Vet-Concept Dog Low Carb
Dry Extruded · completeClear label
Our verdict
Is Vet-Concept Dog Low Carb a good dog food?
We score it 38/100 (Poor). The main reasons are set out in "Why you might not" below, and every step of the calculation is shown under "How we calculated this score".
Only part of the analytical constituents are declared, so the nutritional picture is incomplete.
100% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
- Doesn't list beef, venison, pork, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids chicken: it is listed as an ingredient
- Your dog avoids turkey: it is listed as an ingredient
- Your dog avoids lamb: it is listed as an ingredient
- Your dog avoids fish: the label lists fish and fish derivatives
- Your dog avoids grain: the label lists cereals
- You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Ingredients (15)100% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- veg 26.1%
- meat 25.3%
- fibre 18.0%
- supplement 12.8%
- carb 9.6%
- oil 8.1%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Meat and Animal Derivatives (Poultry Meal, Lamb Meal) | Meat and Animal Derivatives | meat · poor | - | 9.3 |
| 2 | Cereals (Barley) | Cereals | carb · poor | - | 9.0 |
| 3 | Cellulose | Cellulose | fibre · medium | - | 8.6 |
| 4 | Beet Pulp | Beet Pulp | fibre · medium | - | 8.3 |
| 5 | Fish and Fish Derivatives (Sea Fish Meal) | Fish and fish derivatives | meat · poor | - | 8.0 |
| 6 | Oils and Fats | Oils and Fats | oil · poor | - | 7.6 |
| 7 | Vegetables (Carrots) | Carrots | veg · good | - | 7.3 |
| 8 | Seeds (Linseed) | Seeds | veg · poor | - | 7.0 |
| 9 | Eggs and Egg Derivatives (Whole Egg Powder) | Egg | meat · good | - | 6.6 |
| 10 | Minerals | Vitamins and minerals | supplement · medium | - | 6.3 |
| 11 | Yeast | Yeast | supplement · good | - | 6.0 |
| 12 | Algae (Ascophyllum nodosum) | Seaweed | veg · good | - | 5.6 |
| 13 | Herbs | Herbs | veg · medium | - | 5.3 |
| 14 | Extracted Yeast | Yeast | supplement · good | - | 5.0 |
| 15 | Green-Lipped Mussel (Perna canaliculus) (0.05%) | Green-Lipped Mussel | supplement · good | 0.05 | 0.05 |
- 1. Meat and Animal Derivatives (Poultry Meal, Lamb Meal)9.3% estimated
- 2. Cereals (Barley)9.0% estimated
- 3. Cellulose8.6% estimated
- 4. Beet Pulp8.3% estimated
- 5. Fish and Fish Derivatives (Sea Fish Meal)8.0% estimated
- 6. Oils and Fats7.6% estimated
- 7. Vegetables (Carrots)7.3% estimated
- 8. Seeds (Linseed)7.0% estimated
- 9. Eggs and Egg Derivatives (Whole Egg Powder)6.6% estimated
- 10. Minerals6.3% estimated
- 11. Yeast6.0% estimated
- 12. Algae (Ascophyllum nodosum)5.6% estimated
- 13. Herbs5.3% estimated
- 14. Extracted Yeast5.0% estimated
- 15. Green-Lipped Mussel (Perna canaliculus) (0.05%)0.05% declared0.05% estimated
Nutrition and feedingProtein 25.60% · Fat 11.60%
Typical analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed |
|---|---|
| Protein | 25.60% |
| Fat | 11.60% |
| Fibre | 7.50% |
| Ash | 6.50% |
| Omega-3 fatty acids | 0.45% |
| Calcium | 1.20% |
| Phosphorus | 0.85% |
| Sodium | 0.30% |
Additives & feeding info
Feeding and storage
Feeding guide
Diät-Alleinfuttermittel für adulte Hunde; zunächst bis zu 6 Monaten. Fütterung in konstanter Menge und gleichbleibender Zusammensetzung; Frequenz abhängig vom Insulinpräparat und tierärztlichen Behandlungsplan, in der Regel zweimal täglich. Wasser zur freien Aufnahme anbieten. Vor Verwendung und vor Verlängerung der Fütterungsdauer den Rat eines Tierarztes einholen.
