Nom Nom Lamb Pilaf

Fresh Frozen complete

Average
our rating

Is Nom Nom Lamb Pilaf a good dog food?

We score it 56/100 (Average). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.

How we score

Why this score?

This recipe achieves a total score of 56 out of 100 based on several key factors. The presence of ingredients without printed percentages contributed -10.6 to the overall rating, while the overall quality of the ingredient list added +5.8. Furthermore, the additive load contributed -3.7, and the additives in the recipe adjusted the score by +2.7.

Only part of the analytical constituents are declared, so the nutritional picture is incomplete.

100% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.

The Recipe score measures how attractive and transparent the declared ingredient list is. It is not, by itself, proof that the food is nutritionally appropriate for long-term feeding. The Nutritional and Evidence scores measure what we can verify towards that stronger claim.

Why you might choose it

  • Single named animal protein: lamb.
  • A minimally processed format: kept frozen, not heat-treated.
  • Nutritionally complete: formulated to be fed as the whole diet.

Why you might not

  • Meat makes up an estimated 3% of the dry matter (8% as fed); carbohydrates dominate.
  • 100% of the recipe mass has no printed percentage, so the exact split cannot be verified.
  • Its additive load costs about 4 points in the rating.

View the source page

Estimated composition

supplement48.7%
additive13.9%
mineral8.2%
meat7.9%
veg7.6%
carb3.9%
other3.7%
unknown3.2%
oil2.9%

Typical analysis (as fed)

Protein
6%
Fat
4.50%
Fibre
4%
Moisture
75%
Carbohydrates
13%

Additives & feeding info

Nutritional additives

Zinc Gluconate; Iron Amino Acid Chelate; Vitamin E Supplement; Potassium Iodide; Vitamin B12 Supplement; Copper Gluconate; Manganese Gluconate; Selenium Amino Acid Chelate; Niacin (Vitamin B3); Thiamine Mononitrate (Vitamin B1); Pyridoxine Hydrochloride (Vitamin B6); Riboflavin (Vitamin B2); Folic Acid; Vitamin A Supplement; Cholecalciferol (Source of Vitamin D3); Calcium Pantothenate (Vitamin B5)

Storage

Store in the freezer immediately after unboxing for up to 6 months. Thaw meal packs in the fridge overnight. Once defrosted, food can be kept in the fridge for up to 5 days.

Feeding guide

Full meals: feed ½ cup daily per 10 lb of body weight. Toppers: feed ¼ cup daily per 10 lb. Personalized subscription instructions may vary by age, weight and activity. Transition over 7 days: 25% on days 1–2, 50% on days 3–4, 75% on days 5–6, and 100% from day 7.

Reviews

Trustpilot: 4.3/5 · 1,862 reviews

Who is this food for?

Suits

  • Labelled by the manufacturer for all lifestages
  • Single named protein: lamb
  • Doesn't list chicken, beef, turkey, fish, venison, pork, duck as ingredients

Consider something else if:

  • Your dog avoids grain: the label lists rice - brown / whole grain

These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Use the homepage filter to find foods that fit your dog.

Ingredients (33)

#As declaredMatchedCategoryTierDeclared %Est. %
1Ground LambLambmeatmedium-4.0
2Brown RiceRice - brown / whole graincarbmedium-3.9
3EggEggmeatgood-3.9
4CarrotsCarrotsveggood-3.8
5PeasPeasvegmedium-3.8
6Water Sufficient for ProcessingWaterother--3.7
7Dicalcium PhosphateDicalcium phosphatesupplementmedium-3.6
8Natural FlavorFlavoradditivepoor-3.6
9Citric AcidCitric Acidadditivemedium-3.5
10VinegarVinegaradditivemedium-3.5
11SaltSaltadditivemedium-3.4
12Calcium CarbonateCalcium Carbonatesupplementmedium-3.3
13Potassium ChloridePotassium Chloridesupplementmedium-3.3
14Choline BitartrateCholinesupplementgood-3.2
15Potassium Carbonateunmatched---3.2
16Dimagnesium PhosphatePhosphorussupplementgood-3.1
17Zinc GluconateZinc Oxidesupplementgood-3.0
18Iron Amino Acid ChelateIron Proteinatemineralgood-3.0
19Canola OilRapeseed oiloilgood-2.9
20Vitamin E SupplementVitamin Esupplementgood-2.8
21Potassium IodidePotassium iodidesupplementgood-2.8
22Vitamin B12 SupplementVitamin B12supplementgood-2.7
23Copper GluconateCoppermineralgood-2.7
24Manganese GluconateManganesesupplementgood-2.6
25Selenium Amino Acid ChelateSeleniummineralgood-2.5
26Niacin (Vitamin B3)Niacinsupplementgood-2.5
27Thiamine Mononitrate (Vitamin B1)Thiamine mononitratesupplementgood-2.4
28Pyridoxine Hydrochloride (Vitamin B6)Pyridoxine hydrochloridesupplementgood-2.4
29Riboflavin (Vitamin B2)Riboflavinsupplementgood-2.3
30Folic AcidFolic acidsupplementgood-2.2
31Vitamin A SupplementVitamin Asupplementgood-2.2
32Cholecalciferol (Source of Vitamin D3)Vitamin D3 supplementsupplementgood-2.1
33Calcium Pantothenate (Vitamin B5).Calcium pantothenatesupplementgood-2.1

Brand

Trust and provenance

Recall history
No recalls recorded in our database
Label data last checked
2026-09-14
Scored with
Model v3 (methodology)
Product page
www.nomnomnow.com

Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.

Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.

Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated

Scored with model v3 on 2026-09-26. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.

