Is A Pup Above Chicka Chicka Bow Wow a good dog food?
We score it 56/100 (Average). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
Why this score?
The product scored 56 out of 100. The meat content contributed +6.9 points to the overall quality of the ingredient list, while -10.6 points were lost due to ingredients without printed percentages, -3.5 points were deducted for the carbohydrate content, and -2.4 points were lost for the processing format.
Only part of the analytical constituents are declared, so the nutritional picture is incomplete.
100% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
- Recipe56
- Nutritionallow100
- Transparency50
- Safety100
- Evidencestrong100
The Recipe score measures how attractive and transparent the declared ingredient list is. It is not, by itself, proof that the food is nutritionally appropriate for long-term feeding. The Nutritional and Evidence scores measure what we can verify towards that stronger claim.
Why you might choose it
- Single named animal protein: chicken.
- A minimally processed format: kept frozen, not heat-treated.
- Declares energy content, which most labels omit.
Why you might not
- 100% of the recipe mass has no printed percentage, so the exact split cannot be verified.
- Needs freezer space and defrosting before serving.
Estimated composition
Typical analysis (as fed)
- Protein
- 12.80%
- Fat
- 5.20%
- Fibre
- 1.80%
- Moisture
- 69.20%
Energy: 138 kcal/100g
Additives & feeding info
Nutritional additives
Dicalcium Phosphate; Calcium Carbonate; Potassium Chloride; Sodium Bicarbonate; Magnesium Oxide; Zinc Amino Acid Chelate; Iron Amino Acid Chelate; Copper Amino Acid Chelate; Manganese Amino Acid Chelate; Potassium Iodide; Sodium Selenite; Vitamin D3; Vitamin E
Storage
Ships frozen with dry ice; store in freezer. Unopened vacuum-sealed patties good in the fridge for 14 days; once defrosted and open, good in the fridge for 5 to 7 days. Defrost and serve, no cooking required.
Feeding guide
Feed as a complete meal or a topper. 5 lbs = 1/4 patty/day; 10 lbs = 1/3; 15 lbs = 1/2; 20 lbs = 3/4; 30 lbs = 1; 40 lbs = 1 1/4; 50 lbs = 1 1/3; 60 lbs = 1 1/2; 70 lbs = 1 3/4; 80 lbs = 2. Divide into two servings per day. 1 patty = 1 lb of food.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
- Single named protein: chicken
- Doesn't list beef, turkey, lamb, fish, venison, pork, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids grain: the label lists rice - white
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Use the homepage filter to find foods that fit your dog.
Ingredients (12)
| # | As declared | Matched | Category | Tier | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Chicken | Chicken | meat | medium | - | 10.8 |
| 2 | chicken liver | Chicken Liver | meat | good | - | 10.4 |
| 3 | sweet potatoes | Sweet Potatoes | carb | good | - | 9.9 |
| 4 | chicken bone broth | Cooking broth | other | medium | - | 9.5 |
| 5 | rice | Rice - white | carb | medium | - | 9.0 |
| 6 | apples | Apples | veg | good | - | 8.6 |
| 7 | spinach | Spinach | veg | good | - | 8.1 |
| 8 | kale | Kale | veg | good | - | 7.7 |
| 9 | turmeric | Turmeric | veg | good | - | 7.2 |
| 10 | thyme | Thyme | veg | good | - | 6.8 |
| 11 | parsley | Parsley | veg | good | - | 6.3 |
| 12 | APA nutrient mix (Dicalcium Phosphate, Calcium Carbonate, Potassium Chloride, Sodium Bicarbonate, Magnesium Oxide, Zinc Amino Acid Chelate, Iron Amino Acid Chelate, Copper Amino Acid Chelate, Manganese Amino Acid Chelate, Potassium Iodide, Sodium Selenite, Vitamin D3, Vitamin E). | Dicalcium phosphate | supplement | medium | - | 5.9 |
Brand
- Website
- https://apupabove.com/
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-18
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- apupabove.com
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Scored with model v3 on 2026-09-26. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.8 | 9.191 | +6.92 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 30.3% | -0.115 | -3.49 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 35.3% | -0.005 | -0.18 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 15.7% | -0.012 | -0.19 |
| Other share of dry matter | 1.4% | -0.375 | -0.52 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.10 | 33.786 | +37.16 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | yes | -2.354 | -2.35 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.8 | 9.191 | +6.92 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.096 | +0.00 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 30.3% | -0.115 | -3.49 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.092 | +0.00 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 35.3% | -0.005 | -0.18 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.163 | +0.00 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 15.7% | -0.012 | -0.19 |
| Other share of dry matter | 1.4% | -0.375 | -0.52 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.027 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 0.0% | -0.065 | +0.00 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 0 | -0.876 | +0.00 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 0.0% | 0.060 | +0.00 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | no | 0.707 | +0.00 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | 0.00 | 0.222 | +0.00 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.10 | 33.786 | +37.16 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | yes | -2.354 | -2.35 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- -1.74
- Additives declared on label
- +1 transparency bonus
- Subtotal
- 56.1
- Final score
- 56/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
Guaranteed-analysis FEDIAF score: crude minimums and maximums are bounds, not typical values; moisture (a maximum) uses the processing median where available; experimental US score.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 12.8 | 41.6 (band 18 to 40%) | 100 |
| Fat | 5.2 | 16.9 (band 5.5 to 20%) | 100 |
| Fibre | 1.8 | 5.8 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 100 |
| Energy (kcal/100g) | 138 | 448.1 | 100 |
Scored over 4 declared nutrients (combined weight 60); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score.
Low confidence: partial analysis or moisture estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (voluntary) - not on file | 0/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) | 5/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared, Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
100/100 · strong — 3 checkable claims: 3 consistent, 0 contradicted.
Consistent with the label
- "90% animal protein" — supported by the declared high protein data.
- "Single source protein" — supported by the declared single protein data.
- "High protein: 10g protein per 100 kcal" — supported by the declared high protein data.
11 further claims on file that we cannot check against the label.
Strong: at least three checkable claims, all consistent with the declared label, and no compliance cap.
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cage-free chicken (on page) | provenance | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Superfoods turmeric, thyme, parsley for joint, immune, digestive support (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Clinically validated nutrition formulated by certified veterinary nutritionists to meet AAFCO standards (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Gently sous-vide cooked to eliminate pathogens and preserve nutrients (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Each batch tested for E. coli, listeria, and salmonella (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Grain friendly recipe (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| 90% animal protein (on page) | High/low level | consistent | Manufacturer assertion |
| 93% digestible (on page) | High/low level | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Non-GMO veggies (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Made in USDA-inspected, human-grade kitchens (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Single source protein (on page) | Content | consistent | Manufacturer assertion |
| Cage-free chicken without antibiotics or growth hormones (on page) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| 100% Human Grade Standards (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| High protein: 10g protein per 100 kcal (on page) | High/low level | consistent | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Other products from A Pup Above
See all products from A Pup Above
Alternatives to Chicka Chicka Bow Wow
Foods in our database that are similar on ingredients, protein, format or price. Scores and figures are from the same deterministic model used everywhere on the site.
Community
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.