Our verdict
Is About Us Lakefish & Liver Paté a good dog food?
We score it 46/100 (Average). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
100% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for all lifestages
- Single named protein: pork
- Doesn't list chicken, beef, turkey, lamb, fish, venison, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids grain: the label lists rice flour
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Ingredients (41)100% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- supplement 58.1%
- additive 11.3%
- mineral 9.3%
- carb 8.8%
- unknown 3.2%
- other 3.2%
- meat 3.1%
- veg 3.0%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Great Lakes Lakefish | unmatched | - | - | 3.2 |
| 2 | Broth | Cooking broth | other · medium | - | 3.2 |
| 3 | Pork Liver | Pork Liver | meat · good | - | 3.1 |
| 4 | Brown Rice Flour | Rice flour | carb · medium | - | 3.1 |
| 5 | Pea Starch | Pea Starch | carb · poor | - | 3.1 |
| 6 | Flaxseed | Linseed | veg · good | - | 3.0 |
| 7 | Tricalcium Phosphate | Tricalcium phosphate | supplement · good | - | 3.0 |
| 8 | Potassium Chloride | Potassium Chloride | supplement · medium | - | 3.0 |
| 9 | Sodium Chloride | Salt | additive · poor | - | 2.9 |
| 10 | Threonine | Threonine | supplement · medium | - | 2.9 |
| 11 | Cassia gum | Cassia gum | additive · poor | - | 2.8 |
| 12 | carrageenan | Carrageenan | additive · poor | - | 2.8 |
| 13 | Magnesium Sulphate | Magnesium Sulphate | mineral · good | - | 2.8 |
| 14 | Guar Gum | Guar gum | additive · medium | - | 2.7 |
| 15 | Choline Chloride | Choline | supplement · good | - | 2.7 |
| 16 | Methionine | Methionine | supplement · good | - | 2.6 |
| 17 | Pea Starch | Pea Starch | carb · poor | - | 2.6 |
| 18 | Taurine | Taurine | supplement · good | - | 2.6 |
| 19 | Calcium Carbonate | Calcium Carbonate | supplement · medium | - | 2.5 |
| 20 | Ferrous Sulphate | Iron sulfate | supplement · good | - | 2.5 |
| 21 | Zinc Sulphate | Zinc sulfate | supplement · medium | - | 2.4 |
| 22 | Vitamin E Supplement | Vitamin E | supplement · good | - | 2.4 |
| 23 | Zinc Amino Acid Complex | Zinc Oxide | supplement · good | - | 2.4 |
| 24 | Iron Amino Acid Complex | Iron | mineral · good | - | 2.3 |
| 25 | Niacin Supplement | Niacin | supplement · good | - | 2.3 |
| 26 | Thiamine Mononitrate | Thiamine mononitrate | supplement · good | - | 2.2 |
| 27 | Copper Sulphate | Copper sulphate | supplement · good | - | 2.2 |
| 28 | Selenium | Selenium | mineral · good | - | 2.2 |
| 29 | Calcium Pantothenate Supplement | Calcium pantothenate | supplement · good | - | 2.1 |
| 30 | Biotin Supplement | Biotin | supplement · good | - | 2.1 |
| 31 | Copper Amino Acid Complex | Copper | mineral · good | - | 2.0 |
| 32 | Manganese Sulphate | Manganese sulfate | supplement · medium | - | 2.0 |
| 33 | Vitamin A Supplement | Vitamin A | supplement · good | - | 2.0 |
| 34 | Manganese Amino Acid Complex | Manganese | supplement · good | - | 1.9 |
| 35 | Riboflavin | Riboflavin | supplement · good | - | 1.9 |
| 36 | Pyridoxin Hydrochloride | Pyridoxine hydrochloride | supplement · good | - | 1.8 |
| 37 | Vitamin B12 Supplement | Vitamin B12 | supplement · good | - | 1.8 |
| 38 | Calcium Iodate | Calcium iodate | supplement · medium | - | 1.8 |
| 39 | Folic Acid Supplement | Folic acid | supplement · good | - | 1.7 |
| 40 | Vitamin D3 Supplement | Vitamin D3 supplement | supplement · good | - | 1.7 |
| 41 | Menadione Sodium Bisulfite Complex (source of Vitamin K activity) | Menadione sodium bisulfite complex | supplement · poor | - | 1.7 |
- 1. Great Lakes Lakefish3.2% estimated
- 2. Broth3.2% estimated
- 3. Pork Liver3.1% estimated
- 4. Brown Rice Flour3.1% estimated
- 5. Pea Starch3.1% estimated
- 6. Flaxseed3.0% estimated
- 7. Tricalcium Phosphate3.0% estimated
- 8. Potassium Chloride3.0% estimated
- 9. Sodium Chloride2.9% estimated
- 10. Threonine2.9% estimated
- 11. Cassia gum2.8% estimated
- 12. carrageenan2.8% estimated
- 13. Magnesium Sulphate2.8% estimated
- 14. Guar Gum2.7% estimated
- 15. Choline Chloride2.7% estimated
- 16. Methionine2.6% estimated
- 17. Pea Starch2.6% estimated
- 18. Taurine2.6% estimated
- 19. Calcium Carbonate2.5% estimated
- 20. Ferrous Sulphate2.5% estimated
- 21. Zinc Sulphate2.4% estimated
- 22. Vitamin E Supplement2.4% estimated
- 23. Zinc Amino Acid Complex2.4% estimated
- 24. Iron Amino Acid Complex2.3% estimated
- 25. Niacin Supplement2.3% estimated
- 26. Thiamine Mononitrate2.2% estimated
- 27. Copper Sulphate2.2% estimated
- 28. Selenium2.2% estimated
- 29. Calcium Pantothenate Supplement2.1% estimated
- 30. Biotin Supplement2.1% estimated
- 31. Copper Amino Acid Complex2.0% estimated
- 32. Manganese Sulphate2.0% estimated
- 33. Vitamin A Supplement2.0% estimated
- 34. Manganese Amino Acid Complex1.9% estimated
- 35. Riboflavin1.9% estimated
- 36. Pyridoxin Hydrochloride1.8% estimated
- 37. Vitamin B12 Supplement1.8% estimated
- 38. Calcium Iodate1.8% estimated
- 39. Folic Acid Supplement1.7% estimated
- 40. Vitamin D3 Supplement1.7% estimated
- 41. Menadione Sodium Bisulfite Complex (source of Vitamin K activity)1.7% estimated
Nutrition and feedingProtein 8% · Fat 5%
Guaranteed analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed |
|---|---|
| Protein | 8% |
| Fat | 5% |
| Fibre | 0.50% |
