Vet-Concept Basic Plain
Dry Extruded complete Clear label
Is Vet-Concept Basic Plain a good dog food?
We score it 34/100 (Poor). The main reasons are set out in "Why you might not" below, and every step of the calculation is shown under "How we calculated this score".
Why this score?
This recipe achieves a total score of 34 out of 100 based on our evaluation. Ingredients without printed percentages contributed -10.5 points to the overall assessment, while the processing format added -6.7 points. Furthermore, the remaining ingredients accounted for -3.9 points and the carbohydrate content contributed -2.8 points.
Only part of the analytical constituents are declared, so the nutritional picture is incomplete.
100% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
- Recipe34
- Nutritionalmedium95
- Transparency40
- Safety100
- EvidenceNot recorded
The Recipe score measures how attractive and transparent the declared ingredient list is. It is not, by itself, proof that the food is nutritionally appropriate for long-term feeding. The Nutritional and Evidence scores measure what we can verify towards that stronger claim.
Why you might choose it
- Prints ingredient percentages on the label.
- Single named animal protein: fish.
- Low in fat for its format: 9% fat on a dry-matter basis.
Why you might not
- 2 poor-graded ingredients make up about 28% of the recipe.
- Around 46% of the recipe is generic or unspecified ingredients.
- Meat makes up an estimated 0% of the dry matter; carbohydrates dominate.
Estimated composition
Typical analysis (as fed)
- Protein
- 23.20%
- Fat
- 9.20%
- Fibre
- 2.50%
- Ash
- 6.90%
- Omega-3 fatty acids
- 0.30%
- Omega-6 fatty acids
- 2%
- Calcium
- 1.25%
- Phosphorus
- 0.95%
- Sodium
- 0.30%
Energy: 352 kcal/100g
Additives & feeding info
Nutritional additives
Vitamin A 12.000 IE; Vitamin D3 1.200 IE; Vitamin E (all rac-alpha-Tocopherylacetat) 120 mg; Eisen (Eisen(II)-sulfat-Monohydrat) 90 mg; Zink (Zinkoxid, Aminosäuren-Zinkchelat, Hydrat) 100 mg; Kupfer (Kupfer(II)-sulfat-Pentahydrat) 10 mg
Reviews
Trustpilot: 0.0/5 · 0 reviews
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
- Single named protein: fish
- Doesn't list chicken, beef, turkey, lamb, venison, pork, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids grain: the label lists cereals
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Use the homepage filter to find foods that fit your dog.
Ingredients (10)
| # | As declared | Matched | Category | Tier | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Getreide (Mais, Weizen) | Cereals | carb | poor | - | 16.0 |
| 2 | Fleisch und tierische Nebenerzeugnisse (Geflügelfleischmehl) | unmatched | - | - | - | 15.0 |
| 3 | Fisch und Fischnebenerzeugnisse (Seefischmehl) | unmatched | - | - | - | 14.0 |
| 4 | Öle und Fette | unmatched | - | - | - | 13.0 |
| 5 | pflanzliche Nebenerzeugnisse (Rübentrockenschnitzel) | Vegetable By-Products | other | poor | - | 12.0 |
| 6 | Gemüse (Karotten*) | unmatched | - | - | - | 11.0 |
| 7 | Minerals toffe | Vitamins and minerals | supplement | medium | - | 10.0 |
| 8 | Kräuter* | Herbs | veg | medium | - | 9.0 |
| 9 | Hefe extrahiert* (Quelle für MOS)(0.1%) | unmatched | - | - | 0.1 | 0.1 |
| 10 | Grünlippmuschel* (Perna canaliculus)(0.05%) | Green-Lipped Mussel | supplement | good | 0.05 | 0.05 |
Brand
- Contact page
- www.vet-concept.com
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-19
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- www.vet-concept.com
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Scored with model v3 on 2026-09-26. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | -0.3 | 9.191 | -2.37 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 24.6% | -0.115 | -2.83 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 2.4% | -0.005 | -0.01 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 16.2% | -0.012 | -0.20 |
| Other share of dry matter | 10.5% | -0.375 | -3.93 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 46.4% | -0.027 | -1.23 |
| Recipe graded poor | 28.0% | -0.065 | -1.82 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 2 | -0.876 | -1.75 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 16.0% | 0.060 | +0.96 |
| Undeclared quantities | 99.8% | -0.106 | -10.54 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| Processing multiplier | 0.98 | 33.786 | +33.11 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | -0.3 | 9.191 | -2.37 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.096 | +0.00 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 24.6% | -0.115 | -2.83 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.092 | +0.00 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 2.4% | -0.005 | -0.01 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.163 | +0.00 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 16.2% | -0.012 | -0.20 |
| Other share of dry matter | 10.5% | -0.375 | -3.93 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 46.4% | -0.027 | -1.23 |
| Recipe graded poor | 28.0% | -0.065 | -1.82 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 2 | -0.876 | -1.75 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 16.0% | 0.060 | +0.96 |
| Undeclared quantities | 99.8% | -0.106 | -10.54 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | no | 0.707 | +0.00 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | 0.00 | 0.222 | +0.00 |
| Processing multiplier | 0.98 | 33.786 | +33.11 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- +0.02
- Additives declared on label
- +1 transparency bonus
- Subtotal
- 33.7
- Final score
- 34/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 23.2 | 25.6 (band 18 to 40%) | 90.8 |
| Fat | 9.2 | 10.2 (band 5.5 to 20%) | 89.3 |
| Fibre | 2.5 | 2.8 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 100 |
| Calcium | 1.25 | 1.4 (band 0.5 to 2.5%) | 96.4 |
| Phosphorus | 0.95 | 1 (band 0.4 to 1.6%) | 100 |
| Calcium:phosphorus ratio | 1.3 | 1.3 (band 1 to 2%) | 88.9 |
| Omega fatty acids (omega-6 and omega-3) | - | - | 100 |
| Energy (kcal/100g) | 352 | 389 | 100 |
Omega fatty acids (omega-6 and omega-3): scored as the mean of its declared components (omega-6 100). The FEDIAF minimum for omega-6 is linoleic acid specifically.
Scored over 8 declared nutrients (combined weight 100); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score. Moisture was not declared and was estimated at 9.5% from the food type.
Medium confidence: the full five-part analysis is on file; where moisture was not declared it was estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (voluntary) - not on file | 0/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) | 5/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) - not on file | 0/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared, Feeding guidance given, Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
Claims on file; none we can check against the label
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Leicht reduzierter Fettgehalt, um Übergewicht vorzubeugen (on pack) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Die mittelgroße Krokette fördert durch Form und Struktur die Kautätigkeit und den Zahnpflege-Effekt (on pack) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| BASIC PLAIN ist auch zur restriktiven Fütterung, z. B. nach Kastration, zu empfehlen (on pack) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Alleinfuttermittel für adulte Hunde (on pack) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Mit MOS & Neuseeländischer Grünlippmuschel (on pack) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Schmackhafte Vollwertnahrung mit Geflügel & Seefisch (on pack) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Other products from Vet-Concept
See all products from Vet-Concept
Alternatives to Basic Plain
Foods in our database that are similar on ingredients, protein, format or price. Scores and figures are from the same deterministic model used everywhere on the site.
Community
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.