About Us Chicken & Liver Paté

Wet Pate complete

Chicken & Liver Paté
Average
our rating

Is About Us Chicken & Liver Paté a good dog food?

We score it 53/100 (Average). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.

How we score

Why this score?

This recipe achieves a total score of 53 out of 100 based on several key factors. The presence of ingredients without printed percentages contributed -10.6 to the overall rating, while the overall quality of the ingredient list added +5.4. Furthermore, the additive load contributed -3.9, and the additives in the recipe adjusted the score by +2.6.

Only part of the analytical constituents are declared, so the nutritional picture is incomplete.

100% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.

The Recipe score measures how attractive and transparent the declared ingredient list is. It is not, by itself, proof that the food is nutritionally appropriate for long-term feeding. The Nutritional and Evidence scores measure what we can verify towards that stronger claim.

Why you might choose it

  • Declares energy content, which most labels omit.
  • Nutritionally complete: formulated to be fed as the whole diet.

Why you might not

  • Meat makes up an estimated 3% of the dry matter (8% as fed); carbohydrates dominate.
  • 100% of the recipe mass has no printed percentage, so the exact split cannot be verified.
  • Its additive load costs about 4 points in the rating.

View the source page

Estimated composition

supplement56.1%
additive14.3%
meat8.4%
mineral6.6%
other4.1%
carb4.0%
oil4.0%
unknown2.4%

Typical analysis (as fed)

Protein
9%
Fat
7%
Fibre
1%
Moisture
78%

Energy: 106 kcal/100g

Additives & feeding info

Nutritional additives

Ferrous Sulphate; Zinc Oxide; Vitamin E Supplement; Copper Sulphate; Selenium; Vitamin B12 Supplement; Folic Acid Supplement; Niacin Supplement; Vitamin A Supplement; Calcium Pantothenate Supplement; Manganese Oxide; Riboflavin; Menadione Sodium Bisulfite Complex (source of Vitamin K activity); Biotin Supplement; Pyridoxin Hydrochloride; Thiamine Mononitrate; Vitamin D3 Supplement; Calcium Iodate

Feeding guide

3-12lbs (1.5-5.5kg): up to 1/2 can (185g); 12-25lbs (5.5-11.3kg): 1/2–1 can (185-369g); 25-50lbs (11.3-22.5kg): 1–1 1/2 can (369-553g); 50-70lbs (22.5-31.8kg): 1 1/2–2 cans (553-738g); 70-90lbs (31.8-40.8kg): 2–2 1/2 cans (738-923g). Adjust to maintain optimal body condition. Transition over 7 days. Keep fresh water available.

Who is this food for?

Suits

  • Labelled by the manufacturer for all lifestages
  • Doesn't list beef, turkey, lamb, fish, venison, duck as ingredients

Consider something else if:

  • Your dog avoids chicken: the label lists chicken
  • Your dog avoids pork: the label lists pork liver
  • Your dog avoids grain: the label lists rice flour
  • You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein

These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Use the homepage filter to find foods that fit your dog.

Ingredients (31)

#As declaredMatchedCategoryTierDeclared %Est. %
1ChickenChickenmeatmedium-4.3
2Pork LiverPork Livermeatgood-4.2
3Chicken BrothCooking brothothermedium-4.1
4Brown Rice FlourRice flourcarbmedium-4.0
5Chicken FatChicken Oil and Fatoilmedium-4.0
6Tricalcium PhosphateTricalcium phosphatesupplementgood-3.9
7Potassium ChloridePotassium Chloridesupplementmedium-3.8
8Choline ChlorideCholinesupplementgood-3.8
9Sodium ChlorideSaltadditivemedium-3.7
10Cassia GumCassia gumadditivepoor-3.6
11CarrageenanCarrageenanadditivepoor-3.6
12Magnesium SulphateMagnesium Sulphatemineralgood-3.5
13Guar GumGuar gumadditivemedium-3.4
14Ferrous SulphateIron sulfatesupplementgood-3.4
15Zinc OxideZinc Oxidesupplementgood-3.3
16Vitamin E SupplementVitamin Esupplementgood-3.2
17Copper SulphateCopper sulphatesupplementgood-3.2
18SeleniumSeleniummineralgood-3.1
19Vitamin B12 SupplementVitamin B12supplementgood-3.0
20Folic Acid SupplementFolic acidsupplementgood-3.0
21Niacin SupplementNiacinsupplementgood-2.9
22Vitamin A SupplementVitamin Asupplementgood-2.8
23Calcium Pantothenate SupplementCalcium pantothenatesupplementgood-2.7
24Manganese OxideManganese (II) Oxidesupplementgood-2.7
25RiboflavinRiboflavinsupplementgood-2.6
26Menadione Sodium Bisulfite Complex (source of Vitamin K activity)Menadione sodium bisulfite complexsupplementpoor-2.5
27Biotin SupplementBiotinsupplementgood-2.5
28Pyridoxine HydrochloridePyridoxine hydrochloridesupplementgood-2.4
29Thiamine MononitrateThiamine mononitratesupplementgood-2.3
30Vitamin D3 SupplementVitamin D3 supplementsupplementgood-2.3
31Calcium IodateCalcium iodatesupplementmedium-2.2

Brand

About Us logo
Phone
519-638-3003
Address
58 McGivern Street, PO Box 9, Moorefield, ON N0G 2K0

Trust and provenance

Recall history
No recalls recorded in our database
Label data last checked
2026-09-19
Scored with
Model v3 (methodology)

Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.

Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.

Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated

Scored with model v3 on 2026-09-26. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.

ComponentInputCoefficientContribution
Base score-30.909+30.91
Average ingredient quality0.69.191+5.44
Carb share of dry matter4.4%-0.115-0.51
Oil share of dry matter4.8%-0.092-0.44
Additive share of dry matter15.7%0.163+2.56
Supplement share of dry matter62.8%-0.012-0.77
Other share of dry matter0.3%-0.375-0.09
Unrecognised share of dry matter1.5%-0.027-0.04
Recipe graded poor9.7%-0.065-0.63
Number of poor ingredients3-0.876-2.63
Largest single poor ingredient3.6%0.060+0.22
Undeclared quantities100.0%-0.106-10.56
Complete dietyes2.294+2.29
Low meat (under 10% of dry matter)yes-3.158-3.16
Additive penalty-17.430.222-3.87
Processing multiplier1.0033.786+33.79
Processing: Wet Pateyes-0.672-0.67
Show all 40 components
ComponentInputCoefficientContribution
Base score-30.909+30.91
Average ingredient quality0.69.191+5.44
Meat share of dry matter0.0%0.096+0.00
Carb share of dry matter4.4%-0.115-0.51
Oil share of dry matter4.8%-0.092-0.44
Vegetable share of dry matter0.0%-0.005+0.00
Additive share of dry matter15.7%0.163+2.56
Supplement share of dry matter62.8%-0.012-0.77
Other share of dry matter0.3%-0.375-0.09
Unrecognised share of dry matter1.5%-0.027-0.04
Recipe graded poor9.7%-0.065-0.63
Poor-quality meat in recipe0.0%-0.179+0.00
Number of poor ingredients3-0.876-2.63
Largest single poor ingredient3.6%0.060+0.22
Undeclared quantities100.0%-0.106-10.56
Prints ingredient percentagesno0.000+0.00
Complete dietyes2.294+2.29
Frozen or chilled freshno0.000+0.00
High meat (30%+ of dry matter)no0.707+0.00
Low meat (under 10% of dry matter)yes-3.158-3.16
High carb and low meatno-1.180+0.00
Meat share × printed percentages0.00.000+0.00
Meat share × fresh0.00.000+0.00
Fresh × high meat0.011.084+0.00
Additive penalty-17.430.222-3.87
Processing multiplier1.0033.786+33.79
Processing: Rawno-0.054+0.00
Processing: Fresh Chilledno-2.354+0.00
Processing: Fresh Frozenno-2.354+0.00
Processing: Fresh Refrigeratedno0.000+0.00
Processing: Fresh Shelfno-0.672+0.00
Processing: Dry Freeze Driedno6.629+0.00
Processing: Dry Air Driedno6.331+0.00
Processing: Dry Cold Pressedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Bakedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Extrudedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Semi Moistno-6.174+0.00
Processing: Dry Mueslino-10.146+0.00
Processing: Wet Pateyes-0.672-0.67
Processing: Wet Chunksno-0.672+0.00
Processing-type offset
-0.08
Additives declared on label
+1 transparency bonus
Subtotal
52.8
Final score
53/100

Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.

Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges

How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.

NutrientAs fed (label)Dry matter (scored)Score
Protein940.9 (band 18 to 40%)100
Fat731.8 (band 5.5 to 20%)100
Fibre14.5 (band 0.5 to 5%)100
Energy (kcal/100g)106481.8100

Scored over 4 declared nutrients (combined weight 60); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score.

Low confidence: partial analysis or moisture estimated from the food type.

This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.

Transparency: what the label discloses

How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.

ItemPoints
✓ Ingredient list on the label (mandatory)10/10
✗ Printed percentages on the label (voluntary) - not on file0/20
✗ Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file0/15
✓ Additives declared (mandatory)5/10
✓ Energy value declared (voluntary)5/5
✓ Complete/complementary designation (mandatory)5/5
✓ Feeding guidance given (mandatory)10/10
✓ Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory)10/10
✓ Country of manufacture stated (voluntary)10/10
✗ Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file0/5

Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared, Batch and date labelling).

Safety: recall history

Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.

No recalls recorded in our database.

Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it

The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.

Claims on file; none we can check against the label

ClaimTypeCheckSubstantiation
For Adult dogs with moderate activity (on page)Contentnot checkableManufacturer assertion
AAFCO Dog Food Nutrient Profiles (2016) (on page)Nutrientnot checkableManufacturer assertion
formulated to meet the AAFCO Nutrient Requirements for Growth, Maintenance and Reproduction (on page)Nutrientnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Meets AAFCO requirements (on page)Contentnot checkableManufacturer assertion
exceeds the NRC Nutrient Requirements for Dogs and Cats (2006) (on page)Nutrientnot checkableManufacturer assertion
suitable for all life stages (on page)Contentnot checkableManufacturer assertion

The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.

Other products from About Us

See all products from About Us

Alternatives to Chicken & Liver Paté

Foods in our database that are similar on ingredients, protein, format or price. Scores and figures are from the same deterministic model used everywhere on the site.

See all alternatives

Community

Owners' verdict
0 votes

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.

Comments are reviewed before they appear.