Our verdict
Is Dogpro Adult Beef a good dog food?
We score it 47/100 (Average). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
Only part of the analytical constituents are declared, so the nutritional picture is incomplete.
100% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
- Doesn't list turkey, lamb, fish, venison, pork, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids chicken: the label lists hydrolysed chicken protein
- Your dog avoids beef: the label lists beef
- Your dog avoids grain: the label lists wheat
- You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein
- You need more protein than this: 20.0% on a dry-matter basis is in the low band
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Ingredients (10)100% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- meat 41.3%
- supplement 18.1%
- carb 12.9%
- additive 11.0%
- oil 9.0%
- fibre 7.7%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wholegrain wheat | Wheat | carb · poor | - | 8.9 |
| 2 | Beef meal (38%) | Beef | meat · medium | 38 | 38.0 |
| 3 | Hydrolysed chicken protein | Hydrolysed Chicken Protein | meat · medium | - | 8.4 |
| 4 | Beef fat with mixed tocopherols & rosemary extract | Tocopherols | additive · good | - | 7.9 |
| 5 | Chicken gravy | Chicken | meat · medium | - | 7.4 |
| 6 | Essential minerals & vitamins | Vitamin | supplement · good | - | 6.9 |
| 7 | Vegetable oil | Vegetable oil | oil · medium | - | 6.4 |
| 8 | Methionine | Methionine | supplement · good | - | 5.9 |
| 9 | Chicory extract | Chicory Root Extract | fibre · good | - | 5.4 |
| 10 | Egg. | Egg | meat · good | - | 4.9 |
- 1. Wholegrain wheat8.9% estimated
- 2. Beef meal (38%)38% declared38.0% estimated
- 3. Hydrolysed chicken protein8.4% estimated
- 4. Beef fat with mixed tocopherols & rosemary extract7.9% estimated
- 5. Chicken gravy7.4% estimated
- 6. Essential minerals & vitamins6.9% estimated
- 7. Vegetable oil6.4% estimated
- 8. Methionine5.9% estimated
- 9. Chicory extract5.4% estimated
- 10. Egg.4.9% estimated
Nutrition and feedingProtein 20% · Fat 9%
Typical analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed |
|---|---|
| Protein | 20% |
| Fat | 9% |
| Carbohydrates | 55% |
Energy: 360 kcal/100g
Additives & feeding info
Feeding and storage
Storage
For optimal freshness, store in a cool, dry place away from direct sunlight.
Feeding guide
5kg 100g (3/4 cup); 10kg 170g (1 1/4 cup); 15kg 230g (1 3/4 cup); 20kg 290g (2 1/4 cup); 25kg 340g (2 3/2 cup); 30kg 390g (3 cup); 35kg 440g (3 1/2 cup); 40kg 490g (4 cup); 45kg 530g (4 1/4 cup); 50kg 570g (4 1/2 cup). One standard metric cup (250ml) = 125 grams. Pregnant or lactating dogs may require up to 50% more than maintenance amount.
Additives declared on the label
Technological additives
Beef fat with mixed tocopherols & rosemary extract
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-18
Brand and contact: Dogpro
- [email protected]
- Phone
- 1300 070 113
- Address
- 15 Box Avenue, Wilberforce NSW 2756
- Contact page
- www.dogpro.com.au
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-18
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- www.dogpro.com.au
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
This recipe achieves an overall rating of 47 out of 100 based on several key factors. The overall quality of the ingredient list contributed +4.5 points to the total. However, ingredients without printed percentages reduced the score by -10.6, the processing format subtracted -6.7, and the additive load contributed -3 points.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.5 | 9.191 | +4.47 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 14.5% | -0.115 | -1.66 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 11.4% | -0.092 | -1.05 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 12.6% | 0.163 | +2.05 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 21.2% | -0.012 | -0.26 |
| Recipe graded poor | 12.9% | -0.065 | -0.84 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 1 | -0.876 | -0.88 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 12.9% | 0.060 | +0.77 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| Additive penalty | -13.34 | 0.222 | -2.96 |
| Processing multiplier | 0.98 | 33.786 | +33.11 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.5 | 9.191 | +4.47 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.096 | +0.00 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 14.5% | -0.115 | -1.66 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 11.4% | -0.092 | -1.05 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.005 | +0.00 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 12.6% | 0.163 | +2.05 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 21.2% | -0.012 | -0.26 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.375 | +0.00 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.027 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 12.9% | -0.065 | -0.84 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 1 | -0.876 | -0.88 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 12.9% | 0.060 | +0.77 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | no | 0.707 | +0.00 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | -13.34 | 0.222 | -2.96 |
| Processing multiplier | 0.98 | 33.786 | +33.11 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- +0.02
- Additives declared on label
- +1 transparency bonus
- Subtotal
- 46.5
- Final score
- 47/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 20 | 22.1 (band 18 to 40%) | 81.2 |
| Fat | 9 | 9.9 (band 5.5 to 20%) | 88.4 |
| Energy (kcal/100g) | 360 | 397.8 | 100 |
Scored over 3 declared nutrients (combined weight 50); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score. Moisture was not declared and was estimated at 9.5% from the food type.
No nutritional additives section declared on the label.
Low confidence: partial analysis or moisture estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (voluntary) - not on file | 0/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) | 5/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared, Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
Claims on file; none we can check against the label
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Made with simple, quality ingredients and sourced locally (on page) | provenance | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| With natural sources of calcium and phosphorus for strong bones and joints (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Added vitamins and minerals to support immune health (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| A blend of grains and fibre to keep digestion on track (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| A balance of essential fatty acids and nutrients supports skin and coat condition (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| The kibble's texture assists in maintaining dental health through natural chewing (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Natural sources of calcium and phosphorus, including egg, to help support strong bones and joints (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Contains vitamins and minerals that provide antioxidant support for the immune system (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Aussie Beef (on pack) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Made with whole grains and enriched with beet pulp & chicory extract to help regulate gastrointestinal movement and encourage beneficial bacteria for optimal gut health (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| A blend of zinc, Omega 3 and 6 fatty acids, and egg, rich in biotin and essential amino acids, to nourish skin and promote a glossy coat (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Crunchy kibble texture promotes gentle abrasion to help maintain good oral health (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Australian Ingredients (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Alternatives to Adult Beef
Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.