Connolly's RED MILLS Adult Senior

Dry Extruded complete High meat

Adult Senior
Average
our rating

Is Connolly's RED MILLS Adult Senior a good dog food?

We score it 61/100 (Average). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.

How we score

Why this score?

This recipe achieves a total score of 61 out of 100 based on several key factors. The meat content contributed +2.7 points, and the overall quality of the ingredient list added +7.4 points. However, the processing format reduced the score by -6.7 points. Additionally, ingredients without printed percentages resulted in a deduction of -7.8 points.

74% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.

The Recipe score measures how attractive and transparent the declared ingredient list is. It is not, by itself, proof that the food is nutritionally appropriate for long-term feeding. The Nutritional and Evidence scores measure what we can verify towards that stronger claim.

Why you might choose it

  • Meat makes up an estimated 33% of the dry matter (30% as fed).
  • Single named animal protein: chicken.
  • Nutritionally complete: formulated to be fed as the whole diet.

Why you might not

  • 74% of the recipe mass has no printed percentage, so the exact split cannot be verified.

View the source page

Estimated composition

meat30.3%
veg26.9%
supplement18.1%
carb15.5%
oil5.1%
fibre4.0%

Typical analysis (as fed)

Protein
21%
Fat
10%
Fibre
2%
Ash
6%
Moisture
10%

Additives & feeding info

Nutritional additives

Vitamin A 24,000 iu/kg; Vitamin D3 2,000 iu/kg; Vitamin E (Alpha Tocopherol) 250 iu/kg; Copper Sulphate Pentahydrate 28.0 mg/kg; Sodium Selenite 0.3 mg/kg; Iron Sulphate Monohydrate 250.0 mg/kg; Manganese Oxide 65.0 mg/kg; Zinc Oxide 97.2 mg/kg; Zinc Chelate of Amino Acid Hydrate 200.0 mg/kg; Calcium Iodate Anhydrous 2.4 mg/kg

Technological additives

Antioxidants, Preservatives (Preserved with tocopherol-rich extracts of natural origin)

Storage

Store in a cool, dry place, away from direct sunlight.

Feeding guide

Body Weight -> Daily Amount: 6kg 105g*, 8kg 128g*, 10kg 152g, 12kg 173g, 14kg 197g, 16kg 218g, 18kg 237g, 20kg 252g, 22kg 274g, 24kg 294g, 26kg 308g, 28kg 323g, 30kg 342g (*Leader Adult Small Breed Senior recommended for dogs <10kg). Feed two meals per day; may be fed wet (1 part water to 2 parts feed, lukewarm) or dry; use within 30 minutes if fed wet. Adjust to individual needs; ensure fresh water available.

Who is this food for?

Suits

  • Labelled by the manufacturer for senior dogs
  • Labelling or feeding guide is aimed at small dogs
  • Single named protein: chicken
  • Doesn't list beef, turkey, lamb, fish, venison, pork, duck as ingredients

Consider something else if:

  • Your dog avoids grain: the label lists rice - brown / whole grain

These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Use the homepage filter to find foods that fit your dog.

Ingredients (19)

#As declaredMatchedCategoryTierDeclared %Est. %
1Dehydrated Chicken (26%)Dried chicken proteinmeatgood2626.0
2Brown RiceRice - brown / whole graincarbmedium-5.4
3White RiceRice - whitecarbmedium-5.2
4Chicken FatChicken Oil and Fatoilmedium-5.1
5Dehulled OatsOatscarbmedium-4.9
6Whole LinseedLinseedveggood-4.8
7MineralsVitamins and mineralssupplementmedium-4.6
8AlfalfaAlfalfaveggood-4.5
9Hydrolysed Liver ProteinLivermeatgood-4.3
10Yeast ExtractYeastsupplementgood-4.2
11Chicory InulinInulinfibregood-4.0
12Dried CranberriesCranberriesveggood-3.9
13Dried BeetrootBeetrootveggood-3.7
14RosemaryRosemaryveggood-3.6
15Glucosamine HydrochlorideGlucosaminesupplementgood-3.4
16GingerGingerveggood-3.3
17TurmericTurmericveggood-3.1
18Chondroitin SulphateChondroitinsupplementgood-3.0
19Yucca schidigera.Yucca Schidigerasupplementgood-2.8

Brand

Connolly's RED MILLS

Phone
+353 (0)599775800
Address
Goresbridge, Co. Kilkenny, R95 EKH4

Trust and provenance

Recall history
No recalls recorded in our database
Label data last checked
2026-09-17
Scored with
Model v3 (methodology)

Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.

Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.

Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated

Scored with model v3 on 2026-09-26. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.

