.
Feeding guide
Up to 5kg: 100–150g per day; 5–10kg: 150–250g per day; 10–20kg: 250–400g per day; 20kg and above: 400g+ per day. Serve at room temperature; store frozen and thaw in the refrigerator before feeding; consume within 48 hours once thawed.
Additives declared on the label
Nutritional additives
Manganese; Zinc; Vitamin D; Vitamin E; Choline
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-20
Brand and contact: PAWFF Singapore
- Website
- https://www.pawffsg.com/
- Phone
- 96478786
- Address
- Nordcom 2, 2 Gambas Crescent, #02-04, Singapore 757044
- Contact page
- www.pawffsg.com
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-20
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- www.pawffsg.com
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Brand and retailer reviews
External platform ratings are not scores for this individual recipe.
Trustpilot: 4.7/5 · 1,596 reviews
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
The score is 60 out of 100. Undeclared ingredient shares, meaning ingredients without printed percentages, contributed -10.6. The overall quality of the ingredient list contributed +7.5, and the processing format contributed -2.4. Being labelled nutritionally complete contributed +2.3.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.8 | 9.191 | +7.45 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 21.4% | -0.005 | -0.11 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 42.9% | -0.012 | -0.52 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.10 | 33.786 | +37.16 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | yes | -2.354 | -2.35 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.8 | 9.191 | +7.45 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.096 | +0.00 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.115 | +0.00 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.092 | +0.00 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 21.4% | -0.005 | -0.11 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.163 | +0.00 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 42.9% | -0.012 | -0.52 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.375 | +0.00 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.027 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 0.0% | -0.065 | +0.00 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 0 | -0.876 | +0.00 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 0.0% | 0.060 | +0.00 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | no | 0.707 | +0.00 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | 0.00 | 0.222 | +0.00 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.10 | 33.786 | +37.16 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | yes | -2.354 | -2.35 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- -1.74
- Additives declared on label
- +1 transparency bonus
- Subtotal
- 60.4
- Final score
- 60/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
Guaranteed-analysis FEDIAF score: crude minimums and maximums are bounds, not typical values; moisture (a maximum) uses the processing median where available; experimental US score.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 16.68 | 56 (band 22.9607250755287 to 40%) | 100 |
| Fat | 9 | 30.2 (band 7.015777106411546 to 20%) | 100 |
| Fibre | 2.27 | 7.6 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 100 |
| Energy (kcal/100g) | 152 | 510.2 | 100 |
Scored over 4 declared nutrients (combined weight 60); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score.
Declared fortification: 5 nutritional additives on the label
- Manganese
- Zinc
- Vitamin D
- Vitamin E
- Choline
Low confidence: partial analysis or moisture estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (voluntary) - not on file | 0/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) | 5/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared, Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
100/100 · moderate — 2 checkable claims: 2 consistent, 0 contradicted.
Consistent with the label
- "balanced, complete, and totally satisfying meal" — supported by the declared complete and balanced data.
- "Each recipe is thoughtfully formulated by our in-house pet nutritionist and crafted to meet your pet's daily nutritional needs. Plus, it follows the high standards set by FEDIAF" — supported by the declared complete and balanced data.
3 further claims on file that we cannot check against the label.
Moderate: every checkable claim is consistent with the declared label.
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| FEDIAF Gently Cooked meals are made with top-notch, carefully chosen ingredients that are gently cooked to lock in all the natural goodness and flavor (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Makes digestion easier—perfect for pets with sensitive stomachs (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| balanced, complete, and totally satisfying meal (on page) | Content | consistent | Manufacturer assertion |
| no artificial preservatives, colorings, or flavors (on page) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Each recipe is thoughtfully formulated by our in-house pet nutritionist and crafted to meet your pet's daily nutritional needs. Plus, it follows the high standards set by FEDIAF (on page) | Content | consistent | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Alternatives to Gently Cooked Lamb
Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.