ComponentInputCoefficientContribution
Base score-30.909+30.91
Average ingredient quality0.69.191+5.83
Carb share of dry matter4.5%-0.115-0.52
Oil share of dry matter3.8%-0.092-0.35
Vegetable share of dry matter1.5%-0.005-0.01
Additive share of dry matter16.4%0.163+2.67
Supplement share of dry matter58.7%-0.012-0.72
Unrecognised share of dry matter2.1%-0.027-0.05
Recipe graded poor3.6%-0.065-0.23
Number of poor ingredients1-0.876-0.88
Largest single poor ingredient3.6%0.060+0.21
Undeclared quantities100.0%-0.106-10.56
Complete dietyes2.294+2.29
Low meat (under 10% of dry matter)yes-3.158-3.16
Additive penalty-16.800.222-3.73
Processing multiplier1.1033.786+37.16
Processing: Fresh Frozenyes-2.354-2.35
Show all 40 components
ComponentInputCoefficientContribution
Base score-30.909+30.91
Average ingredient quality0.69.191+5.83
Meat share of dry matter0.0%0.096+0.00
Carb share of dry matter4.5%-0.115-0.52
Oil share of dry matter3.8%-0.092-0.35
Vegetable share of dry matter1.5%-0.005-0.01
Additive share of dry matter16.4%0.163+2.67
Supplement share of dry matter58.7%-0.012-0.72
Other share of dry matter0.0%-0.375+0.00
Unrecognised share of dry matter2.1%-0.027-0.05
Recipe graded poor3.6%-0.065-0.23
Poor-quality meat in recipe0.0%-0.179+0.00
Number of poor ingredients1-0.876-0.88
Largest single poor ingredient3.6%0.060+0.21
Undeclared quantities100.0%-0.106-10.56
Prints ingredient percentagesno0.000+0.00
Complete dietyes2.294+2.29
Frozen or chilled freshno0.000+0.00
High meat (30%+ of dry matter)no0.707+0.00
Low meat (under 10% of dry matter)yes-3.158-3.16
High carb and low meatno-1.180+0.00
Meat share × printed percentages0.00.000+0.00
Meat share × fresh0.00.000+0.00
Fresh × high meat0.011.084+0.00
Additive penalty-16.800.222-3.73
Processing multiplier1.1033.786+37.16
Processing: Rawno-0.054+0.00
Processing: Fresh Chilledno-2.354+0.00
Processing: Fresh Frozenyes-2.354-2.35
Processing: Fresh Refrigeratedno0.000+0.00
Processing: Fresh Shelfno-0.672+0.00
Processing: Dry Freeze Driedno6.629+0.00
Processing: Dry Air Driedno6.331+0.00
Processing: Dry Cold Pressedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Bakedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Extrudedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Semi Moistno-6.174+0.00
Processing: Dry Mueslino-10.146+0.00
Processing: Wet Pateno-0.672+0.00
Processing: Wet Chunksno-0.672+0.00
Processing-type offset
-1.74
Additives declared on label
+1 transparency bonus
Subtotal
55.8
Final score
56/100

Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.

Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges

How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.

Guaranteed-analysis FEDIAF score: crude minimums and maximums are bounds, not typical values; moisture (a maximum) uses the processing median where available; experimental US score.

NutrientAs fed (label)Dry matter (scored)Score
Protein621.4 (band 18 to 40%)79.4
Fat4.516.1 (band 5.5 to 20%)100
Fibre414.3 (band 0.5 to 5%)100

Fibre: Declared as a maximum; the high-fibre taper is not applied.

Scored over 3 declared nutrients (combined weight 50); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score. Moisture was not declared and was estimated at 72% from the food type.

Low confidence: partial analysis or moisture estimated from the food type.

This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.

Transparency: what the label discloses

How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.

ItemPoints
✓ Ingredient list on the label (mandatory)10/10
✗ Printed percentages on the label (voluntary) - not on file0/20
✗ Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file0/15
✓ Additives declared (mandatory)5/10
✗ Energy value declared (voluntary) - not on file0/5
✓ Complete/complementary designation (mandatory)5/5
✓ Feeding guidance given (mandatory)10/10
✓ Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory)5/10
✓ Country of manufacture stated (voluntary)10/10
✗ Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file0/5

Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared, Batch and date labelling).

Safety: recall history

Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.

No recalls recorded in our database.

Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it

The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.

0/100 · limited — 1 checkable claim: 0 consistent, 1 contradicted.

Contradicted by the label

  • "Rich in fatty acids" — the declared label says otherwise on high fat.

9 further claims on file that we cannot check against the label.

Limited: at least one claim contradicts the declared label, or a recent upheld ASA ruling applies.

ClaimTypeCheckSubstantiation
A highly digestible protein (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Vet-developed for the complete and balanced nutrition dogs need. (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
formulated to meet the nutritional levels established by the AAFCO Dog Food Nutrient Profiles for All Life Stages including growth of large size dogs (70 lb. or more as an adult) (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
gently cooked dog food (on page)Contentnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Rich in fatty acids (on page)NutrientcontradictedManufacturer assertion
grain-inclusive diet (on page)Contentnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Contains beta-carotene (on page)Nutrientnot checkableManufacturer assertion
a tasty protein alternative to chicken and beef (on page)Contentnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Whole Food Ingredients (on page)Contentnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Packed with iron and zinc (on page)Nutrientnot checkableManufacturer assertion

The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.

Other products from Nom Nom

See all products from Nom Nom

Alternatives to Lamb Pilaf

Foods in our database that are similar on ingredients, protein, format or price. Scores and figures are from the same deterministic model used everywhere on the site.

See all alternatives

Community

Owners' verdict
0 votes

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.

Comments are reviewed before they appear.