Manufaktur für gesundes Hundefutter Premium Trockenfutter Sensitive Mono vom Pferd
Dry Extruded · completeClear label
Our verdict
Is Manufaktur für gesundes Hundefutter Premium Trockenfutter Sensitive Mono vom Pferd a good dog food?
We score it 57/100 (Average). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
62% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for all lifestages
- Grain-free: no grain ingredients listed
- Doesn't list chicken, beef, turkey, lamb, venison, pork, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids fish: the label lists crustaceans
- You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Ingredients (11)62% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- supplement 62.9%
- meat 24.0%
- unknown 12.1%
- veg 1.0%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 24% Fresh Horse | Horse | meat · good | 24 | 24.0 |
| 2 | 12% Horse Protein Dried | Horse | meat · good | 12 | 12.0 |
| 3 | 0.4% Fructooligosaccharides | Fructo-oligosaccharides | supplement · good | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| 4 | 0.1% Yucca schidigera | Yucca Schidigera | supplement · good | 0.1 | 0.1 |
| 5 | Seeds | Seeds | veg · poor | - | 19.2 |
| 6 | 1.0% Linseed | Linseed | veg · good | 1 | 1.0 |
| 7 | Minerals | Vitamins and minerals | supplement · medium | - | 16.8 |
| 8 | Molluscs and Crustaceans | Crustaceans | meat · good | - | 14.4 |
| 9 | 0.12% New Zealand Green-Lipped Mussel Powder | Green-Lipped Mussel | supplement · good | 0.12 | 0.1 |
| 10 | Yeasts | Yeast | supplement · good | - | 12.0 |
| 11 | 0.1% Mannanoligosaccharides | Mannanoligosaccharides | supplement · good | 0.1 | 0.1 |
- 1. 24% Fresh Horse24% declared24.0% estimated
- 2. 12% Horse Protein Dried12% declared12.0% estimated
- 3. 0.4% Fructooligosaccharides0.4% declared0.4% estimated
- 4. 0.1% Yucca schidigera0.1% declared0.1% estimated
- 5. Seeds19.2% estimated
- 6. 1.0% Linseed1% declared1.0% estimated
- 7. Minerals16.8% estimated
- 8. Molluscs and Crustaceans14.4% estimated
- 9. 0.12% New Zealand Green-Lipped Mussel Powder0.12% declared0.1% estimated
- 10. Yeasts12.0% estimated
- 11. 0.1% Mannanoligosaccharides0.1% declared0.1% estimated
Nutrition and feedingProtein 22% · Fat 16%
Typical analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed |
|---|---|
| Protein | 22% |
| Fat | 16% |
| Fibre | 3.50% |
| Ash | 9.90% |
| Moisture | 10% |
| Calcium | 1.50% |
| Phosphorus | 1% |
Energy: 365 kcal/100g
Additives & feeding info
Feeding and storage
Storage
Angebrochene Säcke trocken und kühl lagern. Charge und Mindesthaltbarkeit siehe Bodenetikett.
Feeding guide
2–3.5% des Körpergewichts täglich; z.B. 2kg ca. 40–70g, 10kg ca. 200–350g, 20kg ca. 400–700g, 30kg ca. 600–1050g. Empfehlung 1–2 Esslöffel Gelee beimischen.
Additives declared on the label
Nutritional additives
Vitamin A 20.000 IE/kg; Vitamin D3 1500 IE/kg; Vitamin E 200 mg/kg; 3b405 Kupfer 6 mg/kg; 3b502 Mangan 7.5 mg/kg; 3b603 Zink 75 mg/kg; 3b202 Jod 1.9 mg/kg; Taurin 1000 mg/kg
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-19
Brand and contact: Manufaktur für gesundes Hundefutter
- Website
- https://fordogsonly.de/
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-19
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- fordogsonly.de
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Brand and retailer reviews
External platform ratings are not scores for this individual recipe.
