Our verdict
Is Wysong Restore™ a good dog food?
We score it 49/100 (Average). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
Only part of the analytical constituents are declared, so the nutritional picture is incomplete.
100% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for all lifestages
- Single named protein: chicken
- Doesn't list beef, turkey, lamb, fish, venison, pork, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids grain: the label lists rice bran
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Ingredients (24)100% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- supplement 30.5%
- fibre 13.8%
- oil 13.6%
- additive 11.0%
- veg 10.8%
- meat 10.8%
- other 9.5%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dried Chicken | Dried chicken protein | meat · good | - | 5.5 |
| 2 | Organic Chicken | Chicken | meat · medium | - | 5.4 |
| 3 | Dried Natural Meat Broth | Cooking broth | other · medium | - | 5.3 |
| 4 | Chicken Fat | Chicken Oil and Fat | oil · good | - | 5.1 |
| 5 | Beet Pulp | Beet Pulp | fibre · medium | - | 5.0 |
| 6 | Gelatin | Gelatin | supplement · medium | - | 4.9 |
| 7 | Apple Fiber | Apple Fibre | fibre · medium | - | 4.8 |
| 8 | Flaxseeds | Linseed | veg · good | - | 4.7 |
| 9 | Natural Flavor | Flavor | additive · poor | - | 4.6 |
| 10 | Minerals (Potassium Chloride, Zinc Proteinate, Zinc Sulfate, Ferrous Sulfate, Iron Proteinate, Copper Sulfate, Copper Proteinate, Manganese Sulfate, Manganese Proteinate, Sodium Selenite, Calcium Iodate) | Vitamins and minerals | supplement · medium | - | 4.5 |
| 11 | Coconut Oil | Coconut Oil | oil · medium | - | 4.3 |
| 12 | Organic Chicken Bone Broth | Cooking broth | other · medium | - | 4.2 |
| 13 | Avocado Oil | Avocado Oil | oil · good | - | 4.1 |
| 14 | Rice Bran Oil | Rice bran | fibre · good | - | 4.0 |
| 15 | Taurine | Taurine | supplement · good | - | 3.9 |
| 16 | Calcium Carbonate | Calcium Carbonate | supplement · medium | - | 3.8 |
| 17 | Vitamins (Ascorbic Acid [source of Vitamin C], Vitamin E Supplement, Niacin Supplement, Calcium Pantothenate, Vitamin A Supplement, Thiamine Mononitrate, Pyridoxine Hydrochloride, Riboflavin Supplement, Vitamin D3 Supplement, Biotin, Vitamin B12 Supplement, Folic Acid) | Vitamins and minerals | supplement · medium | - | 3.7 |
| 18 | Calcium Propionate (a preservative) | Calcium Carbonate | supplement · medium | - | 3.5 |
| 19 | Choline Chloride | Choline | supplement · good | - | 3.4 |
| 20 | Citric Acid | Citric Acid | additive · medium | - | 3.3 |
| 21 | Chicory Root | Chicory root | veg · good | - | 3.2 |
| 22 | Mixed Tocopherols (a preservative) | Tocopherols | additive · good | - | 3.1 |
| 23 | Rosemary | Rosemary | veg · good | - | 3.0 |
| 24 | Yeast Cell Wall | Yeast | supplement · good | - | 2.9 |
- 1. Dried Chicken5.5% estimated
- 2. Organic Chicken5.4% estimated
- 3. Dried Natural Meat Broth5.3% estimated
- 4. Chicken Fat5.1% estimated
- 5. Beet Pulp5.0% estimated
- 6. Gelatin4.9% estimated
- 7. Apple Fiber4.8% estimated
- 8. Flaxseeds4.7% estimated
- 9. Natural Flavor4.6% estimated
- 10. Minerals (Potassium Chloride, Zinc Proteinate, Zinc Sulfate, Ferrous Sulfate, Iron Proteinate, Copper Sulfate, Copper Proteinate, Manganese Sulfate, Manganese Proteinate, Sodium Selenite, Calcium Iodate)4.5% estimated
- 11. Coconut Oil4.3% estimated
- 12. Organic Chicken Bone Broth4.2% estimated
- 13. Avocado Oil4.1% estimated
- 14. Rice Bran Oil4.0% estimated
- 15. Taurine3.9% estimated
- 16. Calcium Carbonate3.8% estimated
- 17. Vitamins (Ascorbic Acid [source of Vitamin C], Vitamin E Supplement, Niacin Supplement, Calcium Pantothenate, Vitamin A Supplement, Thiamine Mononitrate, Pyridoxine Hydrochloride, Riboflavin Supplement, Vitamin D3 Supplement, Biotin, Vitamin B12 Supplement, Folic Acid)3.7% estimated
- 18. Calcium Propionate (a preservative)3.5% estimated
- 19. Choline Chloride3.4% estimated
- 20. Citric Acid3.3% estimated
- 21. Chicory Root3.2% estimated
- 22. Mixed Tocopherols (a preservative)3.1% estimated
- 23. Rosemary3.0% estimated
- 24. Yeast Cell Wall2.9% estimated
Nutrition and feedingProtein 65% · Fat 20%
Guaranteed analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed |
|---|---|
| Protein | 65% |
| Fat | 20% |
| Fibre | 3% |
| Moisture | 10% |
| Omega-3 fatty acids | 0.20% |
Additives & feeding info
Feeding and storage
Feeding guide
Mix with present diet starting at about 10% and gradually increase. Cats: 5 lb = ¼-½ cup/day; 10-15 lb = ½-¾ cup/day; 20 lb = ¾-1 cup/day. Dogs: 3-5 lb = ¼-¾ cup/day; 10 lb = ¾-1 cup/day; 20 lb = 1-1¼ cup/day; 40 lb = 1¼-2 cup/day; 60 lb = 2-2¾ cup/day; 80 lb = 2¾-3¼ cup/day.