| Ash | 2.50% |
| Moisture | 78% |
Energy: 97 kcal/100g
Additives & feeding info
Feeding and storage
Feeding guide
3-12lbs (1.5-5.5kg): 1/2 can (~185g); 12-25lbs (5.5-11.3kg): 1/2–1 can (185-369g); 25-50lbs (11.3-22.5kg): 1–1 1/2 cans (369-553g); 50-70lbs (22.5-31.8kg): 1 1/2–2 cans (553-738g); 70-90lbs (31.8-40.8kg): 2–2 1/2 cans (738-923g)
No additives recorded yet.
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-19
Brand and contact: About Us
- Phone
- 519-638-3003
- Address
- 58 McGivern Street, PO Box 9, Moorefield, ON N0G 2K0
- Contact page
- canadianpetfood.com
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-19
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- canadianpetfood.com
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
This recipe achieves a total score of 46 out of 100 based on several key factors. The presence of ingredients without printed percentages contributed -10.6 to the overall rating, while the overall quality of the ingredient list added +4.6. Furthermore, the additive load contributed -3, and the additives in the recipe adjusted the score by +1.9.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.5 | 9.191 | +4.59 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 9.1% | -0.115 | -1.05 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 3.2% | -0.005 | -0.02 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 11.8% | 0.163 | +1.93 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 62.5% | -0.012 | -0.76 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.2% | -0.375 | -0.07 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 1.9% | -0.027 | -0.05 |
| Recipe graded poor | 15.9% | -0.065 | -1.03 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 6 | -0.876 | -5.26 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 3.1% | 0.060 | +0.18 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| Additive penalty | -13.67 | 0.222 | -3.03 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 33.786 | +33.79 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | yes | -0.672 | -0.67 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.5 | 9.191 | +4.59 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.096 | +0.00 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 9.1% | -0.115 | -1.05 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.092 | +0.00 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 3.2% | -0.005 | -0.02 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 11.8% | 0.163 | +1.93 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 62.5% | -0.012 | -0.76 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.2% | -0.375 | -0.07 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 1.9% | -0.027 | -0.05 |
| Recipe graded poor | 15.9% | -0.065 | -1.03 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 6 | -0.876 | -5.26 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 3.1% | 0.060 | +0.18 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | no | 2.294 | +0.00 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | no | 0.707 | +0.00 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | -13.67 | 0.222 | -3.03 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 33.786 | +33.79 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | yes | -0.672 | -0.67 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- -0.08
- Subtotal
- 45.7
- Final score
- 46/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
Guaranteed-analysis FEDIAF score: crude minimums and maximums are bounds, not typical values; moisture (a maximum) uses the processing median where available; experimental US score.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 8 | 36.4 (band 19.84090909090909 to 40%) | 100 |
| Fat | 5 | 22.7 (band 6.0625 to 20%) | 100 |
| Fibre | 0.5 | 2.3 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 93.6 |
| Energy (kcal/100g) | 97 | 440.9 | 100 |
Scored over 4 declared nutrients (combined weight 60); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score. Moisture was not declared and was estimated at 78% from the food type.
No nutritional additives section declared on the label.
Low confidence: partial analysis or moisture estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (voluntary) - not on file | 0/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) | 15/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) | 5/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Additives declared, Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
Claims on file; none we can check against the label
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| formulated to meet the AAFCO Nutrient Requirements for Growth, Maintenance and Reproduction (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| exceeds the NRC Nutrient Requirements for Dogs and Cats (2006) (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Meets AAFCO requirements (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| For Adult dogs with moderate activity (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| DOG Food – suitable for all life stages (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| All Breeds (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Alternatives to Lakefish & Liver Paté
Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.