BEWI DOG® h-energy
Dry Extruded · completeHigh meatClear label
Our verdict
Is BEWI DOG® h-energy a good dog food?
We score it 54/100 (Average). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
62% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
- Doesn't list beef, lamb, venison, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids chicken: the label lists dehydrated poultry proteins
- Your dog avoids turkey: the label lists dehydrated poultry proteins
- Your dog avoids fish: the label lists fish meal
- Your dog avoids pork: the label lists hydrolysed pork
- Your dog avoids grain: the label lists maize / corn
- You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Ingredients (18)62% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- meat 46.3%
- carb 14.4%
- oil 10.2%
- fibre 7.8%
- supplement 6.8%
- unknown 6.6%
- veg 4.8%
- additive 3.0%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Poultry Protein (30%) | Dehydrated Poultry Proteins | meat · good | 30 | 30.0 |
| 2 | Maize | Maize / Corn | carb · medium | - | 5.3 |
| 3 | Poultry Fat | Poultry Fat | oil · medium | - | 5.2 |
| 4 | Palm | Palm Oil | oil · poor | - | 5.0 |
| 5 | Coconut | Coconut | veg · good | - | 4.8 |
| 6 | Fish Meal From Seafish (6%) | Fish Meal | meat · medium | 6 | 6.0 |
| 7 | Rice | Rice - white | carb · medium | - | 4.6 |
| 8 | Barley | Barley | carb · medium | - | 4.5 |
| 9 | Dried Beet Pulp | Beet Pulp | fibre · medium | - | 4.3 |
| 10 | Desugared | unmatched | - | - | 4.1 |
| 11 | Brewers' Yeast | Brewer's Yeast | supplement · good | - | 3.9 |
| 12 | Dried (2.5%) | unmatched | - | 2.5 | 2.5 |
| 13 | Egg | Egg | meat · good | - | 3.7 |
| 14 | Carob Pods | Carob Pods | fibre · medium | - | 3.6 |
| 15 | Poultry Liver | Chicken Liver | meat · good | - | 3.4 |
| 16 | Hydrolysed | Hydrolysed Pork | meat · medium | - | 3.2 |
| 17 | Sodium Chloride | Salt | additive · poor | - | 3.0 |
| 18 | Potassium Chloride | Potassium Chloride | supplement · medium | - | 2.9 |
- 1. Poultry Protein (30%)30% declared30.0% estimated
- 2. Maize5.3% estimated
- 3. Poultry Fat5.2% estimated
- 4. Palm5.0% estimated
- 5. Coconut4.8% estimated
- 6. Fish Meal From Seafish (6%)6% declared6.0% estimated
- 7. Rice4.6% estimated
- 8. Barley4.5% estimated
- 9. Dried Beet Pulp4.3% estimated
- 10. Desugared4.1% estimated
- 11. Brewers' Yeast3.9% estimated
- 12. Dried (2.5%)2.5% declared2.5% estimated
- 13. Egg3.7% estimated
- 14. Carob Pods3.6% estimated
- 15. Poultry Liver3.4% estimated
- 16. Hydrolysed3.2% estimated
- 17. Sodium Chloride3.0% estimated
- 18. Potassium Chloride2.9% estimated
Nutrition and feeding
Declared analysis (as fed)
No analysis recorded yet.
Additives & feeding info
Feeding and storage
Feeding guide
Recommended quantity of food per animal in g/day: normal/very active: 3 kg 60 g/90 g; 5 kg 80 g/150 g; 10 kg 140 g/250 g; 15 kg 190 g/345 g; 20 kg 230 g/425 g; 25 kg 270 g/500 g; 35 kg 350 g/650 g; 50 kg 460 g/850 g; 65 kg 650 g/1200 g; 80 kg 700 g/1300 g (quantities based on adult weight)
No additives recorded yet.
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-19
Brand and contact: BEWI DOG®
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-19
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- bewi-dog.de
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
This recipe achieves a total score of 54 out of 100 based on several key factors. The meat content contributed +3.9 points, while the overall quality of the ingredient list added +4.4 points. Conversely, the processing format subtracted -6.7 points, and ingredients without printed percentages reduced the score by -6.5 points.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.5 | 9.191 | +4.40 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 41.0% | 0.096 | +3.93 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 15.7% | -0.115 | -1.81 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 12.4% | -0.092 | -1.14 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 3.4% | 0.163 | +0.55 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 7.7% | -0.012 | -0.09 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 4.1% | -0.027 | -0.11 |
| Recipe graded poor | 8.0% | -0.065 | -0.52 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 2 | -0.876 | -1.75 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 5.0% | 0.060 | +0.30 |
| Undeclared quantities | 61.5% | -0.106 | -6.49 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | yes | 0.707 | +0.71 |
| Additive penalty | -3.70 | 0.222 | -0.82 |
| Processing multiplier | 0.98 | 33.786 | +33.11 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.5 | 9.191 | +4.40 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 41.0% | 0.096 | +3.93 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 15.7% | -0.115 | -1.81 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 12.4% | -0.092 | -1.14 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 0.9% | -0.005 | -0.00 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 3.4% | 0.163 | +0.55 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 7.7% | -0.012 | -0.09 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.375 | +0.00 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 4.1% | -0.027 | -0.11 |
| Recipe graded poor | 8.0% | -0.065 | -0.52 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 2 | -0.876 | -1.75 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 5.0% | 0.060 | +0.30 |
| Undeclared quantities | 61.5% | -0.106 | -6.49 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | no | 2.294 | +0.00 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | yes | 0.707 | +0.71 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | no | -3.158 | +0.00 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | -3.70 | 0.222 | -0.82 |
| Processing multiplier | 0.98 | 33.786 | +33.11 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- +0.02
- Subtotal
- 54.5
- Final score
- 54/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
Analytical constituents not declared
No nutritional additives section declared on the label.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (38.5% of the recipe mass) (voluntary) | 7.7/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) - not on file | 0/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared, Additives declared, Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
0/100 · limited — 1 checkable claim: 0 consistent, 1 contradicted.
Contradicted by the label
- "Made without wheat products" — the declared label says otherwise on grain-free.
10 further claims on file that we cannot check against the label.
Limited: at least one claim contradicts the declared label, or a recent upheld ASA ruling applies.
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Promotes muscle building thanks to the high content of animal protein (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Easily digestible thanks to the high proportion of poultry and fish (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Promotes skin and fur with brewers´ yeast and lecithin (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Mannan oligosaccharides (MOS) from the cell walls of brewers‘ yeast promote healthy digestion and help to improve immunity (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Ratio of animal protein to total protein: 85 % (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Super Premium Quality (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Made without soya products (on page) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Made without wheat products (on page) | Free-from | contradicted | Manufacturer assertion |
| optimum protein and energy ratio (protein content 30%, fat content 20%) for very high activity levels (on page) | Nutrient | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| natural anti-oxidants (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| No artificial colourings, flavourings or preservatives (on page) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Alternatives to h-energy
Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.