Trustpilot: 5.0/5 · 63 reviews
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
The overall score reached 57 out of 100. The processing format contributed -6.7 points, and ingredients without printed percentages cost a further -6.6 points. On the positive side, the overall quality of the ingredient list added +6.1 points, with being labelled nutritionally complete contributing +2.3.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.7 | 9.191 | +6.14 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 9.4% | 0.096 | +0.90 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 1.3% | -0.005 | -0.01 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 80.9% | -0.012 | -0.99 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 8.5% | -0.027 | -0.22 |
| Undeclared quantities | 62.3% | -0.106 | -6.58 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| Processing multiplier | 0.98 | 33.786 | +33.11 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.7 | 9.191 | +6.14 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 9.4% | 0.096 | +0.90 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.115 | +0.00 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.092 | +0.00 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 1.3% | -0.005 | -0.01 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.163 | +0.00 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 80.9% | -0.012 | -0.99 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.375 | +0.00 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 8.5% | -0.027 | -0.22 |
| Recipe graded poor | 0.0% | -0.065 | +0.00 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 0 | -0.876 | +0.00 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 0.0% | 0.060 | +0.00 |
| Undeclared quantities | 62.3% | -0.106 | -6.58 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | no | 0.707 | +0.00 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | 0.00 | 0.222 | +0.00 |
| Processing multiplier | 0.98 | 33.786 | +33.11 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- +0.02
- Additives declared on label
- +1 transparency bonus
- Subtotal
- 56.7
- Final score
- 57/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 22 | 24.4 (band 18.250000000000004 to 40%) | 87.1 |
| Fat | 16 | 17.8 (band 5.57638888888889 to 20%) | 100 |
| Fibre | 3.5 | 3.9 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 100 |
| Calcium | 1.5 | 1.7 (band 0.5069444444444445 to 2.5%) | 100 |
| Phosphorus | 1 | 1.1 (band 0.40555555555555567 to 1.6%) | 100 |
| Calcium:phosphorus ratio | 1.5 | 1.5 (band 1 to 2%) | 100 |
| Energy (kcal/100g) | 365 | 405.6 | 100 |
Scored over 7 declared nutrients (combined weight 90); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score.
Declared fortification: 8 nutritional additives on the label
- Vitamin A 20.000 IE/kg
- Vitamin D3 1500 IE/kg
- Vitamin E 200 mg/kg
- 3b405 Kupfer 6 mg/kg
- 3b502 Mangan 7.5 mg/kg
- 3b603 Zink 75 mg/kg
- 3b202 Jod 1.9 mg/kg
- Taurin 1000 mg/kg
High confidence: full analysis plus minerals or omegas and declared energy.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (37.7% of the recipe mass) (voluntary) | 7.5/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) | 15/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) | 5/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) | 5/5 |
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
100/100 · moderate — 2 checkable claims: 2 consistent, 0 contradicted.
Consistent with the label
- "Alleinfuttermittel für Hunde" — supported by the declared complete and balanced data.
- "Ohne Zusatz von Getreide, Soja, Milchprodukten, künstlichen Farb-, Duft-, Lock- und Konservierungsstoffen" — supported by the declared grain-free data.
5 further claims on file that we cannot check against the label.
Moderate: every checkable claim is consistent with the declared label.
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| auch für sensible Hunde und Allergiker besonders gut geeignet (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| regelmäßig in zertifizierten Instituten auf Qualität geprüft (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Alleinfuttermittel für Hunde (on pack) | Content | consistent | Manufacturer assertion |
| Ohne Tierversuche (on page) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| natürliche Zusammensetzung aller Vitamine, Mineralien und Spurenelemente, ohne tierische Nebenprodukte (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Ohne Zusatz von Getreide, Soja, Milchprodukten, künstlichen Farb-, Duft-, Lock- und Konservierungsstoffen (on page) | Free-from | consistent | Manufacturer assertion |
| Für Junior-, Adult- und Senior-Hunde geeignet (on pack) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Alternatives to Premium Trockenfutter Sensitive Mono vom Pferd
Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.