Tales & Tails Das hab ich mir PferDient - Senior
Dry Extruded · completeHigh meat
Our verdict
Is Tales & Tails Das hab ich mir PferDient - Senior a good dog food?
We score it 59/100 (Average). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
51% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for senior dogs
- Grain-free: no grain ingredients listed
- Doesn't list chicken, beef, turkey, lamb, venison, pork, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids fish: the label lists green-lipped mussel
- You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Ingredients (9)51% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- meat 49.0%
- veg 14.8%
- supplement 10.2%
- carb 8.2%
- oil 6.6%
- other 6.1%
- fibre 5.1%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5.5% Horse | Horse | meat · good | 5.5 | 5.5 |
| 2 | Tapioca | Tapioca | carb · medium | - | 15.1 |
| 3 | Parsnip | Parsnips | veg · good | - | 14.2 |
| 4 | Lentils | Lentils | veg · medium | - | 13.2 |
| 5 | Hemp Oil | Hemp Oil | oil · good | - | 12.3 |
| 6 | Protein Hydrolysate (vegetarian) | Protein Hydrolysate | other · poor | - | 11.3 |
| 7 | Minerals | Vitamins and minerals | supplement · medium | - | 10.4 |
| 8 | Psyllium Husks | Psyllium | fibre · good | - | 9.4 |
| 9 | Green-Lipped Mussel | Green-Lipped Mussel | supplement · good | - | 8.5 |
- 1. 5.5% Horse5.5% declared5.5% estimated
- 2. Tapioca15.1% estimated
- 3. Parsnip14.2% estimated
- 4. Lentils13.2% estimated
- 5. Hemp Oil12.3% estimated
- 6. Protein Hydrolysate (vegetarian)11.3% estimated
- 7. Minerals10.4% estimated
- 8. Psyllium Husks9.4% estimated
- 9. Green-Lipped Mussel8.5% estimated
Nutrition and feedingProtein 18.50% · Fat 13%
Typical analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed |
|---|---|
| Protein | 18.50% |
| Fat | 13% |
| Fibre | 4% |
| Ash | 11% |
| Moisture | 18% |
Energy: 309 kcal/100g
Additives & feeding info
Feeding and storage
Feeding guide
Hunde bis 5-10kg: 100-165g pro Tag; 10-20kg: 165-280g; 20-30kg: 280-380g; 30-40kg: 380-470g; ab 40kg: 470-560g. Tägliche Gesamtration, Richtwerte, frisches Wasser bereitstellen.
Additives declared on the label
Nutritional additives
Vitamin A 14000 IE/kg; Vitamin D3 1000 IE/kg; Vitamin E 100 mg/kg; Taurin 1000 mg/kg; Eisen (Eisen(II)-sulfat-Monohydrat) 50 mg/kg; Jod (wasserfreies Calciumjodat) 1.5 mg/kg; Kupfer (Kupfer(II)-sulfat-Pentahydrat) 10.0 mg/kg; Mangan (Mangan(II)-sulfat-Monohydrat) 5 mg/kg; Zink (Zinksulfat-Monohydrat) 62.5 mg/kg; Selen (Natriumselenit) 0.15 mg/kg
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-10-05
Brand and contact: Tales & Tails
- Website
- https://talesandtails.de/
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-10-05
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- talesandtails.de
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Brand and retailer reviews
External platform ratings are not scores for this individual recipe.
Trustpilot: 4.3/5 · 814 reviews
87 reviews on this product · 4.8/5
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
This recipe achieves an overall score of 59 out of 100 based on several key factors. The meat content contributed +3.2 points, while the overall quality of the ingredient list added +6.4 points. However, the processing format reduced the score by -6.7 points, and ingredients without printed percentages resulted in a deduction of -5.4 points.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.7 | 9.191 | +6.36 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 33.0% | 0.096 | +3.17 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 4.9% | -0.115 | -0.56 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 15.8% | -0.092 | -1.45 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 5.3% | -0.005 | -0.03 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 22.6% | -0.012 | -0.28 |
| Other share of dry matter | 7.4% | -0.375 | -2.76 |
| Recipe graded poor | 6.1% | -0.065 | -0.40 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 1 | -0.876 | -0.88 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 6.1% | 0.060 | +0.37 |
| Undeclared quantities | 51.0% | -0.106 | -5.38 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | yes | 0.707 | +0.71 |
| Processing multiplier | 0.98 | 33.786 | +33.11 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.7 | 9.191 | +6.36 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 33.0% | 0.096 | +3.17 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 4.9% | -0.115 | -0.56 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 15.8% | -0.092 | -1.45 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 5.3% | -0.005 | -0.03 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.163 | +0.00 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 22.6% | -0.012 | -0.28 |
| Other share of dry matter | 7.4% | -0.375 | -2.76 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.027 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 6.1% | -0.065 | -0.40 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 1 | -0.876 | -0.88 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 6.1% | 0.060 | +0.37 |
| Undeclared quantities | 51.0% | -0.106 | -5.38 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | yes | 0.707 | +0.71 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | no | -3.158 | +0.00 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | 0.00 | 0.222 | +0.00 |
| Processing multiplier | 0.98 | 33.786 | +33.11 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- +0.02
- Additives declared on label
- +1 transparency bonus
- Subtotal
- 59.5
- Final score
- 59/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 18.5 | 22.6 (band 18 to 40%) | 82.4 |
| Fat | 13 | 15.9 (band 5.5 to 20%) | 100 |
| Fibre | 4 | 4.9 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 100 |
| Energy (kcal/100g) | 309 | 376.8 | 100 |
Scored over 4 declared nutrients (combined weight 60); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score.
Declared fortification: 10 nutritional additives on the label
- Vitamin A 14000 IE/kg
- Vitamin D3 1000 IE/kg
- Vitamin E 100 mg/kg
- Taurin 1000 mg/kg
- Eisen (Eisen(II)-sulfat-Monohydrat) 50 mg/kg
- Jod (wasserfreies Calciumjodat) 1.5 mg/kg
- Kupfer (Kupfer(II)-sulfat-Pentahydrat) 10.0 mg/kg
- Mangan (Mangan(II)-sulfat-Monohydrat) 5 mg/kg
- Zink (Zinksulfat-Monohydrat) 62.5 mg/kg
- Selen (Natriumselenit) 0.15 mg/kg
Medium confidence: the full five-part analysis is on file; where moisture was not declared it was estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (49% of the recipe mass) (voluntary) | 9.8/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) | 15/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) | 5/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
Claims on file; none we can check against the label
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mit Grünlippmuschel: Kann Mobilität und Gelenke im Alltag unterstützen (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Mit Flohsamenschalen: Ballaststoffreiche Ergänzung zur Unterstützung einer geregelten Verdauung (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Soft & leicht zu kauen: Angenehm weiche Kroketten – ideal für ältere Hunde (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| 100% Pferd: Als einzige hochwertige und gut verträgliche Fleischquelle (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Mit wertvollem Hanföl: Liefert wertvolle Fettsäuren (on page) | Nutrient | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| 1 Tüte = 1 Spende für Tierschutzprojekte (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Alleinfuttermittel für Hunde ab dem 7. Lebensjahr (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Ohne Zusatz von Getreide oder Zucker (on page) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Ohne Tierversuche (on page) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Alternatives to Das hab ich mir PferDient - Senior
Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.