Additives declared on the label
Nutritional additives
Vitamin A 12.000 IE; Vitamin D3 1.200 IE; Vitamin E (all rac-alpha-Tocopherylacetat) 120 mg; Taurin 1.000 mg; L-Carnitin 500 mg; Eisen (Eisen(II)-sulfat-Monohydrat) 90 mg; Zink (Zinkoxid, Aminosäuren-Zinkchelat, Hydrat) 100 mg; Kupfer (Kupfer(II)-sulfat-Pentahydrat) 10 mg; Mangan (Mangan(II)-oxid) 15 mg; Jod (Kalziumjodat, wasserfrei) 2 mg
Technological additives
Citronensäure 200 mg; Antioxidationsmittel natürlichen Ursprungs
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-19
Brand and contact: Vet-Concept
- Contact page
- www.vet-concept.com
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-19
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- www.vet-concept.com
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Brand and retailer reviews
External platform ratings are not scores for this individual recipe.
Trustpilot: 0.0/5 · 0 reviews
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
The overall score was 38 out of 100. Ingredients without printed percentages reduced the score by -10.5, while the processing format deducted a further -6.7. Lower-quality meat ingredients brought it down by -3.3, and lower-quality ingredients lowered the score by -2.3.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.2 | 9.191 | +1.81 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 12.1% | -0.115 | -1.39 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 11.5% | -0.092 | -1.05 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 19.7% | -0.005 | -0.10 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 16.9% | -0.012 | -0.21 |
| Recipe graded poor | 36.1% | -0.065 | -2.35 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 18.4% | -0.179 | -3.29 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 4 | -0.876 | -3.50 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 10.0% | 0.060 | +0.60 |
| Undeclared quantities | 99.8% | -0.106 | -10.54 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| Additive penalty | -0.80 | 0.222 | -0.18 |
| Processing multiplier | 0.98 | 33.786 | +33.11 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.2 | 9.191 | +1.81 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.096 | +0.00 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 12.1% | -0.115 | -1.39 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 11.5% | -0.092 | -1.05 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 19.7% | -0.005 | -0.10 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.163 | +0.00 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 16.9% | -0.012 | -0.21 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.375 | +0.00 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.027 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 36.1% | -0.065 | -2.35 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 18.4% | -0.179 | -3.29 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 4 | -0.876 | -3.50 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 10.0% | 0.060 | +0.60 |
| Undeclared quantities | 99.8% | -0.106 | -10.54 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | no | 0.707 | +0.00 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | -0.80 | 0.222 | -0.18 |
| Processing multiplier | 0.98 | 33.786 | +33.11 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- +0.02
- Additives declared on label
- +2 transparency bonus
- Subtotal
- 38.2
- Final score
- 38/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 25.6 | 28.3 (band 18 to 40%) | 98.1 |
| Fat | 11.6 | 12.8 (band 5.5 to 20%) | 100 |
| Fibre | 7.5 | 8.3 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 96.4 |
| Calcium | 1.2 | 1.3 (band 0.5 to 2.5%) | 94.8 |
| Phosphorus | 0.85 | 0.9 (band 0.4 to 1.6%) | 97 |
| Sodium | 0.3 | 0.3 (band 0.1+%) | 100 |
| Calcium:phosphorus ratio | 1.4 | 1.4 (band 1 to 2%) | 94.7 |
Scored over 7 declared nutrients (combined weight 85); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score. Moisture was not declared and was estimated at 9.5% from the food type.
Declared fortification: 10 nutritional additives on the label
- Vitamin A 12.000 IE
- Vitamin D3 1.200 IE
- Vitamin E (all rac-alpha-Tocopherylacetat) 120 mg
- Taurin 1.000 mg
- L-Carnitin 500 mg
- Eisen (Eisen(II)-sulfat-Monohydrat) 90 mg
- Zink (Zinkoxid, Aminosäuren-Zinkchelat, Hydrat) 100 mg
- Kupfer (Kupfer(II)-sulfat-Pentahydrat) 10 mg
- Mangan (Mangan(II)-oxid) 15 mg
- Jod (Kalziumjodat, wasserfrei) 2 mg
Low confidence: partial analysis or moisture estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (voluntary) - not on file | 0/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) - not on file | 0/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared, Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
Claims on file; none we can check against the label
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Keine Tierversuche (on page) | provenance | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Kohlenhydratreduzierte Ernährung, z. B. bei Diabetes mellitus (on pack) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| zur Regulierung der Glucoseversorgung bei Diabetes mellitus (on pack) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| mit niedrigem Mono- und Disaccharidgehalt (on pack) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Frei von gentechnisch manipulierten Zutaten und chem. Konservierungsstoffen (on page) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Keine Geruchs-, Farb- oder Geschmacksstoffe (on page) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Nach Lebensmittelkriterien ausgewählte Fisch- und Fleischmaterialien (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Mit erhöhtem Faserstoffgehalt (on pack) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Alternatives to Dog Low Carb
Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.