Maev Beef
Fresh Frozen · complete
Our verdict
Is Maev Beef a good dog food?
We score it 52/100 (Average). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
100% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
- Grain-free: no grain ingredients listed
- Doesn't list chicken, turkey, lamb, venison, pork, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids beef: the label lists beef
- Your dog avoids fish: the label lists fish oil
- You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Ingredients (14)100% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- veg 48.8%
- meat 18.3%
- carb 8.6%
- unknown 6.6%
- additive 6.3%
- oil 6.0%
- supplement 5.3%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | USDA Beef | Beef | meat · medium | - | 9.3 |
| 2 | USDA Beef Liver | Liver | meat · good | - | 9.0 |
| 3 | Blanched Potato | Potatoes | carb · medium | - | 8.6 |
| 4 | Green Bean | Green Beans | veg · good | - | 8.3 |
| 5 | Zucchini | Courgette | veg · good | - | 8.0 |
| 6 | Kale | Kale | veg · good | - | 7.6 |
| 7 | Blueberry | Blueberries | veg · good | - | 7.3 |
| 8 | Peanut Butter | Peanut Butter | veg · medium | - | 7.0 |
| 9 | MaevMulti™ | unmatched | - | - | 6.6 |
| 10 | Salt | Salt | additive · poor | - | 6.3 |
| 11 | Fish Oil | Fish Oil | oil · good | - | 6.0 |
| 12 | Flaxseed | Linseed | veg · good | - | 5.6 |
| 13 | Probiotic Blend | Probiotic | supplement · good | - | 5.3 |
| 14 | Chicory Root. | Chicory root | veg · good | - | 5.0 |
- 1. USDA Beef9.3% estimated
- 2. USDA Beef Liver9.0% estimated
- 3. Blanched Potato8.6% estimated
- 4. Green Bean8.3% estimated
- 5. Zucchini8.0% estimated
- 6. Kale7.6% estimated
- 7. Blueberry7.3% estimated
- 8. Peanut Butter7.0% estimated
- 9. MaevMulti™6.6% estimated
- 10. Salt6.3% estimated
- 11. Fish Oil6.0% estimated
- 12. Flaxseed5.6% estimated
- 13. Probiotic Blend5.3% estimated
- 14. Chicory Root.5.0% estimated
Nutrition and feeding
Guaranteed analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed |
|---|---|
| Omega-6 fatty acids | 0.55% |
Energy: 110 kcal/100g
Additives & feeding info
Feeding and storage
Storage
Flash-frozen raw food, delivered frozen to the door. Serve frozen, thawed, or gently warmed (meetmaev.com/products/raw-food: 'Flash-frozen and delivered to your door', 'SERVE FROZEN, THAWED, OR GENTLY WARMED', 'Maev Whole Ingredient Food is flash-frozen to lock in essential vitamins, minerals, and proteins').
No additives recorded yet.
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-28
Brand and contact: Maev
- Website
- https://www.meetmaev.com/
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-28
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- www.meetmaev.com
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Brand and retailer reviews
External platform ratings are not scores for this individual recipe.
Trustpilot: 4.2/5 · 447 reviews
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
The overall score came out at 52 out of 100. Ingredients without printed percentages pulled the score down by -10.6 points, while the overall quality of the ingredient list added +5 and the additives in the recipe contributed +2.4. The processing format reduced the score by -2.4 points.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.5 | 9.191 | +4.96 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 5.6% | -0.115 | -0.64 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 15.3% | -0.092 | -1.41 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 29.9% | -0.005 | -0.15 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 14.7% | 0.163 | +2.39 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 12.7% | -0.012 | -0.15 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 8.6% | -0.027 | -0.23 |
| Recipe graded poor | 6.3% | -0.065 | -0.41 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 1 | -0.876 | -0.88 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 6.3% | 0.060 | +0.38 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| Additive penalty | -7.70 | 0.222 | -1.71 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.10 | 33.786 | +37.16 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | yes | -2.354 | -2.35 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.5 | 9.191 | +4.96 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.096 | +0.00 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 5.6% | -0.115 | -0.64 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 15.3% | -0.092 | -1.41 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 29.9% | -0.005 | -0.15 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 14.7% | 0.163 | +2.39 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 12.7% | -0.012 | -0.15 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.375 | +0.00 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 8.6% | -0.027 | -0.23 |
| Recipe graded poor | 6.3% | -0.065 | -0.41 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 1 | -0.876 | -0.88 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 6.3% | 0.060 | +0.38 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | no | 2.294 | +0.00 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | no | 0.707 | +0.00 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | -7.70 | 0.222 | -1.71 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.10 | 33.786 | +37.16 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | yes | -2.354 | -2.35 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- -1.74
- Subtotal
- 52.4
- Final score
- 52/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
Guaranteed-analysis FEDIAF score: crude minimums and maximums are bounds, not typical values; moisture (a maximum) uses the processing median where available; experimental US score.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Omega fatty acids (omega-6 and omega-3) | - | - | 100 |
| Energy (kcal/100g) | 110 | 392.9 | 100 |
Omega fatty acids (omega-6 and omega-3): scored as the mean of its declared components (omega-6 100). The FEDIAF minimum for omega-6 is linoleic acid specifically.
Scored over 2 declared nutrients (combined weight 20); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score. Moisture was not declared and was estimated at 72% from the food type.
No nutritional additives section declared on the label.
Low confidence: partial analysis or moisture estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (voluntary) - not on file | 0/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) | 5/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) - not on file | 0/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared, Additives declared, Feeding guidance given, Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
No on-pack claims on file: nothing to verify.
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Alternatives to Beef
Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.