ComponentInputCoefficientContribution
Base score-30.909+30.91
Average ingredient quality0.89.191+7.35
Meat share of dry matter28.1%0.096+2.70
Carb share of dry matter16.1%-0.115-1.85
Oil share of dry matter5.9%-0.092-0.54
Vegetable share of dry matter21.4%-0.005-0.11
Supplement share of dry matter19.6%-0.012-0.24
Undeclared quantities74.0%-0.106-7.81
Complete dietyes2.294+2.29
Processing multiplier0.9833.786+33.11
Processing: Dry Extrudedyes-6.713-6.71
Show all 40 components
ComponentInputCoefficientContribution
Base score-30.909+30.91
Average ingredient quality0.89.191+7.35
Meat share of dry matter28.1%0.096+2.70
Carb share of dry matter16.1%-0.115-1.85
Oil share of dry matter5.9%-0.092-0.54
Vegetable share of dry matter21.4%-0.005-0.11
Additive share of dry matter0.0%0.163+0.00
Supplement share of dry matter19.6%-0.012-0.24
Other share of dry matter0.0%-0.375+0.00
Unrecognised share of dry matter0.0%-0.027+0.00
Recipe graded poor0.0%-0.065+0.00
Poor-quality meat in recipe0.0%-0.179+0.00
Number of poor ingredients0-0.876+0.00
Largest single poor ingredient0.0%0.060+0.00
Undeclared quantities74.0%-0.106-7.81
Prints ingredient percentagesno0.000+0.00
Complete dietyes2.294+2.29
Frozen or chilled freshno0.000+0.00
High meat (30%+ of dry matter)no0.707+0.00
Low meat (under 10% of dry matter)no-3.158+0.00
High carb and low meatno-1.180+0.00
Meat share × printed percentages0.00.000+0.00
Meat share × fresh0.00.000+0.00
Fresh × high meat0.011.084+0.00
Additive penalty0.000.222+0.00
Processing multiplier0.9833.786+33.11
Processing: Rawno-0.054+0.00
Processing: Fresh Chilledno-2.354+0.00
Processing: Fresh Frozenno-2.354+0.00
Processing: Fresh Refrigeratedno0.000+0.00
Processing: Fresh Shelfno-0.672+0.00
Processing: Dry Freeze Driedno6.629+0.00
Processing: Dry Air Driedno6.331+0.00
Processing: Dry Cold Pressedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Bakedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Extrudedyes-6.713-6.71
Processing: Dry Semi Moistno-6.174+0.00
Processing: Dry Mueslino-10.146+0.00
Processing: Wet Pateno-0.672+0.00
Processing: Wet Chunksno-0.672+0.00
Processing-type offset
+0.02
Additives declared on label
+2 transparency bonus
Subtotal
61.1
Final score
61/100

Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.

Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges

How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.

Guaranteed-analysis FEDIAF score: crude minimums and maximums are bounds, not typical values; moisture (a maximum) uses the processing median where available; experimental US score.

NutrientAs fed (label)Dry matter (scored)Score
Protein2123.2 (band 18 to 40%)84.2
Fat1011 (band 5.5 to 20%)93
Fibre22.2 (band 0.5 to 5%)92.8

Scored over 3 declared nutrients (combined weight 50); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score. Moisture was not declared and was estimated at 9.5% from the food type.

Low confidence: partial analysis or moisture estimated from the food type.

This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.

Transparency: what the label discloses

How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.

ItemPoints
✓ Ingredient list on the label (mandatory)10/10
✓ Printed percentages on the label (26% of the recipe mass) (voluntary)5.2/20
✓ Analytical constituents declared (mandatory)15/15
✓ Additives declared (mandatory)10/10
✗ Energy value declared (voluntary) - not on file0/5
✓ Complete/complementary designation (mandatory)5/5
✓ Feeding guidance given (mandatory)10/10
✓ Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory)10/10
✓ Country of manufacture stated (voluntary)10/10
✗ Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file0/5

Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Batch and date labelling).

Safety: recall history

Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.

No recalls recorded in our database.

Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it

The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.

Claims on file; none we can check against the label

ClaimTypeCheckSubstantiation
Designed to foster healthy aging (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Joint support (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Supports good motility in the digestive tract (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Strong Immune System (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Larger Kibble Size (on page)Contentnot checkableManufacturer assertion
A Taste Your Dog Loves (on page)Contentnot checkableManufacturer assertion
100% natural (on page)Contentnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Blended with botanicals (on page)Contentnot checkableManufacturer assertion
More glucosamine and chondroitin to support the joints (on page)Nutrientnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Chicken number one ingredient (on page)Contentnot checkableManufacturer assertion

The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.

Other products from Connolly's RED MILLS

See all products from Connolly's RED MILLS

Alternatives to Adult Senior

Foods in our database that are similar on ingredients, protein, format or price. Scores and figures are from the same deterministic model used everywhere on the site.

See all alternatives

Community

Owners' verdict
0 votes

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.

Comments are reviewed before they appear.