Is Evermore Pet Food Chicken Recipe a good dog food?
We score it 57/100 (Average). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
Why this score?
The product scored 57 out of 100. The meat content contributed +7.7 points to the overall quality of the ingredient list, while -10.6 points were lost due to ingredients without printed percentages, -2.5 points were deducted for the carbohydrate content, and -2.4 points were lost for the processing format.
100% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
- Recipe57
- NutritionalNot recorded
- Transparency35
- Safety100
- EvidenceNot recorded
The Recipe score measures how attractive and transparent the declared ingredient list is. It is not, by itself, proof that the food is nutritionally appropriate for long-term feeding. The Nutritional and Evidence scores measure what we can verify towards that stronger claim.
Estimated composition
Typical analysis (as fed)
No analysis recorded yet.
Additives & feeding info
Nutritional additives
Zinc (as zinc gluconate)
Storage
Thaw in the fridge overnight. Store in a resealable container or keep leftovers in the pouch sealed with a clip. Opened, thawed food can be kept for up to one week in the fridge.
Reviews
Trustpilot: 0.0/5 · 0 reviews
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
- Doesn't list beef, turkey, lamb, venison, pork, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids chicken: the label lists chicken
- Your dog avoids fish: the label lists pollock oil
- Your dog avoids grain: the label lists oats
- You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Use the homepage filter to find foods that fit your dog.
Ingredients (19)
| # | As declared | Matched | Category | Tier | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Chicken | Chicken | meat | medium | - | 6.9 |
| 2 | chicken hearts | Chicken Heart | meat | good | - | 6.7 |
| 3 | chicken livers | Chicken Liver | meat | good | - | 6.5 |
| 4 | eggs | Egg | meat | good | - | 6.4 |
| 5 | organic sweet potatoes | Sweet Potatoes | carb | good | - | 6.2 |
| 6 | organic carrots | Carrots | veg | good | - | 6.0 |
| 7 | organic kale | Kale | veg | good | - | 5.8 |
| 8 | organic apples | Apples | veg | good | - | 5.6 |
| 9 | organic dandelion greens | Dandelion Leaves | veg | good | - | 5.4 |
| 10 | organic blueberries | Blueberries | veg | good | - | 5.3 |
| 11 | organic parsley | Parsley | veg | good | - | 5.1 |
| 12 | organic oats | Oats | carb | medium | - | 4.9 |
| 13 | organic barley | Barley | carb | medium | - | 4.7 |
| 14 | organic pumpkin seeds | Pumpkin Seeds | veg | good | - | 4.5 |
| 15 | organic safflower oil | Safflower Oil | oil | good | - | 4.4 |
| 16 | eggshell powder | Crushed Eggshells | supplement | good | - | 4.2 |
| 17 | pollock oil | Pollock Oil | oil | good | - | 4.0 |
| 18 | organic dried kelp | Kelp | veg | good | - | 3.8 |
| 19 | zinc gluconate. | Zinc Oxide | supplement | good | - | 3.6 |
Brand
- Website
- https://evermorepetfood.com/
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-10-06
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- evermorepetfood.com
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-06. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.8 | 9.191 | +7.67 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 22.1% | -0.115 | -2.54 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 18.2% | -0.092 | -1.68 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 27.5% | -0.005 | -0.14 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 15.8% | -0.012 | -0.19 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.10 | 33.786 | +37.16 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | yes | -2.354 | -2.35 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.8 | 9.191 | +7.67 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.096 | +0.00 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 22.1% | -0.115 | -2.54 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 18.2% | -0.092 | -1.68 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 27.5% | -0.005 | -0.14 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.163 | +0.00 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 15.8% | -0.012 | -0.19 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.375 | +0.00 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.027 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 0.0% | -0.065 | +0.00 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 0 | -0.876 | +0.00 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 0.0% | 0.060 | +0.00 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | no | 0.707 | +0.00 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | 0.00 | 0.222 | +0.00 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.10 | 33.786 | +37.16 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | yes | -2.354 | -2.35 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- -1.74
- Additives declared on label
- +1 transparency bonus
- Subtotal
- 56.7
- Final score
- 57/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
Analytical constituents not declared
Declared fortification: 1 nutritional additive on the label
- Zinc (as zinc gluconate)
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (voluntary) - not on file | 0/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) - not on file | 0/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) - not on file | 0/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared, Feeding guidance given, Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
Claims on file; none we can check against the label
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| ADULT MAINTENANCE (on pack) | Nutrient | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Transparently sourced from humane, quality ingredients (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| gently cooked food is highly digestible (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Heirloom, slow-growth chicken is humanely raised and fed a GMO-free Diet (GAP Step 4: Pasture-centric) (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Eggs are pasture-raised and Certified Humane (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Wild Alaskan red pollock oil is MSC-Certified (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| All produce is organic (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Other products from Evermore Pet Food
See all products from Evermore Pet Food
Alternatives to Chicken Recipe
Foods in our database that are similar on ingredients, protein, format or price. Scores and figures are from the same deterministic model used everywhere on the site.
Community
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.