BEWI DOG® sensitive GF
Dry Extruded · completeClear label
Our verdict
Is BEWI DOG® sensitive GF a good dog food?
We score it 44/100 (Poor). The main reasons are set out in "Why you might not" below, and every step of the calculation is shown under "How we calculated this score".
40% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
- Grain-free: no grain ingredients listed
- Doesn't list beef, lamb, fish, venison, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids chicken: the label lists dehydrated poultry proteins
- Your dog avoids turkey: the label lists dehydrated poultry proteins
- Your dog avoids pork: the label lists hydrolysed pork
- You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Ingredients (18)40% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- unknown 35.8%
- carb 29.6%
- meat 8.7%
- supplement 7.1%
- oil 6.3%
- fibre 6.2%
- veg 4.1%
- additive 2.1%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Poultry protein | Dehydrated Poultry Proteins | meat · good | - | 3.7 |
| 2 | dried (30%) | unmatched | - | 30 | 30.0 |
| 3 | Pea flour (26%) | Pea flour | carb · medium | 26 | 26.0 |
| 4 | Potato starch | Potato starch | carb · poor | - | 3.6 |
| 5 | Dried beet pulp | Beet Pulp | fibre · medium | - | 3.5 |
| 6 | desugared | unmatched | - | - | 3.3 |
| 7 | Poultry fat | Poultry Fat | oil · medium | - | 3.2 |
| 8 | palm | Palm Oil | oil · poor | - | 3.1 |
| 9 | coconut | Coconut | veg · good | - | 2.9 |
| 10 | Brewers' yeast | Brewer's Yeast | supplement · good | - | 2.8 |
| 11 | dried (2.5%) | unmatched | - | 2.5 | 2.5 |
| 12 | Carob pods | Carob Pods | fibre · medium | - | 2.7 |
| 13 | Linseed (1.2%) | Linseed | veg · good | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| 14 | Poultry liver | Chicken Liver | meat · good | - | 2.5 |
| 15 | hydrolysed | Hydrolysed Pork | meat · medium | - | 2.4 |
| 16 | Dicalcium phosphate | Dicalcium phosphate | supplement · medium | - | 2.3 |
| 17 | Sodium chloride | Salt | additive · poor | - | 2.1 |
| 18 | Potassium chloride | Potassium Chloride | supplement · medium | - | 2.0 |
- 1. Poultry protein3.7% estimated
- 2. dried (30%)30% declared30.0% estimated
- 3. Pea flour (26%)26% declared26.0% estimated
- 4. Potato starch3.6% estimated
- 5. Dried beet pulp3.5% estimated
- 6. desugared3.3% estimated
- 7. Poultry fat3.2% estimated
- 8. palm3.1% estimated
- 9. coconut2.9% estimated
- 10. Brewers' yeast2.8% estimated
- 11. dried (2.5%)2.5% declared2.5% estimated
- 12. Carob pods2.7% estimated
- 13. Linseed (1.2%)1.2% declared1.2% estimated
- 14. Poultry liver2.5% estimated
- 15. hydrolysed2.4% estimated
- 16. Dicalcium phosphate2.3% estimated
- 17. Sodium chloride2.1% estimated
- 18. Potassium chloride2.0% estimated
Nutrition and feeding
Declared analysis (as fed)
No analysis recorded yet.
Additives & feeding info
Feeding and storage
Feeding guide
Recommended quantity of food per animal in g/day (normal / very active): 3 kg: 60/70 g; 5 kg: 90/100 g; 10 kg: 140/170 g; 15 kg: 200/230 g; 20 kg: 240/280 g; 25 kg: 290/330 g; 35 kg: 370/430 g; 50 kg: 480/560 g; 65 kg: 590/680 g; 80 kg: 690/790 g (figures based on adult weight).
No additives recorded yet.
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-19
Brand and contact: BEWI DOG®
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-19
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- bewi-dog.de
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
This recipe achieves a total score of 44 out of 100 based on several key factors. The overall quality of the ingredient list contributed +2.9 points to the score. However, the processing format reduced the score by -6.7. Furthermore, ingredients without printed percentages subtracted -4.3, and the carbohydrate content contributed -4 to the calculation.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.3 | 9.191 | +2.88 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 34.5% | -0.115 | -3.98 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 8.9% | -0.092 | -0.81 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 2.2% | -0.005 | -0.01 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 2.7% | 0.163 | +0.45 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 9.3% | -0.012 | -0.11 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 25.5% | -0.027 | -0.68 |
| Recipe graded poor | 8.8% | -0.065 | -0.57 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 3 | -0.876 | -2.63 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 3.6% | 0.060 | +0.22 |
| Undeclared quantities | 40.3% | -0.106 | -4.25 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| Additive penalty | -2.61 | 0.222 | -0.58 |
| Processing multiplier | 0.98 | 33.786 | +33.11 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.3 | 9.191 | +2.88 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.096 | +0.00 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 34.5% | -0.115 | -3.98 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 8.9% | -0.092 | -0.81 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 2.2% | -0.005 | -0.01 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 2.7% | 0.163 | +0.45 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 9.3% | -0.012 | -0.11 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.375 | +0.00 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 25.5% | -0.027 | -0.68 |
| Recipe graded poor | 8.8% | -0.065 | -0.57 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 3 | -0.876 | -2.63 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 3.6% | 0.060 | +0.22 |
| Undeclared quantities | 40.3% | -0.106 | -4.25 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | no | 2.294 | +0.00 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | no | 0.707 | +0.00 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | -2.61 | 0.222 | -0.58 |
| Processing multiplier | 0.98 | 33.786 | +33.11 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- +0.02
- Subtotal
- 44.1
- Final score
- 44/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
Analytical constituents not declared
No nutritional additives section declared on the label.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (59.7% of the recipe mass) (voluntary) | 11.9/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) - not on file | 0/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared, Additives declared, Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
67/100 · limited — 3 checkable claims: 2 consistent, 1 contradicted.
Contradicted by the label
- "Single protein source: Poultry" — the declared label says otherwise on single protein.
Consistent with the label
- "Made without grain" — supported by the declared grain-free data.
- "no-grain formula" — supported by the declared grain-free data.
10 further claims on file that we cannot check against the label.
Limited: at least one claim contradicts the declared label, or a recent upheld ASA ruling applies.
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| No artificial colourings, flavourings or preservatives (on pack) | provenance | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Promotes skin and fur with brewers’ yeast, lecithin, linseed as a source of omega-3 fatty acids (on pack) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Mannan oligosaccharides (MOS) from the cell walls of brewers’ yeast promote healthy digestion and help to improve immunity (on pack) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Easily digestible thanks to the high poultry content (on pack) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Rich in peas; slow digestion helps a longer-lasting satiety and contributes to a reduction of the blood sugar level increase after feeding (on pack) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| natural anti-oxidants (on pack) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Single protein source: Poultry (on pack) | Content | contradicted | Manufacturer assertion |
| Made without soya products (on pack) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Ratio of animal protein to total protein: 80 % (on pack) | Nutrient | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Made without grain (on pack) | Free-from | consistent | Manufacturer assertion |
| Super Premium Quality (on pack) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| no-grain formula (on pack) | Free-from | consistent | Manufacturer assertion |
| Complete feed for dogs with sensitivity towards grain (on pack) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Alternatives to sensitive GF
Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.