Additives declared on the label
Nutritional additives
Vitamin E Supplement; Niacin Supplement; Calcium Pantothenate; Vitamin A Supplement; Thiamine Mononitrate; Pyridoxine Hydrochloride; Riboflavin Supplement; Vitamin D3 Supplement; Biotin; Vitamin B12 Supplement; Folic Acid; Ascorbic Acid (source of Vitamin C); Choline Chloride; Taurine
Technological additives
Calcium Propionate (a preservative); Mixed Tocopherols (a preservative); Citric Acid; Rosemary
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-21
Brand and contact: Wysong
- Website
- https://www.wysong.net/
- Contact page
- www.wysong.net
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-21
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- www.wysong.net
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Brand and retailer reviews
External platform ratings are not scores for this individual recipe.
Trustpilot: 0.0/5 · 0 reviews
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
This recipe achieves an overall rating of 49 out of 100 based on several key factors. The overall quality of the ingredient list contributed +5.6 points to the total. However, ingredients without printed percentages reduced the score by -10.6, the processing format subtracted -6.7, and the additive load contributed -2.9 points.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.6 | 9.191 | +5.64 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 17.7% | -0.092 | -1.63 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 6.8% | -0.005 | -0.03 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 13.0% | 0.163 | +2.12 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 36.9% | -0.012 | -0.45 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.6% | -0.375 | -0.23 |
| Recipe graded poor | 4.6% | -0.065 | -0.30 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 1 | -0.876 | -0.88 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 4.6% | 0.060 | +0.27 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| Additive penalty | -13.15 | 0.222 | -2.92 |
| Processing multiplier | 0.98 | 33.786 | +33.11 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.6 | 9.191 | +5.64 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.096 | +0.00 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.115 | +0.00 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 17.7% | -0.092 | -1.63 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 6.8% | -0.005 | -0.03 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 13.0% | 0.163 | +2.12 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 36.9% | -0.012 | -0.45 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.6% | -0.375 | -0.23 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.027 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 4.6% | -0.065 | -0.30 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 1 | -0.876 | -0.88 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 4.6% | 0.060 | +0.27 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | no | 0.707 | +0.00 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | -13.15 | 0.222 | -2.92 |
| Processing multiplier | 0.98 | 33.786 | +33.11 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- +0.02
- Additives declared on label
- +2 transparency bonus
- Subtotal
- 49.5
- Final score
- 49/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
Guaranteed-analysis FEDIAF score: crude minimums and maximums are bounds, not typical values; moisture (a maximum) uses the processing median where available; experimental US score.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 65 | 71.8 (band 18 to 40%) | 100 |
| Fat | 20 | 22.1 (band 5.5 to 20%) | 100 |
| Fibre | 3 | 3.3 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 100 |
Scored over 3 declared nutrients (combined weight 50); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score. Moisture was not declared and was estimated at 9.5% from the food type.
Declared fortification: 14 nutritional additives on the label
- Vitamin E Supplement
- Niacin Supplement
- Calcium Pantothenate
- Vitamin A Supplement
- Thiamine Mononitrate
- Pyridoxine Hydrochloride
- Riboflavin Supplement
- Vitamin D3 Supplement
- Biotin
- Vitamin B12 Supplement
- Folic Acid
- Ascorbic Acid (source of Vitamin C)
- Choline Chloride
- Taurine
Low confidence: partial analysis or moisture estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (voluntary) - not on file | 0/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) - not on file | 0/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared, Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
Claims on file; none we can check against the label
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Access the Ultimate Carnivorous Kibble™ that is the foundation of our powerful ℞estore™ diets (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Restore™ is a complete diet for both dogs and cats (on pack) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Feed it as a singular meal, nutritious treat, or as an addition and enhancement to any other meals (on pack) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| formulated to meet the nutritional levels established by the AAFCO Dog and Cat Food Nutrient Profiles for Maintenance (on pack) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| without the typical starch (carbohydrate) additions, or any junk ingredients whatsoever (on page) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Starch Free™ manufacturing techniques (on page) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| uniquely high-quality ingredients were selected to provide natural, meat-based protein and fat, and a powerful profile of essential amino acids for maximum nutritional impact (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Alternatives to Restore™
Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.