Our verdict
Is Petzyo Got Beef a good dog food?
We score it 88/100 (Good). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
35% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for all lifestages
- Grain-free: no grain ingredients listed
- Doesn't list turkey, lamb, venison, pork, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids chicken: the label lists chicken
- Your dog avoids beef: the label lists beef
- Your dog avoids fish: the label lists salmon
- You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Ingredients (22)35% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- meat 60.3%
- veg 21.9%
- supplement 14.1%
- oil 2.0%
- mineral 1.8%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 12% Meat | Beef | meat · medium | 12 | 12.0 |
| 2 | 12% Heart | Beef Heart | meat · good | 12 | 12.0 |
| 3 | 12% Trachea | Trachea | meat · good | 12 | 12.0 |
| 4 | 12% Crushed Bone and Cartilage | Cartilage | supplement · good | 12 | 12.0 |
| 5 | 5% Liver | Beef Liver | meat · good | 5 | 5.0 |
| 6 | 12% Kidney | Beef Kidney | meat · good | 12 | 12.0 |
| 7 | Celery | Celery Seeds | veg · good | - | 2.9 |
| 8 | Green Beans | Green Beans | veg · good | - | 2.8 |
| 9 | Beetroot | Beetroot | veg · good | - | 2.7 |
| 10 | Whole Chicken Eggs | Chicken | meat · medium | - | 2.6 |
| 11 | Tasmanian Salmon | Salmon | meat · good | - | 2.5 |
| 12 | Strawberries | Strawberries | veg · good | - | 2.4 |
| 13 | Blueberries | Blueberries | veg · good | - | 2.3 |
| 14 | Goats Whey | Goat | meat · good | - | 2.2 |
| 15 | Shredded Coconut | Coconut | veg · good | - | 2.1 |
| 16 | Essential Vitamins and Minerals | Vitamins and minerals | supplement · medium | - | 2.1 |
| 17 | Canola Oil | Rapeseed oil | oil · good | - | 2.0 |
| 18 | Turmeric | Turmeric | veg · good | - | 1.9 |
| 19 | Sea Salt | Sea Salt | mineral · medium | - | 1.8 |
| 20 | Chia Seeds | Chia Seeds | veg · good | - | 1.7 |
| 21 | Kelp | Kelp | veg · good | - | 1.6 |
| 22 | Fresh Rosemary | Rosemary | veg · good | - | 1.5 |
- 1. 12% Meat12% declared12.0% estimated
- 2. 12% Heart12% declared12.0% estimated
- 3. 12% Trachea12% declared12.0% estimated
- 4. 12% Crushed Bone and Cartilage12% declared12.0% estimated
- 5. 5% Liver5% declared5.0% estimated
- 6. 12% Kidney12% declared12.0% estimated
- 7. Celery2.9% estimated
- 8. Green Beans2.8% estimated
- 9. Beetroot2.7% estimated
- 10. Whole Chicken Eggs2.6% estimated
- 11. Tasmanian Salmon2.5% estimated
- 12. Strawberries2.4% estimated
- 13. Blueberries2.3% estimated
- 14. Goats Whey2.2% estimated
- 15. Shredded Coconut2.1% estimated
- 16. Essential Vitamins and Minerals2.1% estimated
- 17. Canola Oil2.0% estimated
- 18. Turmeric1.9% estimated
- 19. Sea Salt1.8% estimated
- 20. Chia Seeds1.7% estimated
- 21. Kelp1.6% estimated
- 22. Fresh Rosemary1.5% estimated
Nutrition and feedingProtein 13% · Fat 9.50%
Declared analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed |
|---|---|
| Protein | 13% |
| Fat | 9.50% |
| Fibre | 1.30% |
| Ash | 1.10% |
| Moisture | 74.50% |
| Carbohydrates | 1.10% |
Energy: 137 kcal/100g
Additives & feeding info
No additives recorded yet.
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-17
Brand and contact: Petzyo
- Website
- https://petzyo.com.au/
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-17
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- petzyo.com.au
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Brand and retailer reviews
External platform ratings are not scores for this individual recipe.
Trustpilot: 4.7/5 · 30 reviews
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
We scored this food 88 out of 100. The overall quality of the ingredient list contributed +8.2 points. Ingredients without printed percentages reduced the score by -3.7, the meat content contributed +3.5, and being labelled nutritionally complete contributed +2.3.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.9 | 9.191 | +8.22 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 36.5% | 0.096 | +3.51 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 4.8% | -0.092 | -0.44 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 17.6% | -0.005 | -0.09 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 31.8% | -0.012 | -0.39 |
| Undeclared quantities | 35.0% | -0.106 | -3.70 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | yes | 0.707 | +0.71 |
| Fresh × high meat | 1.0 | 11.084 | +11.08 |
| Additive penalty | -0.04 | 0.222 | -0.01 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.12 | 33.786 | +37.84 |
| Processing: Raw | yes | -0.054 | -0.05 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.9 | 9.191 | +8.22 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 36.5% | 0.096 | +3.51 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.115 | +0.00 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 4.8% | -0.092 | -0.44 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 17.6% | -0.005 | -0.09 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.163 | +0.00 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 31.8% | -0.012 | -0.39 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.375 | +0.00 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.027 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 0.0% | -0.065 | +0.00 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 0 | -0.876 | +0.00 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 0.0% | 0.060 | +0.00 |
| Undeclared quantities | 35.0% | -0.106 | -3.70 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | yes | 0.707 | +0.71 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | no | -3.158 | +0.00 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 1.0 | 11.084 | +11.08 |
| Additive penalty | -0.04 | 0.222 | -0.01 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.12 | 33.786 | +37.84 |
| Processing: Raw | yes | -0.054 | -0.05 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- -1.74
- Subtotal
- 88.1
- Final score
- 88/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
Guaranteed-analysis FEDIAF score: crude minimums and maximums are bounds, not typical values; moisture (a maximum) uses the processing median where available; experimental US score.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 13 | 42.2 (band 20.016233766233768 to 40%) | 100 |
| Fat | 9.5 | 30.8 (band 6.116071428571429 to 20%) | 100 |
| Fibre | 1.3 | 4.2 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 100 |
| Energy (kcal/100g) | 137 | 444.8 | 100 |
Scored over 4 declared nutrients (combined weight 60); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score. Moisture was not declared and was estimated at 69.2% from the food type.
No nutritional additives section declared on the label.
Low confidence: partial analysis or moisture estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (65% of the recipe mass) (voluntary) | 13/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) | 15/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) | 5/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) - not on file | 0/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Additives declared, Feeding guidance given, Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
100/100 · moderate — 1 checkable claim: 1 consistent, 0 contradicted.
Consistent with the label
- "AAFCO & PFIAA complete & balanced" — supported by the declared complete and balanced data.
8 further claims on file that we cannot check against the label.
Moderate: every checkable claim is consistent with the declared label.
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| AAFCO & PFIAA complete & balanced (on page) | Content | consistent | Manufacturer assertion |
| Aussie made and owned (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| 100% human-grade, fresh ingredients (on page) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Aussie Beef 65% (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| High in protein (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Beef is a rich source of high-quality protein, which supports muscle growth, repair, and overall body function (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Rich in medium-chain triglycerides (MCTs) and lauric acid, coconut supports skin and coat health, digestion, and immune function in dogs (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Known for its anti-inflammatory properties, turmeric supports joint health, aids digestion, and boosts immunity (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Packed with essential vitamins and minerals, including iron, zinc, and B vitamins, which help maintain a strong immune system, healthy blood, and energy levels (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Alternatives to Got Beef
Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.